all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 218 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    The truly sad part is that it's still the Department of Defense, only Congress can change that. They're giving it a second name to puff themselves up, or is it to win the Nobel Peace prize when they eventually drop the new name?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The plan must be to flood our adversaries with vulnerable services so all their manpower is tied up in attacks on low-impact systems.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Doesn't defend!? They're straight up just posting the stream keys..

  • source
  • [+] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That’s why it’s spelled Froot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    It's spelled that way because Fruit Loops was too generic to trademark. There is a story about froot loops changing its name due to a lawsuit but that was proven apocryphal. There are other brands with this being a real issue that happened.

    In 2020 there was an Australian lawsuit with hopes to force Kellogg to change the name because Froot Loops had over the years become a slur for disabled people. It's failed.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    for those who don't want to submit their email: https://archive.is/8qkig

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    No one qualified wants to work with these clowns

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Dumbest administration, ever.

  • source
  • why the fuck would the intercept report on this and alert the government to it so they can fix it?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Obviously these are honeypots.

    /s

  • source
  • These people have nukes. ohno

  • source