A good New York Times piece on Portland nevertheless demonstrates how the conventions of objective reporting fail to accurately capture the bad faith driving pro-Trump propaganda.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

It's "in plain sight", as in, very easily visible.

And no, I'm not calling you an AI. A clanker would have known the difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    For all intensive purposes, it doesn't matter. Case and point, I understood fine.

    No need to call out a clanker as an escape goat.

    Ultimately it's all a moo point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Autistic much? It's a typo. Bravo. Clearly nobody knew what was up. But thank you for the lesson.

    Maybe you're the clanker, lacking in ability to read the context and understand somebody might have made a typo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments