I don't see how this could be seen as anything but a violation of privacy and an attempt to chill free speech.

I had no idea there was a federal law regarding this!

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 1 year ago (1 child)

You know why Ohio has so many astronauts right? Because they can't wait to get the fuck off this planet after living there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Not to mention powered flight was invented in Ohio.

    Because people were flying the fuck out as fast as they could, Ohio stepped up its game with other inventions: speeding tickets and stop lights.

    It's no coincidence that cash registers, price sticker affixing machines and barcodes were all invented in Ohio too. You can try to leave, but you're gonna have to pay and it wont be easy. Ohio is also where vacuum cleaners and chewing gum were invented.

    Think I'm being ridiculous? Just wait and see!

    There's a variant of three-ring loose-leaf paper binders invented in Ohio. It's called a "Trapper Keeper". Think about it...

    The inventions of Ohio tell a bleak, dystopian tale if one reads between the lines. Interesting that Ohio brought the world freon and leaded gasoline along with gas masks...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    I would note that, to pick two examples:

    ExpressVPN appears to have California-based exit nodes:

    https://www.expressvpn.com/vpn-server/us-vpn/san-francisco-vpn

    NordVPN appears to have California-based exit nodes:

    https://nordvpn.com/servers/usa/sanfrancisco/

    You can effectively choose the state law under which you want to access the Internet.

    looks at Ohio meaningfully

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    From what I've learned recently, those may not be safe options.

    Best bet would be Mullvad, IMO.

    This video summarizes it well though it is a bit of a shill. I've actually taken the time to validate the claims made here and haven't been able to refute them.

    https://youtu.be/1opKW6X88og

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    There was a long talk on Linus tech tips with the CEO of PIA refuting that ownership by kape has any bearing on the operation of the service. With PIA open sourcing everything and allowing independent auditors into their datacentres to validate claims, the consensus is that they're just as good as any other provider

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    As someone in Ohio, it only requires an ID to watch porn online. I've been saving material since learning about the bill.

    I can imagine a couple hundred GB will last me awhile. Also after that, I can imagine. They can't regulate that yet.

  • source
  • 36 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 99 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 48 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    It may be small government but that's how they're winning.

    https://kindbridge.com/online-pornography-age-verification-laws-by-state-map/

    States with Active Age Verification Laws (25 Total)

    • Alabama - HB 164
    • Arizona - HB 2112 (effective May 2025)
    • Arkansas - SB 66 (effective July 2023)
    • Florida - HB 3 (effective January 2025)
    • Georgia - SB 351 (effective July 1, 2025)
    • Idaho - H 498 (effective July 2024)
    • Indiana - SB 17/Act 17 (effective August 2024)
    • Kansas - SB 394 (effective July 2024)
    • Kentucky - Law passed
    • Louisiana - HB 142 & HB 77 (first state, effective January 1, 2023)
    • Mississippi - SB 2346
    • Missouri - 15 CSR 60-18 (effective November 30, 2025)
    • Montana - SB 544 (effective January 2024)
    • Nebraska - LB 1092 (effective July 2024)
    • North Carolina - HB 8
    • North Dakota - HB 1561 (effective August 1, 2025)
    • Ohio - HB 96 (effective September 30, 2025)
    • Oklahoma - SB 1959 (effective November 2024)
    • South Carolina - Law effective January 2025
    • South Dakota - Law effective July 1, 2025
    • Tennessee - Law effective January 2025
    • Texas - HB 1181 & HB 18 (upheld by Supreme Court June 2025)
    • Utah - SB 287
    • Virginia - SB 1515
    • Wyoming - Law effective July 1, 2025

    States WITHOUT Age Verification Laws (25 Total)

    • Alaska
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Hawaii
    • Illinois
    • Iowa
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • Nevada
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • Vermont
    • Washington
    • West Virginia
    • Wisconsin
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It’s meant to be ironic. Government so small it fits in your pants.

    State governments can still be big and intrusive. This idea that small government means states can do whatever they want to abuse their citizens is a right-wing delusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 87 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Porn is an easy target. Gets the religious psychos on board with generalized internet censorship.

    They're building the Great Firewall of the US. Brick by brick.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    It isn't just religious nutjobs.

    "Porn addiction" is right up there with "seed oils will give you super diabetic cancer" in terms of the kind of stupidity that pervades both the left and the right. There is mass widespread vilification of masturbation and sexual health. Sometimes it is based on "God wants you to wear a hat and not masturbate". Sometimes it is based on the idea that pornography is inherently demeaning to women (there is definitely some fucked up shit out there, but the 00s/10s saw the rise of "chick porn" and onlyfans et al have continued along with the focus that porn can be good for more than just the dudes who want to see some hairy taint pounding away at an inflamed vag because ludes are cheaper than lube).

    And basically no influencers are going to stand up for it. Partially because porn is inherently competition for them (time you spend rubbing one out is time that could otherwise be spent falling asleep to ishowspeed reruns). And partially because they don't want to be vilified as "gooners" for... supporting sexual health.

    And yeah. Once the framework is in place it becomes REAL easy to extend it towards the real targets: LGBTQ+ content.


    As an aside, a couple months back I saw a REALLY wild thread on reddit about how men should sit down to pee and make sure to blot any urine with toilet paper. At first I thought it was just a bit but then I saw people lose their god damned minds at some (presumably) guy who explained that if you just give it a quick shake after you finish you are looking at a few drops, at worst, in your underpants and that is nothing. Definitely give it a rinse if you are about to engage in sexual activity but you aren't going to "reek of piss" all day.

    They went insane and insisted it is closer to an ounce. This led me down a rabbit hole of checking people's profiles (bursts of insomnia is fun) to see this is a regular argument and more or less coming to the conclusion that, at least for a good many of these people, it is not just a complete lack of hygiene. Which got me googling (actually asking chatgpt and then verifying once I knew what terms to search for) and you know what is associated with (medical term) leaky dick syndrome?

    That's right. Weak (again, medical term) schlong muscles. And you know the best way to exercise that? That's right! Kegels and ejaculation!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Yeah it's really easy for regressives to target sexual topics. Firstly, the private nature of such topics makes it difficult to defend both due to internal cultural shame and due to fear that when you speak up you will be discredited as someone who lacks that shame, a pervert.

    Then there's the fact that libertine lifestyles leave extra opportunities to be hurt. The price of freedom is the opportunity to make bad choices, the price of trust is that others have the opportunity to hurt you and some will.

    There is an intense revulsion to sexual harm and an added injury when it's experienced. In sex work including porn you add the opportunity for the ways in which labor is exploited and laborers are abused into sexual contexts and even the most class unconscious American instinctively feels that and it's easy to see it as inherently extremely evil and harmful.

    But even outside of sex work, sexually libertine lifestyles offer a lot of opportunities to be hurt. I say this from experience as someone who has been hurt in some of these ways on multiple occasions and has continued living that way.

    It's also very easy to sanitize the past. Every generation thinks they invented sex, except for the ones that grew up in a society where sexual freedom was normal, and they often don't understand why we fought so hard for it. They didn't watch as some of the adults around them growing up were slowly stifled by a life and a marriage that made them miserable. They demand a retvrn to a fictional world where the neighbors down the street not only weren't swinging but didn't want to and where there weren't porno mag stashes in the woods that the kids snuck readings of just as much as the dad.

    Idk maybe I'm just the slutty daughter of a straight woman who actually read playboy for the articles (and I gotta say as a lesbian, at its peak the porn wasn't half as good as the writing). There is value in the sexual and there is value in the unabashed adultness and rawness that can thrive alongside it. To sincerely speak to those who live differently from you but have been vulnerable in the way of admitting their more adult life, that is a rare treat for one to experience outside adolescence. I want a world in which the sex repulsed asexual, the monogamous couple, and the hobag are all free to live according to their desires, and banning porn is a clear attack on that world

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [+] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    Must be 18+ to watch porn

    Must be 18- to watch porn while sitting on the lap of one of these legislators

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You know what nuts? I live in one these states. Any time I want to view that kinda content I have to use a VPN. The fastest censorship free VPN? Cuba.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Great time to invest in VPN stocks

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    So they want people watching porn to be of certain age, but watching child porn is fine? Release the unedited Epstein files!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is some bullshit and I suspect as a person who grew up in ohio that it's generally unpopular. Ohio's population was always far more moderate than this

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Why do Ohioans accept this?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Do you want the real answer or a pithy quip that's suitable for a retweet?

    The zone has been so entirely flooded that I can't find Ohioans that know about this.

    Also, Ohio's age verification law was tucked into House Bill 96, the state's two-year operating budget bill that was over 3,000 pages long (specifically 3,156 pages). The provision appears in Section 1349.10 of the budget bill, which was signed by Governor DeWine on June 30, 2025.

    Unlike other states that passed age verification as standalone legislation, Ohio specifically "nestled" the age verification requirements into the state's operating budget rather than making it a bill in its own right.

    So it's not a matter of it being "accepted". Those shitheels just slid it in under the radar.

    Also, like that other person said, there are legitimately education challenges in Ohio.

    In the late 90s, the way Ohio funds schools was found to be unconstitutional, that is according to the state constitution not the US Constitution, and that has yet to be fully rectified but that's a whole other fucking can of worms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wait a minute‽ Other states don't have constant levies on the ballot for school funding‽ The lack of funding school explains so much about Ohio.

    Also the most important thing to understand about the Ohio government is that the supreme court makes their decisions then the state government decides if they'd like to enforce it. I love Ohio and am sad I had to flee, but Jesus goddamn fuck every law since the gerrymandering decision was ignored needs to be invalidated and everyone involved in ignoring it needs to be arrested.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    A level of gerrymandering that more or less makes you give up. Like, multiple constitutional amendments to stop gerrymandering but the legislature learned they could just run out the clock. This resulted in brain drain as progressive, liberal, and educated people left while conservatives flocked to a state with a purple economy and deepening red laws.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    So which Republicans own stock in VPNs?

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/ohio@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Mississippi here.

    I briefly experienced something kinda related, where I couldn't even watch YouTube videos unless I was logged in, to 'prove I'm not a bot'...

    Testing, testing, yay I found my testicles!...

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=k1BneeJTDcU

  • source