I’ve been seeing this more and more in comments, and it’s got me wondering just how big this issue really is. A lot of people feel trapped in apps like Discord, WhatsApp, and Instagram, but can’t get their friends to leave.

It’s really annoying when you suggest trying something new, whether it’s a different app or just not using these platforms so much but sometimes it can feel like no one wants to go first.

So I’m curious, what apps do you feel most trapped in? And have you tried convincing your friends to leave them? What happened? Is it an issue for you, or are you just going along with the flow?

Looking forward to hearing if this is as common as it feels!

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 140 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's Facebook Messenger and Whatsapp for me. I ditched the Facebook app a long time ago, but Messenger and Whatsapp remain on my device because no one wants to leave them. I try to keep my chats there as superficial as possible.

Also, this is my first comment ever on Lemmy, so hi everyone!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Welcome. A reminder for in case you don't know, if it starts to feel stale, then it's probably because of your viewing settings. If you switch it from Active (ironically, the least active), to Hot, 6 hours, Scaled, etc. after you've gone through all of the new to you posts, you'll see a lot more action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    No one wants to leave because nobody is leaving.

    You're still on WhatsApp and Messenger, they can still contact you that way, so why would they bother changing?

    Pick a date, a week, a month, whatever, from now. Tell those you message regularly that you will be deleting all Meta apps on that date. Make it clear that that includes WhatsApp and Messenger. Explain why. I just linked some articles instead of having a long explanation but it still made it clear why.

    Let them know they can contact you via Signal/SMS/email whatever you use after that date.

    If the informed don't take the leap, the ignorant never will.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Welcome!

    Some tips:

    • You can block other users, other communities, and other instances yourself; you don't have to wait for the mods or admins to do that for you

    • If a mod or an admin of an instance choose to block certain things that you disagree with, you can sign up for another instance with your same name, assuming nobody's taken it; you won't be able to transfer your comments, votes, or posts though; there's been feedback given to the Lemmy devs about this

    • Search by Everything and Active to see new posts show up in your feed daily

    • There's lots of diverse opinions on Lemmy, but they tend to concentrate around politics and tech; maybe consider starting your own community or instance if there's something here you want to see!

    • To use the Discord analogy, Lemmy instances are Discord communities, Lemmy communities are Discord channels, and users are just users; we'll often write c/Whatever to refer to a community, but due to the Federated nature of Lemmy, you may find a community like c/Politics on multiple instances (like lemmy.world or lemmy.ml); not sure if the Lemmy devs have a fix for this

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 67 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Asking people to leave things means they're losing a line of communication to friends, family, and interest groups who still use those things. It's probably more productive to ask people to add the services you prefer rather than leave the ones they're used to.

    I've encountered some resistance from Americans who use iPhones and hate the idea of adding a third-party messaging app. None of them seem very interested in justifying that position.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Companies like Apple spent a lot to create a switching cost in almost every product. The "bubble" color is also a HUGE thing in the US, and is often times the sole reason for not wanting to leave iMessage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Certainly, but installing additional messaging apps on a phone has almost no cost on either iPhone or Android. It's interesting that iPhone users seem to dislike the idea more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The having to do something is the cost, because they have a perfectly good messaging app already, "why can't you just use that?"

    And that cost is more on Apple's platform because Apple has been designing it that way since the beginning. It's the whole reason android users got a different color bubble, not because they had to, but it was a way to identify the person that wasn't using an iPhone and make them stand out. Making it almost unimaginable to switch to Android for youth who care so much about not being "out" of the group.

    And Google has identified this, and put a lot of cringe-worthy effort into addressing it at their Pixel event this time around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    they have a perfectly good messaging app already, “why can’t you just use that?”

    Only running on one brand of phone would be the obvious reason here. Installing an additional app seems like a slightly smaller ask than buying a different phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    As someone whose only apple devices are ipads, the big lockin isn't imessage vs an SMS client. It's FaceTime vs, Zoom/GMeet/Jitsi. Mind you, it is nice being able to use iMessage with my wife when I have internet, and then swap over to SMS quickly. Sure, my two devices don't have a persistent conversation, but her device does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    FaceTime vs, Zoom/GMeet/Jitsi

    Is the advantage availability among your contacts, or something about the UX?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Holistically it's UX.

    If my wife or others in my life who use Apple want to contact me, they don't have to go into a specific app and hope that I'm looking at it. They can go into iMessage, click the camera, and poof, a video call starts up. The only software I use that does that otherwise is Discord, and that's not integrated with SMS/MMS. It's the connection too (which is just as much part of UX) - I've had problems with Zoom or others due to connection strength, but not with FaceTime.

    The fact that it's a "just-works" solution is important.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    they don’t have to go into a specific app and hope that I’m looking at it

    Do the others not ring your phone? I don't video call often, but when I do it's usually with Signal, and that definitely rings my phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Literally all of that UX is the same and better in other apps though.

    For example, every single part of your description applies to video and text conversations with my SO and friends, except we all use Signal. It "just works", and better than Facetime because it doesn't matter what device my SO and friends have.

    With Facetime it doesn't "just work" at all with the large number of people I know who don't have Apple. That's a huge disadvantage which means that Facetime UX sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Discord is a hard one because it has some uniqueness to it.

    It has bots, text channels, voice channels, and hundreds of thousands of people can join it if you need to.

    A lot of my college clubs use it and there are a few thousand students in our biggest ones

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's not unique, it's just XMPP + Mumble.

    I used to play with a large community and every time a new game would come out we'd always setup forum software, an XMPP (chat software) server and a Mumble server for that game. This was pretty easy to get done because we were all working in tech, but if you were an average gamer it wasn't something that you could handle.

    Discord packaged the text, voice and forum software into one application and they handle the server hosting. It only costs all of your privacy and $10/mo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You say it's not unique and then list the ways it's unique by packaging up multiple different services into 1.

    Totally agree it's a privacy nightmare but you discredit the service too much. There's a reason it's widely adopted the way it is, and it's not because it's the same as everything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    It isn't unique, it provides text, voice and video chatting. These are not new services to the world of technology.

    What makes Discord stand apart is that they require that your chats, calls and streams are not private and, in exchange for people giving up their private data the users only have to install one piece of software instead of two. It is like a company giving people a 'free' phone as long as they or their advertisers can listen into the calls, read the texts and look at the videos on the phone.

    The only thing that Discord does is to package the software in such a way that you can't access it until you give them information about you and then they gate features behind you identifying yourself with a credit card and a phone number.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    It's because our marketing sucks. People don't care about their privacy, they like what is cool. So what does that mean? It mean we gotta make using open source app so cool that people can't help but join because all the cool kids are here. You feel me? Preaching alone is not enough although it will benefit all of us

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Networking effect

    People use whatever is most popular even if its the shittest thing such as Facebook.

    Only time people will care is when it personally and tangibly affects them.

    For Facebook/whatsapp watomatic can be used to remind people you are leaving or such.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I less have an issue with people getting trapped in software they understand is insecure, and more with people who will push shit like telegram and pretend its the most private and secure thing ever invented. If they want to use discord, sure, fine with me. As long as they know not to do their activist work on discord I'm fine with it. People doing activist work/planning over telegram will never make me not cringe.

    Signal isn't something I personally want to use, but its tolerable, and it was doing a good job of replacing telegram in activist spaces I felt, but I've recently seen a few different groups using telegram again because they don't trust signal.

    xmpp with omemo is what I wish I could get people to use but uh, well, that just will never happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    How do you set up XMPP with OMEMO as anonymously as possible? My friend and I would love to video call each other, currently we're using SimpleX for this, but it's very buggy. We use Molly for calling and SimpleX for texting, both of us are switching to using Libreboot laptops with QubesOS to communicate :)

    I love teaching my friend privacy. He's really gotten into it, I've done a good job making him just as paranoid as I am!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm gonna be honest, its been so long since I've actually had people to set it up and use it with that even I would need to spend a day and a half figuring out how to set it up again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    People don't typically like change. It has to feel like it's their decision to drive them there.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Not really. I have none of those apps or alternatives. and I don't know anyone I want to chat with on Discord, WhatsApp, Insta, or other. Not that I'm antisocial, I just have no interest. Lemmy is about as close as I want to get to anyone. Before, it was Reddit, but they have tanked as a place to search for knowledge.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    so refreshing to find likeminded people here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Also, it's so refreshing to find real people here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm also older than Methuselah, so that might be a factor. Back when the internet was young, it was interesting talking to real people. However, in today's timeline where I have to slog through all the bots, all the assholes, all the individuals with an agenda or ax to grind, I just find it tedious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What are some good alternatives to discord?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    matrix works pretty well as a discord replacement, it's sometimes unreliable when you're using a selfhosted instance but I'd wager it'd work smooth enough for a non techie if you turn off end to end encryption

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    imo the biggest appeal is decentralisation and non corporate ownership, ofc the matrix people are trying their best to do e2ee and whatnot but iirc media isn't encrypted e2e and it's inferior to signal or whatever

    also for a large fraction of discord's usage (large open access guilds) encryption doesn't mean anything

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago*

    Network effect and the path of least resistance.

    People usually resist change until there's a net and obvious gain, or when thing don't work as expected anymore.

    And you need to consider that what's important in a messaging platform for someone, might be vastly different for another.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, this is so fucking annoying. I've been banging on about Signal for years, but everyone except a small handful of my wisest friends insist upon using WhatsApp and Discord.

    Almost everyone I know also uses Instagram, and no other social media. I am yet to meet someone in real life who even has Mastodon.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Probably the idea of "all my other friends are on the mainstream platform so why would i move to another platform specifically for you?"

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I have the same issue, but got 2 Discord users to try Jitsi Meet with me (a friend of mine on my Snikket server invited her friend). After a while, her friend asked me why it looked so much alike Discord and my friend agreed. I gave them a big smile and said, "because this is awesome".

    Jitsi Meet + Snikket has been my saves since I deleted my Discord account during the pandemic.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I loved Jitsi too, though, the call quality was a bit low quality when I used it previously (browser version I believe). The only problem with Jitsi, is how do you set up a server?

    For example, Professer Messer has a Discord server, but a lot of people use the chat rooms for conversations, and there a lot of other study sessions taking place in different voice channels. I really wonder what the other alternative to Discord is. Mumble won't do since I don't think it has the ability to screen share.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I find the quality very good. And there's no problems with setup a "server" :)

    1. Go to the preferred Jitsi Meet server.
    2. Enter the meeting name (as it really called) or just press enter to get a random name.
    3. Enter your details and options (mainly mic on/off and webcam on/off).
    4. Enter the meeting. If you're the first one in it, you're the moderator.

    Once inside and as a moderator, you can create so called breakout rooms. These works just like subchannels in Discord. If you're many people in 1 call, you can create these to create a more calmer experience. I have personally not tried these out since I have only talked to 1-2 people.

    Mumble is a excellent VoIP software, but like you said, screen sharing is not possible since Mumble is just what VoIP means: voice over IP.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    SMS

    Nobody wants to use a messaging app at all. At this point I'd rather be stuck on WhatsApp. But its all family. Big family and try to get them to agree on anything is like pulling teeth.

    I even sent everybody a "contact card" I made with my links to signal, simplex, and even whatsapp (figuring that's the path of least resistance) saying I'd prefer to communicate on any of those apps. ZERO people changed nor did they even ask about it, options, or my reasoning.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I did a similar contact card thing for (real) people I cared about from Discord. 2 people installed signal to keep up. 20+ invites went out before I nuked they account. One person already had signal. The other one that installed it now ghosts all my signal comms attempts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "privacy? Yeah whatever, they just use it to catch bad people right? I have nothing to hide. I don't have the time to learn all this VPN stuff. Don't forget to like my posts!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Get their parents to sign up. Feels like grannies sharing minion memes and Bible verses was the end of facebook's cool era.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The inconvenience of switching and learning a new thing is the largest deterrent. People complain but don't care enough due to those reasons to switch.

    I only text people on Signal, except the old grandparents or potential new friends that I will in time get to switch to Signal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • The inconvenience of switching and learning a new thing is the largest deterrent.

    Honestly, oftentimes it's not evem that, it's the perception of learning being difficult.

    I have some friends decided to pay hundreds of dollars to hire a plumber for something pretty simple to fix. As in, it'd take $50 and an hour once you factor in learning and practice runs. And they're always complaining about not having money, yet they got mad when I told them how easy it was

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Because people keep pushing for them to completely leave a platform.

    Instead try to get them to dual-use platforms.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    This is the way. I this case they get to "feel" those other options themselves, and even if you are the one that put that seed in their head, they are the ones making that final decision based on their own needs, capabilities and preferences.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    One of the big problems nowadays is proprietary protocols. Back in the day, you could have a single client that could talk to different networks. Today you have to run a bunch of separate apps, and what's worse is that a lot of them are built with stuff like Electron that's resource hungry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Even the FOSS apps don't all get along.

    Conversations is great for XMPP, and it can act as a UnifiedPush pusher, but AFAICT it doesn't support other protocols and it doesn't act as a UnifiedPush subscriber.

    So running 2 chat protocols, one being the well-support app Conversations on the well-supported protocol XMPP, means 2 push setups and 2 apps. Bleh.

    I would like to see an architecture where the expensive app side of things is separated from the protocol. But that's all speculative, I haven't put work hours into it. Basically, if I have an idea for P2P chat, why do I need to re-invent emojis and channels and shit like that? I only want to iterate on transport. And if I have a better idea for channels, why would I have to re-invent the transport like XMPP and Matrix?

    (The reason is that cutting those two apart is hard - But I will continue to wonder.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Oh yeah the whole thing is a mess. It kind of blows my mind that we still don't have a single common protocol that at least the open source world agrees on. Like there is a more or less fixed set of things chat apps need to do, we should be able to agree on something akin to ActivityPub here as a base.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Discord for me. A bunch of my family and friends are avid gamers. Discord is the universal standard app they all use for general communication.

    Not only do they use it for all their gaming related stuff, they have additional servers and channels for just chilling, chatting, off topic stuff, memes, politics, etc etc.

    It's the network effect. Even if there was an open source app that perfectly replicated all the functionality of Discord and was just as simple to install and run as Discord, most of them still wouldn't switch to it, because all of their friends and family are still on Discord.

    So they would have to have two completely separate apps with totally separate social groups to maintain, and nobody but hardcore advocates for FOSS and privacy are willing to do that.

    Sure, I have Discord, Matrix, IRC, Signal, XMPP clients, and a Private Mumble server, all on my systems, but I'm hardcore about FOSS. None of my friends and family are willing to do that. It took all my energy to convince two of my most techie friends just to get Signal on their phones. And only One has been willing to install a Matrix client to chat just with me.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Threaten them with having to communicate with you using email - they'll install Signal 😂

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I don't have very many friends, although of the ones I do have the majority of them use Signal, or are terrified of recent politics and I'm trying to move them over currently. I'm not concerned about platform lock-in for communicating over proprietary platforms since if something happens we can just move, I am concerned about the security implications.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's network effects. People have other friends on the network who have their own friends on the network, and so on. Leaving the network means convincing a critical mass of your network to leave along with you.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And it would be easier with good bridges, but of course the big platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc., refuse to bridge in or out with anything.

    You can scrape public Facebook feeds, using paid services, but AFAICT you need a friend on the inside to publish your stuff into Facebook.

    I guess that's one reason I shouldn't complain about Bluesky - They support Bridgy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • These are just opinions, but here are the two I know about (I don't use WhatsApp)

    Discord: It's not just you. You would have to get their other connections, all their servers, and all the connections from those servers to switch. Frankly speaking, Revolt isn't ready for that to happen. You are one person. I'm sorry, but if I have 1 friend vs. all of my servers and friends, I'm not going to make a meaningful change for the one person. And tbh I'm more likely to be the one than the many. What I would suggest is to try and put yourself between the two services, help to build the communities you want to see, then invite people over.

    Instagram: Same issue as Discord. The fediverse doesn't have the variety of content, the wide range of users, or half the stuff to engage with.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Cory Doctorow refers to this as the Anatevka problem.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Comfort and scared of change. The dopamine these sites give you is close to sex for some people as weird as it sounds. So if you tell them to stop using Instagram, they can't process that and simply say no.

    This is just part of human nature. Some of us are able to say "hey this website is run by horrible people and I refuse to support it." We leave and find other options and help them grow. We are in the minority.

    Most people simply do not want to try something everyone else doesn't use cause they don't want to seem weird. Stupid societal norms.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I convinced my friends to get Discord so we could communicate as a community without Facebook. Now I have figured out it is just as bad. I tried Matrix and couldn't figure out how to log in before I heard it's enshittification is underway.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Endhittification is often the result of an established centralized platform that got that way via giving unfairly good deals because they had a lot of investment becoming suddenly greedy and controlling to make that money back. Matrix, meanwhile, is just a protocol. It quite literally cannot be enshittified unless the protocol is updated to do something a certain way that benefits the developers over the users, because a user can simply switch providers. Even though the org that develops it is also a provider and I hear they're going freemium, that is a service that costs money to render. I'm not surprised they need more money to offer hosting and maintain the software behind it. Unless the protocol is being modified in a way that hinders or scams us or steals our data, saying matrix is enshittifying is like saying email or HTTP is enshittifying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • So then it is still worthwhile to try to host a matrix server? Cool. I guess I need to get the login part figured out so I can try it first. I think DBZer0 has one I can try. Thanks for explaining. I am in a hurry to try it now so my friends have yet somewhere else to go.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I had my wife and best friend using signal until they dropped support for sms. Switching between apps was too much for us.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Switching between apps was too much for us.

    I've heard this from a few people, but I have trouble understanding it. Perhaps its because I've never had the experience of being able to send text messages to all of my contacts in one place, but the effort required seems pretty insignificant to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    People will still use discord even if it got entirely banned, there just isn't a good alternative now that is clear

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Not federated but a pretty good alternative coming up with Revolt - still has a good way to go though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Interesting.

    What’s the catch? Is it all self hosted? If not, where’s the hosting cash coming from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Revolt would be good, but they lack screen share, that really was the only reason why we didn't keep using it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Lol, what because you tried Matrix and it SUCKS on both client and server?

    XMPP can have a whole ass facebook app built inside it called Movim and it can be accessed from any "homeserver". It can be far more than Discord will ever want to be, if the cats can be herded

    If you don't use Matrix well I guess bc it's ubiquitous among squishy Linux and leftist communities for some godawful reason despite being Israeli-developed, US state dept funded, and idiot-maintained. They even have a slot for it on these lemmy accounts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    For me it's Discord, I can't find a good enough self hosted alternative with all the features me and my friends want.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    This is a big one. I had no problem ditching the rest and I've been able to slowly get friends and family onto signal. But discord despite its incessant enshittification just has no real alternative. Matrix is the closest thing and it's a clunky, confusing mess.

    Plus even if I were to switch, what's the point if the communities I use discord for aren't moving too? They really built a monopoly out of this dogshit app and it's going to be ridiculously difficult to get people to switch to anything else. Hell, look at Twitter - people clung to that shithole for far too long (they still do tbh), and didn't jump ship until bsky came around, which is barely any better. Meanwhile, Mastodon's literally been there the entire time but nope.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Matrix is the logical successor to discord.

    We should focus on improving it instead of making something new from scratch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Only if the people behind Matrix just copied the Discord UX exactly instead of making weird choices nobody can understand

    We need a “server” with multiple channels that are easily discoverable for everyone on said server. We also need to be able to gate channels behind roles.

    Can it do that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Pretty sure you could do all that on matrix in 2023, maybe not the gated roles, but you can just make a subgroupchat

    you can even this on telegram to an extent

    discord delenda est

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just missing like 90% of the features and UI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I wouldn't say Matrix needs 1:1 feature parity with Discord in order to be a viable alternative for a lot of users.

    My social circle doesn't typically use the entire suite of features in Discord. Text chat, voice chat, video calling, file sharing, and screen sharing cover our usual needs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Can't speak to the other apps but I have like 6 or 7 Discord servers that I'm actively involved in and a half dozen others I use sporadically. Even if I got all my friends to switch apps for our group chat I'd still need Discord for the servers I use and I'd rather not juggle two apps that are doing the same thing (actually already doing this with Discord and a text group chat and it's annoying as fuck). Also, switch to what?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Because everyone else they know is there. If the people they follow and interact with moved to Mastodon or switched messengers to Signal, you’ll see how quickly they will move. It’s hard to convince someone to sign up or install a new app if it’s only you they’ll find there. I was able to switch my family over to Signal and they literally use it only for family group chats, because they don’t know anyone else who uses it. And they were a little easier to convince because they’re family. I won’t be able to convince people with less close ties to me like friends, acquaintances, and neighbors.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    People can’t be convinced of anything, it’s a losing battle to try. The only way to get people to change is to live a certain way and if people admire it, then they ask you about it and you share.

    So for example-I’m a minimalist and I really wished my sister would declutter because her place is overcrowded. But instead of trying to convince her, I just shared what my life normally was like. Eventually she asked me for help decluttering, and she felt a lot better about what I helped with. Now we share cleaning and organization tips.

    For me, I just put in my insta bio I left for Pixelfed and to come friend me there.

    I’ve told my friends I’m off insta because I’d rather be on a platform where I control my feed that’s ad free. And that I rarely see my friends content on insta so it doesn’t matter that much to me to have friends on there. If they get interested, great if not, I’m still happy.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›