Fuck Charlie Kirk btw

all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They were fine with the things Charlie Kirk said until he died. Now it’s suddenly not ok to remind everybody of all the things he said.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    While pointing out these things is fine. You know the MAGAs genuinely don't give a shit about it right?

    You can tell them directly that they are two faced and they will just call you a slur.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 1 year ago

    You are correct. Nor am I under the illusion that posting memes online counts as activism. For all of our internet discussion, the only thing that really matters is what we do in the streets. (But I wouldn't post about those activities online.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, but we still need to make sure nobody can say "I didn't know" 10, 15, 20 however many years down the line when it turns out that everyone was always against everything the right is currently doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    Also, they spread racism homophobia etc and say how it is free speech and how "hate speech is a free speech" but now they are suddenly against hate speech, at least my experience from tiktok.

  • source
  • [+] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Free speech for me, but not for thee /s

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Lol at the 1 coward Magaloid down voting every comment

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    When the right wing says free speech, they mean they want freedom to say whatever they want, and also the freedom for us to say whatever they want

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    MAGA: I do not agree with what you're saying, and I'll defend your death for saying it

  • source
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There is a conartist, rapist, kiddie diddler in the oval office. Supporting him is wrong.

    Or

    Following and supporting someone from the mainstream media who continuously espouses hate speech is wrong.

    I guess I know where this will end but I'm open to be surprised.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    If there are as many people as the right says who want to kill for beliefs, I have to assume you are dead now and won't be responding. If you are not dead, either you and the right are wrong about how many people are willing to kill for your beliefs, or you both are lying for some purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    what about murder in war? is all the murder in Gaza wrong?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Sounds like a simple difference of opinion about gods if you ask me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Murder is ok if you're religious?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I haven't made any comments justifying murder. I just think it's weird how you think murdering people over opinions is always wrong when a Nazi dies, but when Israel comes up suddenly it's more complicated than that because of "irreconcilable religious differences"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)