Nearly a third of Americans – 30% – say people may have to resort to violence in order to get the country back on track, according to the latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll.

It’s a sharp rise from 18 months ago, when 19% of Americans said the same.

top 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 136 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (33 children)

We need a general strike. The country would be brought to its knees if deprived of profit and labor. That tactic was extremely effective in Chile in 2019, and had they not fallen for the trick of liberal reform, they would've had a successful revolution on their hands with virtually no bloodshed.

If you aren't in a union, then please consider joining the IWW to unionize your workplace (bonus: you'll get higher wages, better benefits, and more time off if you succeed!) to strengthen a general strike if we finally manage to enact one (the UAW is planning one for May 1st 2028, but it could happen sooner)

And for our international friends, you should join one as well, as fascism is gaining momentum globally. If your country isn't listed below, just contact the IWW directly in the link above.

  • 🇦🇷 Argentina: FORA
  • 🇦🇺 Australia: ASF-IWA
  • 🇧🇷 Brazil: FOB
  • 🇧🇬 Bulgaria: ARS, CITUB
  • 🇩🇪 Germany: FAU
  • 🇬🇷 Greece: ESE
  • 🇮🇹 Italy: USI
  • 🇳🇱 🇧🇪 Netherlands & Belgium: Vriji Bond
  • 🇪🇸 Spain: CNT
  • 🇸🇪 Sweden: SAC
  • 🇬🇧 United Kingdom: UVW
  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I agree that a general strike is the absolute least that should be done. But a general strike would have to hit the ground with the EXPECTATION that it will get violent.

    It's inevitable that Cheeto will try to use his jackbooted thugs to crack down hard, and taking it meekly and then hoping to sue over it later won't be an option.

    When the MAGA S.A. come to put you down, they aren't going to stop. I'm not saying that the strikers should start violence. But go in eyes open with the understanding that a a certain point, you all are going to have to make the fuckers bleed because they won't think twice about doing it to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    At this point I'm tired of people trying to give a prescription for the 'right way to do things'

    “A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” Hunter S. Thompson

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    The problem is there absolutely is many, many wrong paths to take, and we have to learn from past attempts to avoid their mistakes. Notice how the arab spring movement, while initially promising, ultimately failed to prevent a new authoritarian regime from taking hold in most of those countries.

    There are going to be different prescriptions from all political ideologies, but most of them can be dismissed to narrow down the possibilities.

    • Right-Libertarians will advise we privatize everything and remove regulations - Doesn't work. Creates the conditions for Neo-fuedalism and capital dominating every aspect of life.
    • Moderates/Social Democrats will suggest we can reform our way out of this by voting for the right people - Didn't work in Nazi Germany, didn't work in Franco's Spain. Due to corporate capture, they ultimately cannot resolve the issues that cause people to foolishly shift toward fascism in hopes to escape those issues.
    • Marxist-Leninists will say we just need a revolution with a Vanguard party - Doesn't work. Results in extremely unfree authoritarian states like the USSR, North Korea, and China's CCP. Basically state capitalism under the guise of socialism in name only.

    That leaves the Libertarian-left/Anarchists. We have evidence that their methods result in pretty sweet outcomes, they just have never survived very long due to the whole world usually being against them.

    Okay, so what do we do to in our case? First off, avoiding a civil war or extreme violence is vastly preferable, as the alternative has some big downsides. The best non-violent method we have at our disposal is a General Strike, which directly targets the machinery that fascist states rely on. Combined with mutual aid networks and civil disobedience, it has a rather good chance of preventing a fascist takeover with a minimum of violence.

    The alternative is straight up revolution, which requires the participating population to be educated on a shared vision, methods to organize, and how to avoid centralizing power structures or cult of personalities which lend themselves to co-option by the above mentioned groups.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I 100% agree with the overall point that there are very bad outcomes to getting this wrong, but my point is that we are out of time. Even if we manage to pull off a general strike with mural aid and civil disobedience we could eventually all have to come together on a direction or course of action going forward and I dont see that happening and even in the best of circumstances I think the country balkanizes/otherwise dissolves after a series of geographically and ideologically independent insurgencies rise up from the chaos that's about to happen.

    I'm not trying to be a doomer, but I think the time to steer into the skid has passed

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    Can you afford not to get paid for 2 weeks? If so you're in the minority. Most people can't. Not to mention they have kids they are worried about, medical conditions that they can barely afford even with insurance. Rising housing and grocery costs. Etc..

    I'm not trying to be a downer. I would love to see this happen, but we need a "realistic" way to accomplish it, to convince a majority to participate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Unions build up strike-funds with membership dues so that members can continue to receive a salary while striking, that's why unions are so essential for working class people to be able to flex their power non-violently.

    Consider that Chile is a much less wealthy country than the US. but was able to successfully commit to a general strike for over a month.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Honest question, how much of the US population do you think is unionized? Without looking it up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I'm familiar with the depressing statistic already, a little under 10%.

    However, bear in mind that the majority of the most critical infrastructure for making profit, such as ports, trains, trucking, and medical care have the highest rates of unionized jobs, and would still be incredibly effective for a general strike (Generally only 3.5% of the population would need to participate to have a meaningful effect). Even with our abyssal rate of unionization, we still hold incredible leverage if we choose to use it.

    The UAW has a general strike planned for May 1st 2028, which has real odds of working. Unfortunately it's still 2 years out, and by that time may be too late. I'm hoping it's moved up at some point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Realistic way is people just drop out of consumer economy to the fullest degree possible for them. Cancel all unnecessary subscriptions, shop local for only necessities. Look how quickly Disney blinked just because of a wave of cancellations, now do that everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    People are going to cite the Kimmel cancellations until we legally aren't allowed to. I... am skeptical.

    A common talking point was that the real danger isn't people who cancel out of solidarity: it is people who realize they have a disney plus subscription they haven't used since Mandalorian Season 2. Because those are the bread and butter for these services and once people look at their bill and realize how much they have been spending over the years, they tend to not come back. And this all lined up with Disney (allegedly?) wanting to do a cost increase and enough "mainstream media" pointing out that Kimmel didn't actually say anything even slightly controversial.

    Contrast that with stuff like Sucker Punch firing the dev who made a Mario and Luigi joke and tripling down on it... and nobody giving a shit because Ghost of Yotei is coming out! Or all the attempts at encouraging people to support BDS boycotts. I mean, Palestine was the single biggest issue and the sole reason the Democrats lost, right? Then... why is everyone leaping at new gamepass deals and so forth?

    Time and time again it is shown that people just don't boycott luxury goods. If you can afford a luxury good you "earned it" and will find every possible excuse to keep buying it. What DOES tend to work is contacting the advertisers. Much like chuds contacted credit card companies to get gay games off Steam et al. Because, much like contacting your elected official, they understand that people actually caring enough to pick up the phone means a lot of people are REALLY angry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Palestine was not the sole reason Democrats lost or the single biggest issue for voters according to the polling data. There was a small percentage for whom it was their sole or primary motivation in voting.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wrong way of thinking, buddy boy.

    If you can't afford to go without pay for 2 weeks now, then where do you think you'll be in 2 years time?

    Act now while you're breathing, for the sake of being able to breathe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Can you afford not to get paid for 2 weeks? If so you’re in the minority. Most people can’t.

    The general strike is being planned for almost 3 years out. We would have to save less than 2% of our paycheck to more than cover 2 weeks without being paid. We need to normalize preparing for a general strike, and be willing to help each other if needed when the time comes

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Can they afford to live under a fascist dictatorship that crushes dissenters and disappears citizens at will? It seems that by "realistic" resistance you mean "without inconvenience" but we're never going to get to that point. That seems to be what people are hoping for and it just doesn't work that way. The longer we wait the more sacrifice will be required.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No I mean "realistic" as in getting enough people to participate that it would actually have an impact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Will those people attempt to make an impact if the cost is more than inconvenience?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    What? What are you talking about? If enough people don't participate then it won't make a difference. And you're asking if they would still participate if it costs too much?? I'm sure many people would love to join but feel due to their current circumstances that they can't. That demo of people is being overlooked and shit on for some stupid reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Perhaps this is why trump just declared war on nonprofits. They could potentially pull together resources to keep people fed during a coordinated nationwide strike.

    They in general exist to tackle goals directly opposed to fascist regimes, so it males sense to target them.

    Education, social justice, feeding the hungry, and protecting nature are all examples of goals Trump's regime are staunchly against.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That's why mutual aid organizations are essential. They operate outside of the legal system, so can't be directly targeted as easily. If you or anyone else reading this have the time, please consider joining your local mutual aid group. That could be Food Not Bombs, a different group local to your city or town, or even your local church if you're in a rural area.

    If you don't have one in your area, start one! Here's a little guide on how and where to find likeminded folk to start one with: https://infosec.exchange/@tinker/113589807117870451

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    To add on to this:

    Look what happens when people protest or go on strike. Everyone SAYS they are in full solidarity with the workers at Starbucks. But they also gotta get to work and that picket line is really holding up traffic... and now they also need to drive three blocks away to a different Starbucks. Look, something something no ethical consumption under capitalism so fuck you I earned this coffee milkshake and maybe if you worked harder you could buy one too.

    A General Strike requires a fairly overwhelming majority of support to begin with. And, if we had that... we wouldn't be inching ever closer to a civil war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Just because something is hard doesn't mean we shouldn't with for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It isn't about being "hard". It is about being "effective" and understanding the circumstances and impact.

    But also... yeah, "this is going to be really hard" IS a consideration when it comes to social action. Because you have very few chances at that before people get bored or get demoralized. One of the most cliche examples are all the college kids who inevitably get super behind a candidate who doesn't win and then they start insisting that voting doesn't matter.

    But the inverse of this is a very real consideration amongst the people who organize protests and resistance. There is a shocking amount of effort "behind the scenes" to downplay stupid fucking bullshit like "make your profile picture black". Because people do it and say "I helped" and start ignoring you. And while there is a LOT of discussion and argument regarding the utility of the parade protests... at least those get people outside.

    And the start of any form of action is to understand what the impact of said action is and whether it is even feasible to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Can you afford not to get paid for 2 weeks? If so you’re in the minority. Most people can’t.

    Let's be honest most people living in first world countries can indeed do that but they don't like to renounce to all the commodities they have.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 294 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    It’s a horrific moment to see that people honestly believe that there’s no other alternative at this point than to resort to political violence.

    I mean… is it? I think it’s pretty obvious in the context of the regime essentially giving itself carte blanch to perpetrate political violence on its desired scapegoats and opponents.

    I’m frankly getting pretty fucking tired of people complaining about how this is a startling development and being shocked by what’s happening. They wrote a playbook back in 2019. They published it on the open internet. They said they would follow it. They are now following it. You are not allowed to be surprised by any of this.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    This country is BUILT on political violence. The revolutionary war. The civil war. Hundreds of thousands of people died in those conflicts. Only more recently have non-violent protests accomplished anything and that was only possible because of the more free atmosphere those wars established in this country. That freedom is now almost entirely gone. What choice do people have left?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don't forget the riots and strikes between 1900 and 1920 (or 30?).

    Successful application of violence today is complicated by the sophistication of surveillance and the electronic, centralized distribution of money.

    It's difficult to pull together a large enough coalition to be able to fight effectively because the process of finding those people is short circuited by early discovery.

    Nonviolence is the only way until a large enough segment of the population is desperate enough to trigger action.

    Before that happens, effective leaders must be found and a support network must be readied to go into action quickly to professionalize and unify it when it happens, but before that is used to manage nonviolent action..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    While I agree that non-violent is the way to go, I think we need to change our definition of "violence."

    Property destruction should not be considered violent. Especially when precautions are specifically taken to ensure that no people were harmed during act of property destruction or sabotage.

    On the other side of things, actions such as destroying wildlife habitat or polluting the air, water, and soil systems of the Earth should be considered "violence." It is violence towards all of humanity, and towards life itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Incredibly recently. The Civil Rights movement included advocacy for political violence, and arguably one of the only reasons it worked was Malcolm X and the Black Panthers saying "hey here's our alternative if our nonviolent fight doesn't work, we're all strapped and willing to hand out more guns if shit requires it".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago* (30 children)

    This reflects a feeling of being backed into a corner. What else are we going to do when our political views and goals and ffs human beings are being criminalized? Every decent thing getting rolled back and every horrible thing dialed up to 11. Fuck republicans. One way or another they will regret this. Whether people vote them out or get violent with them remains to be seen but this will not last, obviously.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (29 children)

    I can't wait until the day that these filth learn that we outnumber them 10 to 1.

    It's up to them how they learn this fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

    I'm terrified of it.

    I've talked to relatives on both sides of my family who have experience those times and they have nothing good to say about it.

    My grandmother went from hoping the Nazis would ignore her, to hoping the American bombs would miss her, to hoping that the Russian soldiers wouldn't rape her.

    My grandfather had guys from both the KMT and the CPC point guns at his head to try to get him to join (on separate occasions) and ended up a refugee.

    Both China and Austria are doing very nicely now but boy did it suck getting there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    My grandmother went from hoping the Nazis would ignore her, to hoping the American bombs would miss her, to hoping that the Russian soldiers wouldn’t rape her.

    Its a shame she didn't just start fighting back instead of just hoping they'd ignore her.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah. It's a shame she didn't get together with all her teenage friends and face off against the SS. That definitely would have stopped them in their tracks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    How do you think they were beaten? By running away?

    And loads if French resistors were teenaged.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What was the single biggest success of the French resistance?

    What would those teenagers have done differently to not end up like the White Rose?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They provided a massive amount of intelligence, without with, the advance of Allied forces would have been far slower, and far more bloody. They also freed quite a number of Allied POWs, and got them back past the lines. They also downed comms and infra against the Nazis to blind them and slow their advances. They were also a key reason France was able to rapidly rebuild it's forces post WWII.

    Do people just skip WWII history these days?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    People like to romanticize the effectiveness of individual heroism but that's not what wins wars.

    France wasn't liberated until a giant army showed up and pushed the Nazis out. That was mostly possible because the US had poured unprecedented resources into the war and the Soviets traded millions of lives with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The fuck is wrong with you?

    Some people are not fighters. The species is full of variation because we are cultural and depend on specialization. I state the obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We all have choices to make. To live as a slave, or fight for freedom. Are some people just "naturally slaves"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Soldiers require 2 to 20 people each providing support. You can resist without picking up a gun. Stop assuming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Providing support isn't the same as "hiding and hoping Nazis ignore me". Spoiler: They wont ignore you for long, and you hoping they go away just allows them to centralize and build their power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Sounds delusional to me.. if we outnumber them 10 to 1 why the fuck is a republican sitting on the highest seat in the country? Everyone just sat out the vote??? Okay. Then what the fuck do you expect them to do to republicans if they can’t even vote?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Okay but without any sort of investigation or evidence this is just a tweet of a crazy rich person.. which by the way if we start taking every one of this cunts tweets as fact then I guess that cave diver that saved all those people was actually a pedophile and I also suppose you believe we will colonize mars by 2030? Or that Neuralink can cure all diseases?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    I know I'm outnumbered by conservatives in my area. And, while they might not voluntarily admit to bigotry, they do strongly believe in a hierarchy of power, and that failing to be obedient to a higher authority is justification for any punishment you (not them!) receive. They also believe that the laws should reflect "Biblical" teachings and that "The Church" (their church, not those Catholic "idol worshipers") should be involved in health care, education, and the work place not just reflected in the laws.

    They also tend to own guns and know how to use them, but that somewhat depends on their income. It's an outsized spend, but when you are on food stamps, you aren't also stockpiling ammo or acquiring more guns.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Idiots got tired of not being allowed to be racist.

    Harris was thoroughly unappealing to many, and the Democrats were masterfully outmaneuvered by the Republicans seeding shit about Gaza and rallying minorities against her.

    In swing states there was definitely vote manipulation. You had Musk offering to pay people to vote.

    I would say after the outcome of Project 2025, he's finally pissed off minorities and farmers, and business owners, now he's working on the military.

    Now he's threatening to send the US military in against cities.

    I think the only one delusional here is you. votes will tell eventually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    You left out that we had years of dems talking about DACA but harris/biden tried to triangulate on immigration leading to latinos not voting in many places.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's what I used to think too.

    Then, around Trump's first campaign, I talked to plenty of Latinos that voted Republican. They didn't generally give a fuck about immigration. They were quite happy for the borders to be shut down, where they came from, everything was very fuck you, I got mine. They're more than happy to pull the ladders up now that they're over here with their family to limit competition for those job sectors.

    They also vote Republican based on entrepreneurial and business wants. They either start small companies or work for small companies. And they see it as very much in their interest for those companies to prosper.

    I kind of suspect at this point that they'd be a bit apprehensive to vote Republican with all the Gestapo bullshit going on, still, but I haven't had any political talks with Latinos since Trump's first campaign. It's honestly hard to tell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Those are not the people that didn't vote afaik. Immigrants from mexico, central and south america tend to be more catholic and conservative. (Which is why its always actually been about racism) its generally younger latinos that will vote democrat but like all younger voters its more about turnout.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because they stole the source code to the election machines in 2020 and modified the software to cheat the 2024 election, subverting the will of the people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Everyone just sat out the vote???

    Basically, yeah. Because they didn't want to vote for the red genocide supporter, and they didn't want to vote for the blue genocide supporter; because no matter what, they're voting for genocide.

    I mean, in reality, most people right now in the US are just upset that US foreign policy has finally reach US shores.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sweet cherry picking bro. The comment as a whole responds to another whole comment, and here you are taking 5 words and making a whole reply about it. I’m sure Harris wanted to build concentration camps and strip the entire country of their rights, and tariff every country with a name too. You’re right, they’re both so bad you might as well just let Jesus take the wheel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    If she was so worried about Trump, why didnt she vocally oppose the US supporting genocide abroad?

    So, yes, she wanted concentration camps. Did you think she was going to shut down the ones Obama opened on our southern border, or did you think they magically disappeared once Biden got elected?

    Remember, she's the "top cop" and cops love oppressing the working class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They aren't afraid. They have the Department of War, and ICE to protect them and their property.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 37 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Exactly. Ultimately these people don't actually believe in anything other than power. Their arguments are in bad faith. Any compromise is just a temporary weigh station as they prepare to push even harder.

    How did compromising with the right work for abortion? Parental consent laws became onerous clinical regulations became bans on performing procedures became making getting an abortion legally murder. How did compromising on trans rights go? A few "reasonable concerns" about girl's sports became blanket bans on sports became bans on life-saving care for minors became restrictions on basic ID documents became attempts to criminalize the very existence of trans people. This isn't slippery slope conjecture; it's directly observed history.

    The simple awful truth is that we have fundamentally incompatible visions of the world. They see The Handmaid's Tail as an ideal to aim for. They think the literal God of the universe wants them to create this nightmare. And with God at their backs, they can justify any evil to create their warped utopia. Any action can be justified. Any lie can be excused. Any suffering by any number of people now can be balanced against the perfect lives they imagine we'll all live once they force us all into their dream world. The worst thing about them, is that they actually think they're the good guys.

    This is the fundamental problem. Their vision of an Earthly paradise is our vision of Hell on Earth. We have fundamentally different visions for the future. They cannot convince the majority of the population to willingly create their vision. So they have to resort to violence, disenfranchisement, propaganda, and fraud. (All justified for the greater good.) And ultimately we're going to have to use every tactic they use and more if we want to keep these monsters from turning our nation into Gilead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    "Those who make peaceful reform impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    The country went off-track when Reconstruction was defeated by white terrorism and the old slaveocracy retook their wealth and power. We've been struggling with the aftermath since then.

  • source
  • Is killing people that are openly declaring that they want to kill you even "political violence"? I would say it is not, because at that point you are not going after them because of their affiliation with any political party, but because they are trying to kill you.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    On track to what ..for fuck sakes?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And you think violence will get that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    No, I think the violence is a symptom, and that political violence is happening and we have to stop pretending it's not. This is the state we're in, no amount of crackdowns or "turning down the temperature" is going to change things

    If you look at the cause, it's obvious there's just going to be more and more violence. That's what happens when you make people desperate, and people are getting more and more desperate

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Actually, yes.

    The ruling class has such a stranglehold on power, the only way to take it away from them is to take it back by force.

    They will never give up willingly and have more than enough resources to make sure people like you are complacent in their abuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    That is right. "Which track" is always the needed followup question.

    Edit: Oh, actually great quote from article.

    The belief that violence may be the answer has grown among Republicans and independents – up 3 and 7 percentage points, respectively, since April last year. But the largest increase has been among Democrats. Now 28% of Democrats share that view, up 16 points.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is exactly how it's being orchestrated. Pit the people against each other so the politicians and wealthy can get away with literal murder.

    We are being governed by the "Epstein Elite", literal pedophiles and sex traffickers and the idiots that kneel to them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 73 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."

    • Thomas Jefferson, President of the United States, c. 1787

    Not that I think political violence (or violence of any sort, for that matter) should be our first, second, or even thirty-fifth resort, but at a certain point I think one must come to grips with the fact that - whether it fits in with their delicate sensibilities or not - when confronted with an existential peril it does sometimes become necessary to defend oneself. (Fun fact: This is why self-defense can be presented as a valid defense against murder charges!)

    Sure, we should absolutely make any and all attempts to be inclusive (Republicans HATE this!) and tolerant (GOP: hiss IT BURNS!) and attempt to reach solutions through education, research, negotiation, compromise and all that lovely (woke?) stuff, but... For some reason, it seems like there's consistently only one side that ever shows up to the table willing to actually do any of that. And that's just how it's been for fucking DECADES now. There's probably a lot of you (just generally speaking, not necessarily meaning Lemmy's demographic per se) who aren't even old enough to remember a time before the GOP began using "government shutdowns" and "debt ceilings" and "literal fucking coup attempts" as part of their standard, day-to-day politicking. Believe it or not (and I know this will probably be the hardest one to buy, but I swear it to be true) there was a time when the Republicans would - even if they WERE NOT in power at the time - STILL SHOW UP AND DO THEIR FUCKING JOBS. I know, what a concept, eh? Imagine going to work every day and just... doing your job, like a fucking idiot, instead of throwing absolute meltdown tantrums over your lack of control over other people's genitals.

    Does any of this strike you as the behavior of (an) entity(ies) engaging in anything even remotely resembling something that could be construed as "good-faith negotiation" - let alone even approaching something as audacious as "compromise?" This isn't a willing, eager party to an arbitration, quite, is it? No... Something more akin to an assailant with a knife at our throat(s) demanding to inspect our genitals to make sure we're where they think we should be at the moment certainly sounds more apt to me...

    I don't want there to be violence. Any. At all, really. But at what point does the moral imperative toward nonviolence get outweighed by the moral obligation to the people being kidnapped by masked (supposed) government agents and disappeared to very real, literal concentration camps? How many genocides at once do we need to hit the tipping point where it's finally acceptable to stand up and say, "That's enough. This far. No farther." But actually back that up, for a change.

    If that means by force, then unfortunately, so be it. Might doesn't make right, but that certainly doesn't preclude it from enforcing it, does it?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well, editorially, I suggest you break up those paragraphs into smaller ones, and maybe add some headings for a "wall of text" like that, but you make well thought out arguments and I totally agree.

    When it becomes clear that the citizens no longer have a controlling voice in choosing who leads us, that is when revolution is a valid choice.

    BTW, I'm one who is old enough to remember (like Pepperidge Farm - there, proof I'm old enough)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Ugh, I know it's a mess as far as the nuts and bolts go at a minimum (and we'll not get into any inherent flaws in my reasoning, thank you very much lol) but in my defense I had just recently woken up and was in dire need of chemical assistance, and I honestly didn't even think I'd gone on like I did but I was fired up! lol

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›