Gay people have always been with us and will continue to be with us. Stay the hell out of peoples bedrooms you damn Nazis.
post
I don’t get it… if he doesn’t like gay sex why doesn’t he just stop having gay sex and call it a day
Think of it like Prohibition. It's not enough to give up on fun. You need to make sure nobody else is enjoying themselves without you.
if alcohol prohibition gave us bootleggers, gay prohibition would bring us bootyleggers?
So he's jealous of all the gay sex everyone else is getting?
Puritanism.—The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.
H.L. Mencken
Have you had gay sex! I mean you can't just stop unless its literally illegal. I feel for the man.
he enjoys it more if its forbidden, and not all the time.
Wake up folks and see how religion is a great way for those in power to control you. Stop giving money to religious groups and religion loses all of its power.
It does work : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiet_Revolution From quasi theocracy to atheist in just a few decades.
Religion is a tool used by Fascist. You don't defeat Fascism by pretending one of its tools is the true problem. Religion can just as easily be a tool of anti fascist resistance movements. Removing that tool from leftist movements has been a vital flaw of many revolutions.
I am not religious. But saying we should abolish religion will just have the "Ms. Rachel" types of Christians with actual real moral compass (her stance on Gaza obviously being one) caught in crossfire.
There is no working class movement without embracing religion as a tool to form solidarity. Religion is not just all fundamentalist idiots.
I don't see where they said to abolish religion. It was a call to people to stop giving money to religion. You can be religious without donating a single cent to religion.
There are a lot of religious groups helping to protect people from ICE right now. Blindly saying to stop giving money to religious groups across the board is either malicious or naive. I assumed naive.
Why do you think the feds gave the ability for ICE to enter religious buildings that use to be protected?
Religion is a tool. It's not good or bad in some fundamental way.
This is a common defense of religion, but it naively (or maliciously) ignores that secular groups help to protect people as well. Unlike religions, secular non profits are required to show how they spend their money, so the help is more direct and you can confirm if they are using the money you donate the way you want instead of some of it going to bigotry.
If it's a tool it's a bad one. You can't even check if it's working right. It's like a tool you can't check and just hopes it works the way you want it to.
It's not a defense of religion. I don't know why atheist Andy's have a hard time understanding that THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE RELIGIOUS.
So, instantly alienating religion and religious groups is just giving away a huge part of the population away to fascist propaganda. Religion can be used as a tool of anti fascist for leftist propaganda too though.
If you don't understand that then you clearly have never spoken with any leftist from the black communities of the South. Religion is a fundamental unifying part of any movement of solidarity there.
I literally am a black leftist in GA. I, nor the first person said to alienate nor abolish religion. Op said to stop giving religion money, and I pointed out giving money to religion is better spent giving money to organizations that directly help, and specifically help.
There are also organizations working towards making communities for black people who aren't religious, such https://blacknonbelievers.org/
I welcome religious people and churches helping out, and I'm not going to say anyone should reject such help. I am saying, that as a religious or non religious person, directly giving to organizations that help specifically would help much more than giving to a religion. It's similar to say the difference between getting ad revenue and Patreon or other direct donations. The latter is more effective.
Lastly, I will say there definitely is a critique of religion, in that many either way into a global fund/membership that donates to organizations that have contributed to where we are now, or directly do so themselves. Can I gaurantee every single one does? No, mainly because as I pointed out they have special rules where they can hide where their money goes. Some small unaffiliated churches may be completely clean.
However, those aren't even the ones you are talking about, since you specified the large populations of religious people in the south. Those standard denominations definitely gave to anti LGBT, anti abortion, and donated to have exceptions in law carved out for themselves, which significantly contributed to GOP effort to stiffle freedoms. That money helped Trump
embracing religion as a tool to form solidarity.
I'm sorry you need religion to form solidarity, but that's on you.
ah yes the party of small government
definitely not authoritarian
look, if I want to stick my dick in somebody's ass and they want me to stick my dick in their ass, what fucking business of the government is it
Government so small that only a handful of people make all the decisions without any oversight
if they make everyone they don't like a criminal, then they can legally enslave them. not that they care about what the law says anyway, but it will appear more legitimate
When I was reading The Handmaid's Tale couple of years ago it felt like borderline fantasy, worst possible scenario kind of thing. Now it feels like it's maybe 5 years away.
Or more accurately, they dumbed down the educational system so that nobody reads books any more, just whatever propaganda they feed us on our phones.
We've done it! At last, we've successfully created the torment nexus from the classic novel "Don't Create the Torment Nexus!"
Margaret Atwood specifically only included things that have already happened to women at some point in history so nobody could say it was far-fetched or out of the realm of possibility.
Does kissing Trumps ass count?
when hes drunk.
The student newspaper he ran in college suggested that you can’t rape someone who is unconscious.
He’s been married three times and is a serial adulterer.
I don’t think he’s a secretly gay or bi man. I think he’s the type that’s more worried that men will treat him the way that he thinks women deserve to be treated.
As long as you clasp your hands in prayer and ask Sky Daddy for forgiveness (which he will grant just because you believe in him) you can do anything. No contrition, no atonement, only profligacy and crimes against Humanity.
These people are fascists by definition. This is only feature 12 of 14, but they check every single box in the list.
"Let's police things we can't control whatsoever" - Idiot Republicans.
Not (just) "idiot", but evil. The "advantage," besides populist wank, is creating a new law that is enforced extremely selectively when you want to prosecute people for other, unconstitutional reasons. E.g. "We didn't infringe on their free speech, they were imprisoned for engaging in gay sex."
How about he release a video of Epstein instead.
First, ban gay sex. Tell people how gross it is and how gross gay people are. Then tell people that real men only have sex with women. Make the argument that young women are obviously better than old women. You know what's even better? Really young women. Sometimes they are called girls, or underaged or whatever, but man we have a crazy list where it says who raped had sex with the most really young women. And velieve it or not, it's the smartest, greatest american who ever lived, your president. Wanna be like him?
He’s secretly afraid dicks are delicious
Or maybe he already knows?
Tim Apple will suck his dick as well..
Tim Apple is the first of many CEOs who will suck dick to keep their profits going up.
Government so small it fits in all your crevices.
These are some of the worst people. It's a mistake to just let them walk around, take on positions of power, and sleep soundly at night. Someone who espouses such horrible beliefs should be banished from polite society, at the very least.
They're not even secret about it. They have websites. With their names, faces, and where they go to church on sunday.
Completely agree. These people wish harm on gay people, for the sole reason of them being gay? Something that literally doesn't hurt anyone. Then I wish harm on these people. I want them to feel pain, and I want them to suffer.
When my bf and I first got together, we went out for lunch with his high school best friend and his friend's son, who was a toddler. The friend started to talk shit about gay people, and I said, "Don't say things like that in front of your son. What if he turns out to be gay?" And he said, "If he's gay, I'll kill him and start over." I was like, wtf.
Just can't stop thinking about gay sex
No better way to stop gay sex than to talk about gay sex
Any one want to talk about gay sex?


top 86 comments