top 59 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 218 points 1 year ago* (23 children)

The raid is part of a “national security investigation in search of classified records,” a person familiar with the matter told NBC News.

FBI Director Kash Patel tweeted “NO ONE is above the law… @FBI agents on mission” at around 7 a.m. ET, the same time his agents reportedly arrived at Bolton’s home in Bethesda, near Washington, D.C.

Then if someone were to be caught with classified records in the bathrooms and poolside storage rooms at Mar a Lago, they'd be facing some serious legal consequences, right? No one is above the law, right, Kash?

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 104 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    That's not what they're looking for...

    The only reason they'd raid Bolton is if they thought he might be holding onto an "insurance policy", likely Epstein related.

    I think a lot of people who worked around the Epstein shit is gonna start getting raided.

    They want to release their doctored version, and they're trying to make sure no one has what they've redacted before they release it.

    Logically, there aren't many other reasons for this...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Remove tinfoil before opening mouth.

    This is much simpler: Bolton opposed Trump, therefore he is an enemy of Trump, therefore an enemy of the state, therefore a legitimate target for harassment through law enforcement. Same way if in Russia someone opposes Putin he will have goons come after him. It all discourages any kind of opposition, because most opponents will go away if you just trash their house or beat them up a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    It's right out of the autocracy handbook. The orange is intimidating and soon getting rid of his opposition one raid at a time. And every raid sends a clear message to his enemies and allies: "Do not oppose the Czar."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    You think as much as trump is freaking out about Epstein...

    That he's just going after random people who aren't actively causing him problems?

    He's simple minded, and there's a lot of pressure to release more info. If he releases something, and says it's everything, anyone that might have retained information from prior to Joe Biden's presidency is a threat.

    Bolton could have literal.proof about what the government had prior to Biden, saying that's the likely motivation isn't "tinfoil" it's Occam's razor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)
    1. What makes you think John Bolton would have anything Epstein-related?
    2. What about the many, many other individuals Trump has targeted with the DoJ and other branches of government? Do they all have an Epstein-related "insurance policy" as well?
    3. What makes you think Trump is "freaking out" about Epstein? He has said several things disapproving of the intense interest in Epstein, but that's not enough to make me think that any time he abuses the government to target his opponents it must be because of that.

    This is like all conspiracy theories: you've got a pet idea that would be exciting if it were true and so you're minded to ignore any alternative explanations for the facts.

    If he releases something, and says it’s everything, anyone that might have retained information from prior to Joe Biden’s presidency is a threat.

    What's to prevent him from saying they've fabricated it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)
    1. Because ever since Kissinger the national security advisor has been the conduit between the president and intelligence agencies. And Bolton was in that position when the FBI opened the safe at Epstein's place. The one filled with video and electronic files that somehow "disappeared".

    2. If I said a rectangle was a square, would you say that's only possible if every rectangle was a square?

    3. Reality...

    Now, one question for you:

    1. What about America in 2025 makes you write off every conspiracy as fake? You know there are real life co spiracies every fucking day? Are you expecting people to just give trump the benefit of the fucking doubt that he wouldn't pull a conspiracy? It hasn't even been five years since he fucking cnspired to overthrow the USA government resulting in a real life insurrection. But this is too out of pocket for you? You can't imagine Trump's administration would do that?

    Come the fuck on...

    If you don't understand still, nothing else I ever say will help you. Best of luck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Because ever since Kissinger the national security advisor has been the conduit between the president and intelligence agencies. And Bolton was in that position when the FBI opened the safe at Epstein’s place.

    The "conduit"? Correct me if I'm wrong but the National Security Advisor isn't out kicking in doors when the FBI go on raids. The FBI is not an intelligence agency (it has an intelligence branch) and being the "conduit" doesn't mean he has the ability, inclination, foresight or skullduggery to gather such "insurance policies."

    If I said a rectangle was a square, would you say that’s only possible if every rectangle was a square?

    If you said that on a specific day the sun rose because you had prayed really hard for it to pray the previous day, I would be asking you what about all the other days when it rose without your apparent intervention.

    Reality…

    Not good enough.

    What about America in 2025 makes you write off every conspiracy as fake?

    I'm calling out your conspiracy theory thinking. Target John Bolton with an FBI investigation is a conspiracy, is a fascist abuse of power and is not, in any way, giving Trump "the benefit of the doubt." But it's not conspiracy theory thinking, because there's no super secret bullshit that only a select few are smart enough to work out - it's the regular kind of secret stuff that we can infer based on facts and evidence.

    To believe your story I have to believe that there's a high chance John Bolton has "the Epstein list" and has kept it as insurance. You have given me no reason to believe this except that Bolton was head of - not the FBI, not the DoJ, but the National Security Council. So what? On the basis of such weak evidence you'd be saying that thousands of government officials have Epstein related "insurance".

    You're not, though, because you're not actually basing this on any thought process which takes evidence into account.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Bro. What do you gain when you investigate? Intelligence, you're being obtuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why are you joining this comment thread to do something other than offer an actual reason to believe that Bolton has an Epstein-based insurance policy, when this investigation is adequately explained the same way all of Trump's other retaliatory abuses of power are explained?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Clearly because you're being obtuse and I wanted to alert you to that fact things like saying the FBI a department under the usint isn't an intelligence agency.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_Intelligence_Branch

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community

    Your local sheriff thanks to fusion is part of the intelligence community, ie. You're being obtuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If OP is saying that the likelihood of John Bolton having snagged a copy of the Epstein files in 2019 and used them as an insurance policy against them one day being released in modified form is in the same region as that of some random sheriff, then there'd be less contention.

    It's not obtuse to point out the distance between John Bolton and a particular FBI raid. Indeed, it's being obtuse to say how they're linked in some game of six degrees of Richard Bacon when the point is that the mere fact of their being in slightly overlapping circles doesn't in the slightest way imply that Bolton both was able to and actually did make copies of evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    No one said that has to be the scenario, you literally just made that up.

    It is, it's literally his job to know what effects national security and that includes compromat in fact that's the historical basis of the FBI's intelligence involvement. There's no six degrees, it was his job and history has taught us incidentally and accidentally withholding classified documents is fairly common with cabinet and committee members.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Exactly. This was sending a message, not to Democrats, but to Traditional Republicans who might be considering opposing the MAGA takeover. There is no Republican Party, it's the MAGA PARTY now, so get on board, or else!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    What would Bolton have had to do with the Epstein materials? He was National Security Advisor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Epstein being Mossad would be national security related

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Some of you have gone off the deep end.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    With this administration, anything is possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think what he's saying is that the simpler explanation is that Trump hates people not sucking his dick and regurgitating his bullshit statements. Bolton has been doing the rounds and not following the trump line. So now trump hates him, which means the regime hates him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 85 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Bolton is a massive piece of shit and he deserves to be eaten by the monster he helped create. That said, this is still wrong. Prosecuting critics is not an acceptable fascist escalation just because the target is a fascist. If John Bolton doesn't have rights, then neither do you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago

    Weaponization of law enforcement isn't on any fascism checklist, is it?

  • source
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago

    Bolton turned against trump.

    Cash Patel and Bongino are protecting trump.

    EPSTEIN

    EPSTEIN

    EPSTEIN

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    John Bolton goes on a lot of shows, YouTube shows, and podcasts criticizing trump. They’re going after critics now…

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think we need to call it what it is now - a purge.

    Purges can be both violent and nonviolent. I'd argue that the Trump administration is purging through deportations, litigation, and now raids against detractors. Likely, this style of purging will only escalate towards more violence through the legal system until it reaches an explosive, physically violent moment. We're not even a year into his term...

    We've seen this all before. History doesn't repeat, but it often rhymes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    We’re getting closer to the night of the long knives

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Perhaps coincidentally, I heard that there have been an unusually large number of rumors of a purge in Russia, from sources who usually don't comment on such things. I wonder if Trump is just trying to be like his daddy figure?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I wonder if the people doing the raiding ever think "hey wait a minute... What's to stop them from doing this to me in the future"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    These aren't FBI agents, these are newly recruited thugs and sycophants abusing their power. Patel is going to do a number of these things to various people Trump doesn't like and find nothing, OR they'll start dropping manufactured evidence and try to keep people in custody.

    Point is, this is ramping up fast, and it's finally here. If it only stays as an intimidating tactic to shut people up, that would be shocking. I expect planted evidences, and the whole shebang before a judge stops this. They're probably getting warrants from Aileen Cannon or some bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Planted evidences? Yeah most likely, also probably will be something small and unrelated to the case but enough for a judge to glue it together with a hefty sentence.
    (Simplified example: weed on the premises -> supporting drug trafficking -> supporting violent gangs -> danger to the usa)
    Heck, his book alone might be construed as anti trump, anti presidential so therefore anti USA and dangerous.

    A judge stopping it? Nah, none of them will, and if one might think it's ridiculous enough to pull on the brake he or she will be overruled by an appeals court. The law is Trump and trump is the law.
    (so hey, if he IS the law he can never be above it ... nor below...)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Damn, that's crazy. How about them EPSTEIN FILES tho.

  • source
  • [+] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "No-one is above the law" is blatantly untrue though isnt it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    John Bolton is a staunch imperialist who should've been in jail for his role in bush era war crimes and corruption. He collaborated with the first trump regime then had the gall to complain that their actions may not have been entirely above-board.

    If he ends up in jail for running afoul of his ideological proteges it would be as close to poetic justice as we get under fascism.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is what fascism does and why it never lasts. They all turn each other because there's no trust, only power and pettiness.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Man

    Trump's purges of former political allies turned enemies is boring as fuck. Like shit, Heritage Foundation might be the influencers of Nazis, but they certainly are worse than Nazis in every meaning of the word.

    If he's going to screw us all at least give us a show or get us off you know?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I heard this on the radio this morning and could have sworn they called him Michael Bolton and could not tell if they were doing an office space bit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So bolton clearly has a copy of the Epstein list

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    My money says this is about the Epstein files.

  • source
  • I just hope this leads to us finding out what he looks like under the ridiculous fake glasses, nose, and mustache.

    Okay, the glasses might be real, I'm not entirely sure on that one.

  • source
  • 45 comments in c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world view that post