Given how often headlines claim that Maga has imploded, melted down, or been slammed, one would think that nothing would be left of it by now—but unfortunately, none of this has any consequences.
post
That last bit of "This is nothing like what it's like at night. It's really bad!"
Oh my god princess. They're blasting music and dancing in inflated costumes. For fuck sake, talk about snowflakes.
Is this whole administration going to turn out to just be a Family Guy skit culminating in Peter fighting that giant chicken again? 🤔
Rooting the fuck out of that chicken to win decisively.
As an Australian this sentence made me do a double take.
You'll do WHAT to the chicken?
Im more suprised that you didnt double take about the US trying to fight a giant bird (and losing).
<3 love our friends from the land down under, that history bit is just so funny.
Naaah, we fight giant birds all the time, so that's just normal for us down here.
🤣 I very much appreciate you Aussies!
Had the pleasure to visit Sydney, Cairns (specifically Trinity Beach), and swim in the Great Barrier Reef last year. I love your country, how clean it is, and how awesome all the locals were.
MAGA “implodes” over just about anything.
But do they actually?
Honestly, it seems like the only 'source' for any of these "MAGA in shambles!" stories are just a few angry posts on Twitter or whatever. By and large, the MAGAts (besides a few notable exceptions like MTG) appear to be as happy and as united as ever.
They’re beautiful fantasies painted with colorful language, but lack any substance. Great for clicks, not quite as good for measuring the state of reality. That’s what the internet is now, just click farming
Did you forget about cracker barrel already?
With how often they do it you think more billionaires would die but nooooo... all we get is stupid ass Nazi pissing matches. Fuck you Stockton Rush couldn't you have convinced some more dipsticks to go out with you.
I think what is happening is the reluctance of associating the term influencer with propagandist. The terms themselves are synonymous, influencer a little more specific, and without the added negative connotations propagandist has. If people realized “influencer” is just another term for propagandist, that may harm ad revenue. So we have “distinctions” being made, between influencers who do regular propaganda and influencers who do bad propaganda or “influencer propaganda” instead of just admitting they are all by definition propagandists.
Propaganda is the expression of opinions or actions carried out deliberately by individuals or groups with a view to influencing the opinions or actions of other individuals or groups for predetermined ends and through psychological manipulations.
Propaganda, Jacques Ellul
If the "maga" didn't have their brains completely pickled by being steeped in racism, propaganda from hate radio and Faux, they should double over in laughter like all normal humans did.
Side note: I wonder if her animal-killing instincts (because according to her, if you live the rural life, you are a psychopath just like her. That's just "rural life" or something, lol.) weren't telling her to race down there and choke that chicken...
Oh yeah, look at Secretary Noem bravely staring down the violent mob, in a chicken suit playing the Benny Hill theme song, an antifa anthem representing chaos and disorder.
You know, I kinda see now the point on why super heroes wear costumes. With their identities protected, they feel more powerful. I would feel invulnerable staring down on Noem while wearing a chicken suit.
She's so exposed. I'm just waiting for her to get domed in playing sight with the police.
It's "in plain sight", as in, very easily visible.
And no, I'm not calling you an AI. A clanker would have known the difference.
For all intensive purposes, it doesn't matter. Case and point, I understood fine.
No need to call out a clanker as an escape goat.
Ultimately it's all a moo point.
In "playing" sight isn't a misheard phrase I've encountered before, but that's a little surprising given how much sense it makes.
Autistic much? It's a typo. Bravo. Clearly nobody knew what was up. But thank you for the lesson.
Maybe you're the clanker, lacking in ability to read the context and understand somebody might have made a typo.
...the AI thing is referring to your username.
And what's wrong with being autistic?
I'd love to read the article without a pay wall.
Yes, I could take the time to look for the archive, but if OP couldn't be bothered, neither can I.
I highly doubt anything is "imploding". More likely MAGA is just ignoring the stupid aspect of the stunts.
I stopped reading at the part where they say provocateur is the wrong word and how using the wrong word diminishes the overall piece.
After all, these people are not propagandists. They don't spread hate as a means to an end. Hate and xenophobia is not a tool in their arsenal. It's not a "take it or leave it" proposition.
It's crazy to paint maga as a bunch of calculated leaders who only care about procedural theories and abstract policy, and it's just their followers who believe the hype.
And because the author used the wrong word I guess that means this article is overall worse for it.
Edit: and the aggressive headline! I guess if their editor used the wrong words then the article must be worse than I thought.
all 48 comments