Doesn't defend!? They're straight up just posting the stream keys..

Just look at the people in charge of the Democratic party. Especially the ones who are planning to die in office to leave behind a legacy.

They're just conservatives in sheep's clothing. They've done the bare minimum to seem left leaning, but they're currently clinging to power and are refusing anyone with "socialist" views to get any power. They've been blocking Bernie for over a decade, they're making sure AOC doesn't make big tweets that would overshadow their Newsom puppet, the DNC changed their rules to prevent new blood, etc.

Why would you even think otherwise? They're corrupt to the point where one of them has been openly shown and proven to accept bribes.

You can straight up rent a "mom", where a middle aged woman joins you for an event or similar while being nice and supportive.

Okay then, I guess if your kid has a terminal cancer we can also feed him to the tiger? After all in the end it's just a bunch of meat.

That's a weird comparison, and it's honestly a sign that you are struggling with separating the two on an emotional level. Which is ironic based on your opening sentence.

US intelligence confirmed within a week that Egypt had warned them repeatedly, and again a few days before the attack. So even if they missed it themselves(which is highly unlikely), they at a very minimum ignored the warnings.

And when the PM quickly called that "fake news", it should have been a pretty strong indication for most people.

Why do they frame it as rights? Let's start with not fucking killing them, I'm pretty sure that's a little more fundamental than rights.

Because traditional news have drilled into many people's head that there are no innocents there, at all.

Some of them are so delusional that they think phrases like "Stop killing children" is said in support of terrorism. It's honestly 1984 levels of brainwashing.

That was lost a while ago, but it's nice more people are noticing that it's getting worse.

The third one.

Paris Hilton isn't exactly a genius, but she's miles smarter than most of her "collegues" from that era.

There are about twenty different people that are speculated to be inspirations.

She was recruited by the CIA right out of school, speaks multiple languages, several tours in Iraq, worked for Bush and Obama, Security Councils, etc. and about a decade ago she was one of the key people in establishing Israels QME as US law(It's basically the agreement where the US gives them top-of-the-line weapons and technology).

I wouldn't believe she was on the side of starving children even if she sold everything she onws and went there herself and personally started handing out food.