all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 1 year ago*

But the shareholders (tourists?)

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I had no idea people lived in Petra. I thought it was just a ruin

  • source
  • TIL the "discovery" of Petra was just western Europeans hearing about it again after the Romans, western and eastern, were building fucking churches in it and that we're at whatever stage of capitalism it is that gentrifies fucking Petra.

  • source
  • As someone who grew up in Dust Bowl country, if the indigenous people in the region stayed nomadic for umpteen thousand years, there's a couple few fukken reasons for it.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/news@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Government: "we must protect the remains of this dead culture"

    The culture, literally still there, trying to avoid getting killed by the government: "thefuck?"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    There is little place for them in Petra as it is transformed by a major development programme that aims to build new facilities, regulate an anarchic tourist trade and provide a better experience for the hundreds of thousands of visitors drawn to the ancient site.

    Sell, not protect. The opposite of protect.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Same.same.with Angkor

  • source