cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40892139

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40892136

It's amazing to me that we can still find new heavenly bodies within our own solar system in 2025. Not to mention the possibility that we have data that suggests there might be yet another beyond Pluto, but that's still speculative.

Science: one of the only topics that doesn't suck in 2025.

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Non-paywalled story: https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/webb/2025/08/19/new-moon-discovered-orbiting-uranus-using-nasas-webb-telescope/

Look at that amazing photo! Hubble struggled to even get good photos that made the rings visible. I'm sure there's some IR or false-color going on in this, but the state of JWST's optics is just incredible.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    It's an emoroïd

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    never gets old

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Please name it Dingle berry

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I knew it! I kept feeling something there sometimes.

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think it's more amazing that we can find what we have given the size of space. And it would be both incredible, unbelievable, and a bit concerning if the farthest objects we've found are all there are. There's no reason there wouldn't be a lot more, they're hard to find, and why would there be an empty spot between them and the Oort cloud (which is WAY out there, not something we've actually seen).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Oh that explains the gravitational pull I’ve been feeling on my ass.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Mirrored version:

    https://archive.ph/Qmps3

    This is pretty cool! Didn't think there would be much left to discover in-system, at least without visiting the planets.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    ‘Tis just but a hemorrhoid.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Dang, I'm not used to so many beautiful names orbiting it!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    This never gets old.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/science@lemmy.world view that post

    That's it, this is my best science news for the year. Nothing is going to top finding a new moon.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago
    [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    We must know more. It is imperative that we send a probe to plunge into the moon of uranus!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    You are so fat there's a moon orbiting uranus.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/science@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Non-paywalled version from NASA

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I mean, depending on you definition of heavenly body there are thousands of asteroids we don't know of and probably hundreds of dwarf planets. And I don't even know if we've ever seen anything in the Oort Cloud or if we just suspect it's there.

    The Vera Rubin telescope will surely reveal thousands of objects we didn't know of before.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yeah .. I bet they did...

  • source