no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
15 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 35 points 1 year ago (5 children)

"As fast as possible" was 50 years ago

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You always have to settle for second best every time there's a new milestone, but second best never comes, nor the rest, until the best you can do is just try to die in peace. We did it! 🥳

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Maybe in your part of the world. Gaza, Ukraine, Russia, the USA, etc. would like a word...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I said try, and really, it's more about institutions that know better but choose not to. Ya know, the second best time to start is now, but now keeps getting pushed further

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    People who could positively impact this: "Awe, man, I go there on my yacht once a year. Anyway, those stocks still climbing? That boat needs some upgrades."

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    This is why I chose not to have kids. We're fucked. Our children will be proper fucked. Their children will probably not get to see old age. Thanks for all the fish!

  • source
  • We're fucked and now it's a matter of determining how much fuckeder we're going to be.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    Here in South Australia we are starting to see the effects and it's pretty chilling.

    The algae bloom affecting many of our suburban beaches (which is most of Adelaide) and a lot of country ones are seeing huge numbers of dead marine life being washed up.

    Anything from leafy sea dragons to fish, stingrays, and sharks. The foam created on some days covers whole sections of beach.

    While apparently it's safe, there are warnings that you may experience breathing issues and rashes so your supposed to bring your inhaler and rinse off after you have been in. On windy days it can affect you even if your walking close to the beach.

    As we head into summer the damage to local seaford providers (the seafood is fine to consume but people are wary) and cafe owners will be huge and is already starting to take effect.

    Because our beaches are so close, people would go down after work for a dip or have a drink at the suburban pubs and cafes.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-23/sa-toxic-algal-bloom-explained/105560008

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Unless global heating is reduced to 1.2C

    If we plateaued right now and did everything possible to draw CO2 out of the atmosphere and oceans, it would probably take a few thousand years to get back down. The reasoning - we weren't the main CO2 contributor, we just were the extra catalyst to throw things off to begin the acceleration up. So now that things are off balance and feedbacks are kicking in, how can we reverse what we put into the environment AND counter the extra feedback outputs? It's like trying to stop the boulder that was easy to push onto the hill slope.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Humanity absolutely was and continues to be the main 'CO2 contributor'; coal, oil, and natural gas didn't just dig themselves out of the ground and spew themselves into the atmosphere. The immediate halting of worldwide pollution is necessary, but unfortunately unlikely to occur in a manner keeping to the Paris Agreement's goals, particularly while Big Oil has such a strong influence over American politics and countries worldwide continue to rely on and expand fossil fuel production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    My phrasing may have sounded like the "humans aren't the problem" climate deniers, but my point was that our amounts are only a percentage of the natural ebb and flow of CO2. The problem is that our addition was enough to tip the scales and cause an initial slow climb that has gotten faster and faster, and our percentage (which has itself magnified in the past few decades) is still a part of an increase from other natural sources that would have stayed dormant had we not started the process. Human activity was the catalyst of the reaction, and usually a catalyst amount required isn't large.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I think we're going to have to genetically engineer some corals.

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/collapse@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Why do the rich not care about this, don’t they want a habitable world at least for their children and grandchildren if not everyone else?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's why they're building doomsday ranches and climate redoubts in places more sheltered from climate change.

    They want their children and grandchildren to be kings and feudal lords, and they've decided the way to get that is to let global society collapse and send out private armies to rule the ashes.

    I mean, the American billionaire junta has made destroying the Center for Disease Control one of its top priorities. They've joined the war against contagious disease on the side of the diseases. What does that say about their priorities?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    They have some vague idea that the structures that make money matter will continue into what's coming.

    They may be right, but I would anticipate that they will enter the new age as Montezuma falling from his litter, as wealthy Jewish families in the 1930s desperately trading scraps of gold jewelry for a slightly increased chance to stay alive. My guess is that the coming upheaval is going to be so massive, and their doomsday bunkers so reliant on a million systems of food, information-exchange, weather prediction, safety, all sorts of stuff that's so baked into the structure that they're not thinking about it right now, that all they are building for themselves is expensive tombs. I don't think the monster cares how big your ranch is. Lots of people live on ranches, and the ones with deep knowledge of the biological systems that surround them, and on friendly terms with their neighbors and already knit into resilient communities, have a much better chance at it.

    Think about Biosphere 2. Think about that libertarian cruise ship that was supposed to free them from the nation-state. These guys think their money privilege is going to continue into the post-money society, just because it always has, but there's no reason at all to think that it would.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Have you ever seen billionaire who cared about their children? Just look at Musk and Bezos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Exactly. Those heirs are placeholders, they give the oligarchs some degree of comfort that all the wealth they're hoarding won't go back to the filthy plebs. The money will still be 'theirs' even after their death, to fund their dynasties for generations to come. They'll be lionized on a painting above the fireplace in the palace that their riches built centuries prior. Or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    My parents are not rich in the typical sense of the word. They do very well, and they have a degree of comfort and financial stability that the vast majority of people can't even imagine*. There are significant indications that they don't really understand how the majority of people struggle.

    They are very clearly in the "I got mine, fuck you" mindset.

    I asked them about the climate crisis and their response was, "we'll be dead before it happens"

    I asked about their children (including me) and their grandchildren and great-grandchildren and all the pain and suffering they'll go through. The response was to ask me if I believe in God.

    They said if they believe in God, they'll get to go to heaven when they die.

    That's it.

    They've abdicated any responsibility for anything and they are leaving it up to God to deal with.

    * Full disclosure: I do pretty well myself considering. I'm in debt, and every week I panic about paying my bills, but I have a home, a job, very good health insurance, and no food anxiety. There are probably an enormous number of people who can't imagine having it as well as I have it. However, I strangely managed to get empathy. I don't want people to suffer. I think the problem is I actually paid attention to what was being taught in the church I was forced to attend. I don't believe in God, but I believe in a lot of the philosophy of Jesus. Compassion, mercy, empathy, etc. It turns out that wasn't the lesson I was supposed to get from Church.

  • source
  • parent
  • 4 comments in c/globalnews@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    🎶I feel helpless🎶

    (not an actual song that I know of)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    CSNY, written by Neil Young.

    [Verse 1] There is a town in North Ontario With dream, comfort, memory to spare And in my mind, I still need a place to go All my changes were there

    [Verse 2] Blue, blue windows behind the stars Yellow moon on the rise Big birds flying across the sky Throwing shadows on our eyes Leave us [Chorus] Helpless, helpless, helpless (Helpless, helpless, helpless, helpless) Babe, can you hear me now? (Helpless, helpless, helpless, helpless) The chains are locked and tied across the door (Helpless, helpless, helpless, helpless) Babe, sing with me somehow (Helpless, helpless, helpless, helpless)

    [Instrumental Break]

    [Verse 2] Blue, blue windows behind the stars Yellow moon on the rise Big birds flying across the sky Throwing shadows on our eyes Leave us

    [Chorus] Helpless, helpless, helpless (Helpless, helpless) Helpless, helpless, helpless (Helpless, helpless, helpless) Helpless, helpless, helpless (Helpless, helpless, helpless) Helpless, helpless, helpless (Helpless, helpless, helpless, helpless) Helpless, helpless, helpless (Helpless, helpless, helpless, helpless) Helpless, helpless (Helpless, helpless, helpless, helpless)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I'll be seeing you 🎶

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I hope against all hope that the collapse of our environment happens in a way that makes climate change deniers suffer the most, aside from oil execs of course

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/climate_lm@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago

    Global heating is now at about 1.4C.

    That depends on how far back you extend your running average. If you look at just the last few years, the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target has come and gone.

    The report does offer some hope, saying there are likely “positive tipping points” in society – such as with electric vehicle adoption – that could also have runaway effects to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

    Electric vehicles won't do much unless the underlying electricity generation switches to clean energy sources. That does seem to be the trend, but claiming that electric vehicles alone will offer a solution is misleading. If anything, the reduced aerosol emissions resulting from electric vehicle adoption and non-combustion sources of electricity could make the problem worse in the short term. Stopping fossil fuel use too quickly would actually be suicidal, and so GHG emissions reductions must come from other sectors. One industry in particular seems like a reasonable target...

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/climate@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It's a bit misleading. The GAT is something like a 20 year average. 1.5°C is here in 2024. Only the averaging from 2004 to 2024 keeps it lower.

    Dem tipping points being tipped already. Couching it in the language of scientific caution is a mugs game. Shit's fucked 'yo. You're fucked. Already fucked. The biosphere doesn't want you anymore. Enjoy the ride to oblivion.

  • source