all 68 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 92 points 1 year ago (18 children)

"Gangnam Style" (Korean: 강남스타일; pronounced [kaŋ.nam sɯ.tʰa.il]) is a K-pop song by South Korean singer Psy, released on July 15, 2012,

Gangham style is over a decade old

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Gangham style is over a decade old

    You did not have to do me dirty like that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Lol I was in middle school, I remember everyone trying to do the dance, we were all confused about why it was popular but also super into it, 9gag, vine, ifunny, joined reddit then, simpler times, hopeful future

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 130 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Death of the author is a thing.

    Whatever meaning you derive from a piece of art personally is just as valid as the intended meaning

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 228 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Don’t worry. The sculptor made sure you can’t misinterpret their work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No no no.

    In school in higher education we had to interpret poems.

    I am definitely sure, that neither the author's opinion or my opinion are relevant. It is only the teacher's opinion that is relevant.

    (Do I need the /s?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Be me, a literal reading scifi fan in 11th grade English having to read Jane Eyre and find all the damn symbolism. When all I saw was a 19th century romance novel. Blech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Fortunately in English classes (I learned English at school) we read Macbeth. There's a lot of layers to Shakespeare - for example a lot of allusions which you'll only understand when you know about the time it was written in. And our English teacher dragged in a native speaker to help out with conversation, who was a student living in my town.

    In German (my native language) however, we were presented a poem without not enough context about the author and had to answer "what's the meaning of this". Most of the German teachers I had were boring, lazy or both.

    Your literature problem - I had that in German, Thomas Mann's "Der Tod in Venedig". Yeah, I as a teenager was so eager to read about the homoerotic thoughts of an older man traveling to Venice and lusting about a young boy. Yes, of course it's symbolic but - fuuuuck me, really? Do I need to read that.

    Mark Twain has written an essay about the "awful German Language" (I don't agree). Amongst other things he complained about long sentences.

    Ha! He know NOTHING! He had not seen the works of Thomas Mann. Thomas Mann must have been hugely intelligent. He managed to write a single sentence that is too long for a single fucking book page. With a random number of subclauses in between. Exploiting all the cleartext encryption mechanisms the German language allows! With the most boring content a teenager in the height of puberty can not relate to.

    I still have a visceral hate for Thomas Mann. In my 40s I thought I'd give that book another chance. Nope. Still hate it.

    Ah, soon I'm 40 years past school and I still get PTSD about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Funny that you mention this. I replied to another comment about how Gangnam Style is satire about the hyper-wealthy. However, the meaning derived by all of the audiences outside of South Korea was 'haha dancing man likes horses and yoga women'.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There's also little speaker next to it that plays Gangnam Style on repeat 24/7

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    🎵hey, sexy lady🎵

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

    There was a particular statue of two pairs of arms hugging representing MLK Jr and his wife Corretta that inspired the exact opposite feelings, apparently, as many onlookers mistakenly thought it was something more obscene.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It's actually all four. I can see how one might confuse it for something obscene without the context.

    If you ask me, I think we need to make obscene statues hip again. Bring back the priapus statues!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What is all four, tf are you talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    It is all four arms, both of MLK Jr's and both of Corretta Scott King's.

    one side.

    the other side.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I saw this is Boston just last week, my first view of it was the second picture. I mentioned to my partner that it looked like a sex act. I’m so glad I’m not the only one who sees that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Uh...

    No. Completely different statue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

    This statue of King was also thought to be an improper depiction.

    “We don't even see his feet. He is embedded in the rock like something not yet fully born, suited and stern, rising from its roughly chiseled surface. His face is uncompromising, determined, his eyes fixed in the distance, not far from where Jefferson stands across the water. But kitsch here strains at the limits of resemblance: Is this the Dr. King of the "I Have a Dream" speech? Or the writer of the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech?”

    -Edward Rothstein

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Heeey, sexy ladies

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Someone told me that Oppa means 'Uncle', but in the particular district of Gangnam the word Oppa/Uncle also means Pimp.

    So it's basically a song based on a pretty bad pun. I'll protect you like an uncle, and by Uncle I mean Pimp.

    EDIT: English speakers likely would do better with the translation as 'Ill be like a Father to you, a real Las Vegas Pimp Daddy (where Daddy is a word that means Father but has more Pimp connotations, and Las Vegas being famous for legalized prostitution).

    It's definitely debauchery. But we likely have memorials to Austin Powers and other such pop culture icons, so it's understandable.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I don’t speak Korean but most sources I could find say Oppa means ‘older brother’ but also women call their boyfriend oppa. Also Gangnam is one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in Seoul. Oppa Gangnam Style would mean Gangnam boyfriend or rich boyfriend or sugar daddy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    You're pretty much there. Oppa is literally 'older brother' but is generally used towards a man who is older but within the same age-hierarchy bracket. It is a term exclusively used by women, except for when men are referring to themselves in the 3rd person from the perspective of women. As mentioned, women often call their boyfriend/husband oppa in casual environments.

    The lyrics of the chorus is "오빤 강남 스타일" ("Oppan Gangnam Style") where the 'n' after 'oppa' is like a contraction of "오빠는" ('Oppa nun' / "Oppa is"). Gangnam is a neighborhood in Seoul where literal 1%ers live. So he's basically letting the women know he's a wealthy/noteworthy/powerful guy, since he is 'Gangnam Style'.

    In truth, the way he describes himself and the women he chases are caricatures of South Korean wealth, materialism, and high-class identity. The video starts with him pretending to be at a beach, when the camera pans out it's actually a sandlot for a playground. More examples of his phony elegance show up across the video, such as dancing on a tour bus and singing in a toilet stall. The lyrics of the song flaunt the lavish lives of the hyper-wealthy, while the imagery points out how trashy and narcissistic that kind of lifestyle can be.

    Sorry for the rant, I just remember a lot of stuff I learned about it while writing a report in high school. I hope someone learned something :P

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Thanks for the clarification.

    It could be 10+ years of me misremembering the explanation. The person who told me this was Korean, so it seems more likely that I misremembered than them explaining it wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    My first thought was: "Oh nice, they've made a statue on how to not measure your own pulse."

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I remember the dude showing me Gangnam style. I remember Gangnam style hitting the billion views as the first video ever. And it did that in 6 months. Good times.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -40 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    It was a fucking banger and a true classic of this millennium's tween years you tasteless, joyless, spork sharpener.

    addendum: the lil "discourse" below this comment is 🍫🍿🥤

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I dont believe one could be a millenial tween in 2012

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    Millennium as in 2000-3000 not millennial as the generation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)