Nice project. Seems a bit heavy on the dependency side.
Psst: step 2 of the install instructions has a question to you from the LLM writing the docs. lol
Nice project. Seems a bit heavy on the dependency side.
Psst: step 2 of the install instructions has a question to you from the LLM writing the docs. lol
You can't write your own docs? Well, I guess nobody would use your shitty project anyway. Probably generated by an agent as well.
The name of this project is at least accurrate, but I have my suspicions that it is also generated by AI. OP, are you the "dev" of this?
That was mean as heck though. One can be correct and approachable at the same time.
Well aren't you a bright little ray of light. At this moment your question is akin to saying "You can't write all the scaffolding instead of running cargo new --bin oh_wow_im_so_leet_i_disparage_my_brothers_and_sisters_sharing_open_source_software_for_free"
Go skim through my Github if you want to call me a "developer", pick a project and contribute.
Who in their right mind would sit around writing insane regex for weeks, of course this particular project was augmented with a conversation with an LLM.
Nice undocumented fork of project though. Proud of u.
hey, exgf, have you heard of a "ragebait"?

My sibling in craft, docs are not "boilerplate", they are the main freaking sauce. That is why they should be written by a human who understands stuff. I genuinely believe you are missing the point of the practice.
IMHO generated docs (and yes, LLM spitting out stuff is generated docs) should not be committed to the repo. Something like this should happen on the cargo doc/docs.rs side (with opt-in from the user, of course). This has a couple major benefits, the main one being that the docs can improve as the LLM improves.
Who's "Agent Spaghetti,' and what do they want?
no comments (yet)