all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 1 year ago

As pointed out in one of the many other threads about this article — mechanical flush handles aren’t the problem. Motor-driven electronic handles are.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    During heavy rain, flush-fit door handles have short-circuited, trapping people in their cars.

    This whole thing roots back to Elon Musk being a twat.

    He had a habit, in the early days of his involvement with Tesla, of demanding some particular change to the design (and being able to make it stick because of his position) because it would be "more awesome" in his mind. There were a bunch of them, which wasted millions of dollars even back in those much smaller-scale days, and the whole "electronic door handles" thing is that. It's obviously worse in pretty much every way (among them cost, reliability, and safety), but he thought it would be awesome, and he's a self-important blockhead who can't hear any criticism, and so here we are.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Why do cars keep taking 2 steps forward, one step backwards?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Money. Charge for useless features, then charge more to let people buy out of them.

    Fuck the following:

    Flush door handles

    Tablet screens that are not integrated into the dashboard

    Motorized air vents

    Glove box doors that require using the infotainment to open

    A lack of keyholes or metal keys for at least one door

    Cars that cannot be put into neutral without power

    All the goddamn telemetry that you can't shut off

    Subscriptions for basic features

    Aaos in any car

    Gear shifters that are entirely non intuitive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I bought a 20 year old pick up with no radio, and I still feel like it has too many features.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Motorized air vents

    Excuse me say what? And here I am, mad as hell at modern vents that only shift a few degrees up/down, left/right. The vents in my 20-yo car and truck rotate 360° and open almost 90°.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It gives them something else to fix and make money on when it breaks. Traditional headlight bulbs are like $10-20 and easy to replace, but newer LED headlight harnesses and their replacement can be hundreds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    LEDs have so many superior properties and don’t burn out nearly as often though. I have a car with automatic matrix high beams and it’s a godsend for night driving. I would give credit where it’s due.

  • source
  • parent
  • 13 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 62 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It's interesting to see that China is taking this seriously and might ban them, while the US forgets more and more about "car safety".

    If China bans it, most manufacturers will have to follow their rules if they want to sell cars there, including Tesla.

    It's not much in the grand scheme of things but it's nice to see that at least one major country is considering this.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    They take this urgent issue so seriously that they will ban… new cars being made with this feature… by 2027! Great, after all only… peoples safety is in question!

    Its a step into the right direction, but are we really in a world where we are to celebrate common sense decisions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    2027 is only 1 model year away (2026 cars are already being sold). It took fucking forever for rear cameras to be mandated in the USA by comparison

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don’t get how that is comparably significant… Are the rear views of pickup trucks that obstructed?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    The whole truck bed and the height of the vehicle would obstruct basically a tons of stuff, making it a massive blindspot. Lots of accident/collision happened because driver reversed into someone/something.

    This sort of door handle, while it's unsafe in certain condition, is lower in priority than those that would cause harm to someone other than the driver. Eliminating blind spot should be in the top priority of automobile maker.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Its hardly surprising, the US has shit consumer protections and I would have presumed that attitude went for health and safety too.

    That said they can fit different handles if they wanted to, I am sure there are a lot of differentiators across markets.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Design over function was always a bad choice.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    Maybe I’m being too pedantic, but the headline is flush door handles, but the concern is electric latches and maybe electric handles. I wish newswriters care enough to be accurate.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Unsolving problems previously solved has been a staple of the (mostly EV) car industry for awhile now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    It’s been a staple of every industry.

    (Rant below)There was a period of time, not so long ago, when the vast majority of our daily activities problems were actually pretty well solved. The machines weren’t necessarily the most efficient in materials and energy usage, but they were reliable. And if they broke, most were simple enough to visually break down and understand their functions inherently.

    Then, the problem started when companies realized that they were making their stuff too sturdy. There was one legitimate crowd who wanted to cut down on the resource usage. They wanted to bring the devices away from maximization and down to moderation. I agree with that crowd.

    Then there were the exploiters. They saw this opportunity and ran with it. The cheaper you can make your product, just to work long enough for you to develop the next model, you could drip-feed your customers garbage year over year.

    This went the opposite direction and backfired on the legitimate crowd. Now we use three times as many resources as we once did because they treat everything made for us as expendable. Waste is a good thing to them. The more we throw away the garbage the sooner we replace it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Sooooooo pointless.

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/cars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    The issue isn't flush fitting handles, it's electronic flush fitting handles. I don't know who first signed off on that idea but they should have been slapped upside the head with a rubber chicken.

    It's trivial to design a flush handle that's all mechanical and isn't loaded with finicky electronics. Hell, those even show up on dishwashers now.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You have ford doing all sorts of weird stuff to recall over their mach e that has no exterior handles, no key cylinder. If you are outside the car and the car is dead, then you have to first get and wires out of the front bumper, then attach a jump pack to pop the hood, then remove some covers then jump the 12v battery, then you can open the door.

    Meanwhile I had both my fib dead and a dead car battery in my 2015, and I .. popped off the cover for the backup key cylinder and just opened the car ..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tesla was the first to make it popular in modern vehicles iirc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Lots of cars have had flush handles. Most early 2000 GM w-bodies did and those were common af. The silly electic ones may be what Tesla popularized at best... But even so a few cars had electric pop out, but flush handles. Perhaps its bad safety designs they've popularized.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    As much as I like the look of flush door handles, I don't like the idea of reaching my fingers inside of a thing that opens and closes electronically.

    How many miles of range would we lose by having regular old fashioned door handles, anyway?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    For Tesla model 3 and y, the handle itself is mechanical. You push on one side to make the handle pop out. If you do it right, the motion is similar to door handles with buttons: your thumb presses the “button” and your hand pulls the handle

  • source
  • parent