all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My worldview is disagreed on my many.

If you remove the few interested in only money and power, people, while collectively stupid, do care about eachother. We can and will collectively do great things not based solely on money, but connection and social upbringing.

Ultimately I think people except for the select few would rather see all of us in comfort rather than just themselves. There are some experiments that show this too.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I like that view. I am of the opinion that currency, while a successful solution to trading - when the buyer has nothing of interest to the seller, money and the valuation of both parties' skillsets can be an intermediary, allowing amicable trade for otherwise incompatible trade - it has long been used to cause harm through greed, exclusivity and control etc. and has caused widespread avarice and obsession. Few people seem to recall what community and life without this enamour and worry with currency was like. Before all land was claimed and monetised by those who claimed power, and before every human was financially and heavily indebted to the applicable governments simply for existing.

    Currency without malicious control shows promise. At some point society will need to figure out how to restart without currency becoming misused again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    the few interested in only money and power

    Narcissists. Narcissists who refuse to acknowledge their issues just need to be taken out back and shot. End.

    Every single problem with humanity can be traced back to narcissists.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have thought a lot recently about how every thinker in ethics and moral philosophy seems to think that only elites matter. The definition of "elite" can be narrow or wide, but fuck it seems like the most enlightened amongst us do not even realize ordinary people exist beyond in an theoretical, academic sense.

    People have various degrees of bigotry and stupidity, but you are 100% right that the vast majority of people just want to help each other and live a decent life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I disagree with the first part of your statement. Ethics and moral philosophy are why I have this worldview. The theoretical, academic and intellectual are how we improve that connection.

    Historically, (like before the 1900s) only the elite COULD afford to be academic. In modern times, the rise of public education has vastly increased the quality of life amongst the non-elite.

    Additionally, the modern elite are almost exclusively anti-intellectual. There is no professor in existence who would want their knowledge to be kept to themselves, there is no writer who wishes their works shared, for them to go unpublished.

    The modern elite are the anti-everything that keep us together.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    In my experience it's the boomers that base their own worth entirely on how hard they work.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How hard they work, or how many hours they punch in?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I was told it was actually a good thing that I'm currently doing the work of five people--while the federal government is still deciding we don't actually need to hire people--because everyone will notice and I'll definitely get a raise and a promotion.

    When I do get a raise and promotion it'll be because of the one or two more important projects I haven't been able to work on because of less important but more urgent tasks that I would normally delegate. So technically, I'm not even performing at my current level.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I also am of the opinion that discrimination based on intelligence is ableism, but I seem to be in the minority. Happy to be there.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I don't discriminate against idiots because they are idiots. I discriminate against them because they do idiotic things. Big difference.

    You can be an idiot all you want, just acknowledge it and stop doing things where your idiocy will harm people. Like voting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The questioneis where does worth come from

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Net worth can be positive or negative

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment