Not a glitch, this is how they introduce these ideas and shift the Overton window more right.
post
CNN edited their YouTube clip of the interview and removed the part in question. Someone on Reddit clipped it though: https://www.reddit.com/r/Military/comments/1o0x5ib/miller_glitches_while_falsely_claiming_title_10/
CNN is state media. It cannot be trusted.
For real, this is literally the moment that all trust in the media collapsed.
Apparently Reddit is working hard to try to scrub that off their site as well. The boot licking continues.
So I looked it up and title 10 is all the rules that govern the US armed forces. The president of the United States can trivially be shown to not have plenary authority by the simple fact that the constitution exists. That is in fact the entire point of the constitution, it ensures nobody in the United States has plenary authority. Even title 10 disproves that as it sets out the rules that US armed forces must operate under.
Didn't you get the news last week? Clarence Thomas issued a new ruling that declared the constitution unconstitutional. Apparently they didn't have the right to write it so he nullified it.
The constitution is a social contract. Since such a contract can serve as the basis for all society, then the legitimacy of all contractual obligations are linked to the legitimacy of this one, that ensure we have rights and freedom in order to enter into contractual obligations.
Since the representatives of the state founded on the constitution have broken the social contract, then all contracts are null and void.
You say so knowingly, without elaborating, like a true sage /jk
Isn't law just a social contract then‽
Law is a human invented word in the English language. It can describe many things. One is natural law or the laws of physics. These laws have nothing to do with a social contract.
We can formulate socially governing laws derived from natural laws confirmed by mathematics. Those laws would be more reliable.
Ultimately, any laws governing human society are reliant on people subscribing to said laws. If a cohort decides not to follow those laws, then they cannot expect to benefit from them.
That sort of relationship has yet to be properly formalized and has a significant lag time.
Suspicion? This has been the goal of right wing and conservative think tanks for decades now. The end goal of conservatism is monarchy. "Plenary Authority" is just a fancy way of saying "The King can do anything he wants".
It took that for someone to become "suspicious" of the Trump Administration while Trump has been talking about dictatorship for years now ... what a joke.
ITT : Lots of very suspect defense of nazis.
Right?! Fuck these Nazis, and fuck you if you have any sympathy for them, you're fucking evil too
Yes yes, and Hitler was probably very nice to his pet dog, but still fuck that guy and we're all glad he's dead.
Yeah, they're humans making nazi decisions, fuck em
Yeah, I'm disturbed alright
I hope someone is planning to spin up a new House Un-American Activities Committee to deal with these shit stains when this is all over.
The executive is a co-equal branch of government. We don't do kings here. We kill kings.
We also kill Nazis. Per long tradition. We don't debate them. We don't platform them. Nazis are guilt free kills. Don't even count as human.
We have never killed kings here. We also stayed out of Nazi affairs for many years. The sentiment is nice, but more than misleading. You got weird history books anon
Maybe he meant Martin Luther King?
Goddamn, that hits hard.
Not only that, but we also support most dictatorships around the world, we fund genocide, overthrow democratically elected governments, and assassinate people like Lincoln, JFK, & MLK.
Don't even count as human.
... People can be evil (and even deserve execution) without dehumanizing them. You know, the exact thing we hate them for doing?
People calling you a nazi sympathizer don't know that most people who actively participated as members of the German nazi party were 'normal' people. They lived normal lives, followed the law, and existed in normal society. In reality, most people supporting our current nazi problems will need to be deprogrammed and forcibly pulled back into an accepting society. Its what happened in Germany, not many nazis were charged with crimes.
Similar shit happened in Indonesia after the genocide. People had to go back to being neighbours with somewhat typical people who were former state sanctioned serial killers and enablers. Germany tried to deprogram the youth in the '50s, but yeah. Didn’t stick, for various reasons. Harsh reality.
Still, no society has recovered from fascist or similar regimes without at least some targeted pruning of the tree of life. Putin SHOULD obsess about what happened to Gaddafi and the like. Society has to remember or, well, here we are again.
Are you agreeing with them? If not, It's really just the two weirdos ITT who cannot fathom the idea that bad people are still people.
Nah, Nazis are inhuman garbage
Nazis are human garbage.
As humans, they have human rights... But they also should be punished for their violations of human rights. The law, as it currently stands, is not fulfilling its purpose of punishing bad actions. Thus, it is up to us to punish them.
Punch a Nazi today!
You're defending nazis right now. Reflect on that. Be better.
A lazy and false statement that even the slightest of thought rips into a million little pieces. You're advocating for conditional dehumanization. Something that actually should provoke reflection.
From my interactions with leftists, they think that the Nazis' only crime was wearing the wrong uniform. The oppression, tyranny and murder? Totally okay. They were just wearing the wrong symbols while they did it.

RED ALERT
YOU HAVE JUST MADE A PROFOUNDLY STUPID COMMENT AND SHOULD BE RIDICULED THEN IGNORED
The comment at the top of this thread that encouraged the exact same kind of dehumanization and murder that the Nazis based their movement on? Can you not read?
I have no clue what you're talking about but I'm sick of people grouping others together and then raging about groupthink that doesn't even necessarily exist.
I group together those espousing a particular sentiment and that makes sense to me. They told me what they believe.
It's another totally pointless shitty waste of time to say "-ists are all [horrible thing]!!"
Fuck that shit.
I know a lot of other social medias censor this idea, but throughout history, a lot of human rights only came about when people rose up to defend it.
We don't do kings here. We kill kings.

Literally never killed a king in their history. The closest they got was killing aboriginal chieftains. Muricans just got salty because the King of England refused to let them colonize the native tribes in the great lakes region (which the crown had declared a self-governing protectorate). Americans declared a revolution and cloaked it in jingoistic hoopla about liberty. They also tried (and failed) to enlist Quebec to join them.
Hey to be fair the US government has killed 1 king in their history, it was just MLK..
Love it. Sincerely I do.
American: kill kings!
European: amateurs.
Lol.
Not the only time. Another example is the West Africa Squadron, where a small part of the British Navy tried to block all slave traffic coming out of West Africa.
The UK has done some insanely horrific things, but it does have some legitimate bright spots in there.
Broken clock, etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Proclamation_of_1763
[Historians] have argued that colonial resentment of the proclamation contributed to the growing divide between the colonies and the mother country. Some historians say that even though the boundary was pushed west in subsequent treaties, the British government refused to permit new colonial settlements for fear of instigating a war with Native Americans, which angered colonial land speculators.
The US has put or helped keep more kings in power than they have taken out of power. Also, I would like to point out that King George III did not die in the American revolutionary war.
"our country is too big and no one is leading us"
That's it. That's the reason. According to Americans on Lemmy/PieFed/Mastodon/Reddit is the drive to DC is too long. Regardless of where you live. Live in New York? it's a long drive. California? it's a very long drive. Maryland? way too long. Also unlike other countries Americans need a schedule and a specific time and date to do it. Other countries will just hit the streets with no planning, no times or dates, they just know something bad is happening and will leave their homes and protest. Americans don't do that. they NEED someone else to organize for them to tell them something bad is happening and to let everyone know about it on this specific date,at this specific time and to please register online to confirm your attendance.
The actual answer? deep down, the vast majority of americans simply don't care.
We are pushing back, it's just the US is far more spread out then European countries and protests are purposely not being covered in mainstream media. Not to say we couldn't be better or doing more.
Rest of the world: Why haven't you started the bloodiest civil war killing the most Americans of any conflict ever since the last one?
Americans: 
The intolerance will be met with equal intolerance.
Indeed, America accepted thousands of Nazis with open arms, from Germany after the second world war. That worked out well.
Tbf they made some damn good rockets once you got them to shut up about the whole antisemitism thing.
The US probably wouldnt have made it to the moon without having them. History is far more complex and nuanced than we often make it out to be
But.. but.. ”zey vere just folloving orders”
Punch-a-nazi would be a great substitute for whack-a-mole BTW
The French killed kings and nazis. The British killed kings and nazis. The Polish killed kings and nazis. The Russian killed kings and nazis. And replaced their king with fucking Stalin. The Canadians rebelled and won against a king(winning the right to create their own government) and killed nazis. (You get the idea)
The US was tricked by their upper class into rebelling, and then replaced the king with a pseudo-king. The US started WW2 helping the Nazis
Nazis are certainly human. Not disagreing with the rest of your statements but denying reality doesn't help anything.
Chat, is this AI?
And by that I mean Miller himself. Is he a robit.
What’s a robit?
Its just a way some people say robot.
Often older folks or with regional accents.
top 99 comments