top 53 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 122 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, codeberg, and it's going to be decentralized soon when forgejo implements federation

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yes, Codeberg/Forgejo or even self-hosting a git server. Git itself is decentralized and self-hostable.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Git itself is decentralized and self-hostable.

    This is true but Git is nothing like GitHub really

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The differences are all the parts you don't want anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Github is a way of quickly getting some indication that software is legit before you install it, because you can see at a glance various ways others have interacted with it, and potentially look into things further. If it's on Github the code is probably at least published, which is another sign of not being sketchy, so it's a good thing to be able to append to a web search. I also like that it's easier to find info about how to install software from Github than from some self published website for that particular software, because the information is generally going to be in the same place and use the same conventions every time.

    If you're only writing code for yourself, Git by itself would be fine, but there's definitely a need for something that is basically a sort of social media for software.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    @fajre @Codeberg ist "a non-profit, community-led organization that helps free and open source projects prosper. Our services include Git hosting (using @forgejo ), Weblate, Woodpecker CI and Pages."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Forgejo is an activitypub-enabled Git forge software, and codeberg is one of the largest forgejo instances.

    Tangentially related, but git-annex, and, in particular, its sync subcommand are a great tool for storing files and managing git repos across multiple machines (and even just loose drives) in a "P2P" way without any centralised server

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I self-host forgejo, it's one of the easiest systems I self-host.

    But which features other than a plain git repo are you looking for? That will mostly determine your options. There are tons of git repos, and even just a plain git repo on a server with an ssh tunnel is enough if you don't need anything beyond that.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    +1 for forgejo

    The only requirement of yours it doesn't hit is "decentralized", since you'd likely be self-hosting it. If you're looking to host git repos, you're likely technical enough to fire up a foregjo container in Docker and go wild with it. Just make sure you have a plan for backups, and you're good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, forgejo will give you many of the features of GitHub. Not the proprietary ones like the Actions Marketplace of course, but a lot of equivalent features. It's lightweight enough though that even if you never use it for anything beyond git, creating pull requests, and some basic CI, it's not going to require much power to run it.

    Do you need the public to have access to it? That would be the only reason for federation that I could think of. That's not available quite yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe not exactly what you are after, but: https://sr.ht/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Why not?

    • something like GitHub Check, only better because it also supports Mercurial
    • without big tech involvement Check
    • no data collection Check
    • no ads Check
    • open source Check
    • preferably decentralized AFAIK, only Forejo checks þis preference, and I'm not even sure how or how well it works

    But since it checks every requirement and misses only a preference, I don't know why it wouldn't meet OP's needs.

    Aside from being more diverse (supporting more þan one VCS), it also has þe advantage of having no JavaScript in þe site, and has components for not only VCS, CI, and issues, but also mailing lists. And it's composable - you install and run however much or little you need. It's not monolithic. Or, you can use þe hosted option and let sr.ht do þe maintenance work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    When I have questions like this, I tend to check this site first. You can also filter the results based on your criteria.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Git itself is that for the DVCS part, it's easy to host and is decentralized. I haven't used it myself, but hubzilla seems to support wikis and forums in a distributed way. If you needed to, you could manage issues in forums, although it feels like there should be somethings.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    • Forgejo
    • Gitlab
    • Gitea
    • Codeberg

    I'm sure there's more

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No one has mentioned Gitea yet, is there a reason? Genuinely asking.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Gitea has gone open core; it is still free software but its development is controlled by a for-profit company which is developing non-free features. So, Forgejo is the community-run fork of it which people outside the Gitea company are contributing to instead now. You can read more about their divergence here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I wonder when people (especially companies) learn that with open source projects, it's the community and contributors who are in charge and not the "owner". The moment you do something the community doesn't like, they'll fork the project, migrate, and your project is left in the dust.

    Few examples off the top of my head - CyanogenMod/LineageOS. Maps me/Organic Maps/CoMaps. OpenOffice/LibreOffice.

    If your company/business/project depends on user content, don't piss off the users.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    fossil-scm.org

    My new favourite tool.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    On server:

    git init --bare ~/projects/project.git

    On client:

    git clone username@server:projects/project.git

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    GitLab, I am not sure if their own installation hits all points (depends on what you define as "big tech involvement" maybe), but if you self-host it, certainly.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Try GitLab. They're independent and free of trackers according to Brave Shields. Though keep an eye out for the storage limits, since GitLab makes you quickly realize that, unlike GitHub, they don't have unlimited storage.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • I haven't tried it but Radicle sounds cool ? Radicle is an open source, peer-to-peer code collaboration stack built on Git. Unlike centralized code hosting platforms, there is no single entity controlling the network. Repositories are replicated across peers in a decentralized manner, and users are in full control of their data and workflow.

    There are some dev/repo tools, but I don't know how they compare with commercial platforms.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What's the benefit of a distributed git host? Are you just trying to distribute the storage costs?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I haven't tried it but Radicle sounds cool ? Radicle is an open source, peer-to-peer code collaboration stack built on Git. Unlike centralized code hosting platforms, there is no single entity controlling the network. Repositories are replicated across peers in a decentralized manner, and users are in full control of their data and workflow.

    There are some dev/repo tools, but I don't know how they compare with commercial platforms.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Is there something wrong with Gitlab?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Have not used it but there is also Pijul. It's not git based and uses another diff algorithm, not fediverse.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    worktree.ca

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Game of Trees - https://gameoftrees.org/index.html

    Not distributed but definitely meets other requirements.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’m not a git expert. If we Primarily use private repos and use gitea why would this be good ? I presume it’s only good for public repos right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] -13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No, because the people hiring and the people working with you will be using GitHub.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Speak for yourself. Being choosy with clients and jobs is a good chunk of the reason I work for myself, when I could instead be making/tweaking/re-designing the carbon-fiber exteriors for predator drones for about 3 times the income.

    I loved everything I saw of that workshop, except the clients and the end product. I prefer to be able to sleep at night.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    GitHub has ads? Unless you just mean them aggressively pushing copilot, but I don’t consider that an ad.

  • source