Also as I understand it, searching for content is really poor. e.g. https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/network/ says:

To allow you to discover potentially interesting content, Mastodon provides a way to browse all public posts. There is no global shared state between all servers, so there is no way to browse all public posts. When you browse Live Feeds > Other Servers, you see public posts from across the fediverse. Your server shows posts it knows about through various methods. Most posts come from accounts that other users on your server follow.

PieFed + Lemmy + Mbin has the same problem: someone must first join a community before it can be "discovered" by others on that same instance. Which typically means that someone must know about it - somehow? - via other means, and then go hunting specifically for it. I have tried to be the one who braved this trail for many a community on smaller instances such as Discuss.Online and PieFed.social (back when both were smaller than now), but not everyone - even scientists - are as technically minded as to want to deal with such complexities.

So if let's say some University decides to set up their own Mastodon instance, by default it will not know most of what is available out there in the wider Fediverse, and anyone using that instance will get frustrated when it seems so very empty to them.

And the voting thing. And the impersonation issues. And so very, Very, VERY many other issues as well. I am not trying to criticize Mastodon here so much as I am advocating that will people please open their eyes and have some EMPATHY: mainstream normies do not enjoy using Mastodon. This is what is driving them to BlueSky where they say that it is FUN to use. We can cry about it, whine about it, do all the purity testing that we want and downvote me for saying this, but at the end of the day these people will either remain on X/Reddit or else move to BlueSky, but they will not, they will not, THEY WILL NOT move to Mastodon. They do not want it, and at the end of the day their consent is actually required if it were to happen.

Eww gross, I just looked up what programming language Mastodon uses: it is Ruby on Rails and Typescript/JavaScript front-end. No wonder it is so slow to be developed!! (not so many people use those languages) PieFed in contrast is written using the extremely popular Python language (+ more pure HTML, some CSS, and JavaScript), so at this point I wonder if (a modified?) PieFed would be used more by scientists sooner than Mastodon if the latter will not be able to catch up to the former's pace of development? :-P

Celebrities are told by some people to go to Mastodon though? Perhaps they think that Bluesky being a more centralized server will not be prey to the issue of impersonation as Mastodon is? I do also think that the call to go to Bluesky is being received better. If you read articles espousing that call they are like "come check it out, it's so fantastic!" whereas the calls to Mastodon were like the calls to vote for the not-Right party in the USA each time that Donald Trump ran: "hey, Mastodon sucks, and let me list all the reasons why, but here's why you need to eat your vegetables even though you don't want to: X is so much worse (except it feels so good but... we really should do the moral choice, I/we don't want to but we should...).

People basically laid down the line saying: fix this handful of things and then I will join (perhaps that has just 2 items on it - the impersonation and discoverability issues - or perhaps there is more). But then Mastodon ignored that demand, and now here people are saying "can't you see what a nice man we are?" as if consent does/should not matter but it does! If we really want people to use Mastodon, teach yourself Ruby on Rails and Typescript/JavaScript and get busy making the implementation better to use - it's the only way, or else people are just going to use what (they think) already works: Bluesky.

Ask yourself why people all flock to the same platform. The network effect is real yo, and not to be brushed aside lightly.

Ikr? However that is not politically expedient hence major pushback exists to even do much as diagnose that issue much less deal with it. Even so, I (successfully) petitioned Discuss.Online to defederate from Hexbear.net, although in that I also asked for this instance to be removed from lemmy.ml as well, but that portion was rejected. Lemmy.ml is STRONGLY anti-Western, so whether its philosophies are correct or wrong (they are wrong imho:-P) either way it is a barrier for specially Western people who check us out and then nope out back to Reddit.

Even after that partial success though I basically gave up that idea since Lemmy does not allow for true blocking of all users on an instance, so nowadays use PieFed (which does offer that ability, as well as SO MANY other additional features) 99% of the time and only occasionally check my old Discuss.Online Lemmy alt. So at this point I've lost any hope whatsoever for "Lemmy" to become mainstream, but if there is even a sliver of hope left for that then I am putting it all in on PieFed rather than Lemmy. Perhaps I am wrong but I doubt it.

But it too moves slowly to catch up to being something that mainstream normies will want to use. I am making codeberg requests to try to help it along, even if I cannot contribute code directly. I understand the position of a mainstream person though: we here are fairly (and sometimes even extremely) toxic, especially to newcomers, and all the more so if they are non-techical. It would require much more extensive moderation to kick out people being mean to newcomers, which actually PieFed offers some great tools for that, and yet at the same time a level of traffic that makes coming to the Threadiverse worthwhile. Those two goals seem incompatible though, so realistically I don't expect it will ever happen. Still we have to try!?

I feel like maybe the Arab Spring, inspirational as it was, was half-baked. I believe it's possible that open broadcast microblogging system might have generated a sense of solidarity and community that exceeded the facts on the ground.

Yes but then what corporate master can I beg to and be met with silence when they eventually fuck me? Corporations fucking me is kind of my entire sexuality. How will it enshittify? I'm sorry but this all seems too much for me.

Sure, it would likely get very heavily defederated from or attacked, but it could happen.

No, we meant all professionals, we have seen journalists and actors be attacked. We aren't judging whether that was correct or not, just stating that is something which happens.

Edit: We just don't really believe in the concept of professionalism beyond it meaning someone gets paid for something. Thus the ' '.

People who want to run businesses through social media, Etsy sellers, artists for hire, youtubers, subreddits as a customer service avenue.

trackers? wdym? /genq

Thankfully you can just use another instance.

They banned a bunch of people including Jessie Gender (now reinstated) for mild criticism of the Harry Potter author.

They banned people for posting old (public domain) short films for fictional violence.

There was another ban wave when people were criticizing the hateful words spoken by that one guy who was violently killed.

There's an explicit promise of an upcoming wave of noncon artists. (I'm personally not a fan of such art but don't think they should be banned)

Some people have been reinstated, but the explicit focus on limiting speech has a real chilling effect.

I'm positive I've missed some from longer ago.