all 56 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 149 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 123 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    This has gotta be satire, right?

    ....right?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 114 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    With LinkedIn it’s impossible to tell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    Every time I see something this funny on LinkedIn, I remember that it would be an insult to the creative genius of the satirist who wrote it not to laugh react it. Have I laugh reacted something meant seriously? Probably, but it's for the greater good.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago

    I need this to be satire.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago

    Jfc this HAS to be satire. No one is this dumb. Wait yes they are. But still.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    He even wrote that with ChatGPT 😭

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    By including AI in the equation, it symbolizes

    Fuckin lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's a real LI post:

    https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7239360707425697792/

    But I just read it and all of the author's replies to comments and I am still only about 70% sure he's joking. He must be though, right? He's an undergrad at Georgia Tech.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago

    this bothers me in so many ways I wasn't ready for

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    You're missing out the best part. In the original post there's a PHD dude from MIT who just replies with "what"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If E=mc² and E=mc²+AI, it follows that AI=0. Which is an understatement because it doesn't just achieve nothing, it achieves regression.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    dude studying neuroscience, yet using less than 3% of the brain

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Undergraduate

    Neuroscience

    What gives them any credibility when it comes to computer science? The Dunning-Kruger is strong with this bubble.

    Edit: After scrolling through their comment responses and comments under other posts, I'm fairly certain they're just trolling.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    The stupid, it burns

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    The AI actually represents the extra energy use caused overcomplicating things by adding the coolest new thing without thinking about what it is and how it might help

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Should've got some sleep so you're thinking clearly, because that is some empty bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    I think we should turn this guy's mass into energy by pelting him towards the sun at the speed of light

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    This is copied from an older LinkedIn-comment, and as such I'm pretty convinced this one is satire.

    The original though, I'm not so sure.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    One could use Bayes' law, replacing B with I:

    P(A|I) = P(I|A)P(A)/P(I)
    
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Likedin is a stand up comedy platform.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Go Go Gadget Gouge My Eyes Out!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "symbolizes"

    You made a fucking logo and it sucks. Countless sleepless nights better spent at art school.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    The AI ideology has gone too far

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Some guy in the 80's was pushing the same thing but with "E=mc² + Texas Instruments Calculators". This is old news. /s

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Jesus Christ

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Sometimes I worry that one day someone will say the smartest thing I've ever heard in my life and I will laugh at them.

    Because I already don't understand dumb people

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I actually got pretty much exactly this text when playing around with ChatGPT asking it to come up with inspiring tech bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Would have been tastier with A1.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    College has become convincing dumb rich kids they are smart while convincing smart poor kids they are dumb.

    I know there are good professors, good people who work at universities, that isn't who I want to criticise, just to be clear. But once accounting for that, the rest is just a fucked to death flaming pile of shit

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Alright... Found the original post. I think this is satire and he got all his friends to say it's brilliant.

    Edit: looks like he stole it from someone. I think this is copypasta. Brilliant

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    mc² = E - AI

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I feel like this would be better placed in a “LinkedIn fuckwits” community. This is less lunacy and more tech trend bootlicking.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I read that title as, "Eat your heart out, Epstein."

    I couldn't understand how Epstein ended up on LinkedinLunatics, but I had to check it out.

    Speaking of LinkedinLunatics, did you folks hear that the Felon Drink Bleach is in the Epstein files?

  • source