all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I stopped trusting them when they flooded the conversation with Nvidia price hike apologia since the Turing line’s (rtx 2000) release. They seem to have gone easy on the evangelization most recently, but they will still absolutely not do the bare minimum of calling out how insane it is for a company to engage straight-up false advertising in their official performance metrics.

I liked their “optimized settings” series, but that series ended (AFAIK)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Was this before or after they were bought? Cause I'll give em a 2nd chance if it was after.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    about 6 years before they were bought by ign

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Eh, enough if their content can exist fine without calling anyone out. I don't think it's what any of them really want to do, they prefer to focus on games. I feel like they mostly call out individual game performance.

    You are right in that their consistency in what they get upset about seems inconsistent. It does feel like it might depend on what company was nice to them recently. But I still think the heart of their content works even with that issue.

    Optimized settings was my favorite thing too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

    But do we reeeeeaally trust them? Don't get me wrong, I like them for their analysis games, but I just really don't like when they put up opinion pieces about games, like I still remember that comment about Stellar Blade being a gooner game. Maybe if they tried it, they'd have seen more than just the surface level stuff in the game. Not to mention the Cyberpunk review that they took down saying that the game ran fine at 1080p (unstable)30fps, as if the standard wasn't already 60fps at the time, not to mention that they tried to gaslight people into saying the game wasn't as buggy as people were claiming.

    I don't watch their videos because of stuff like that. But good for them going independant, that's always good when you can safely support yourself financially.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Honestly, I mostly trust them. I did feel they went too easy on some corpos, especially nvidia with series 50, but also amd and iirc they barely said anything about the Intel gen13/14 issues. Their attitude towards lower-end hardware is also a bit annoying, especially alex's. However they do have great retro reviews for both tech and games, and john's fascination with older tech is infectious. And I love that they have a positive attitude towards linux gaming and privacy in general, unlike many other channels. I wish them lots of luck with this newfound independence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago

    I did feel they went too easy on some corpos, especially nvidia with series 50, but also amd and iirc they barely said anything about the Intel gen13/14 issues.

    As someone who’s been following them for ages now, my understanding is that they say what needs to be said and move on when it comes to things that are beyond their control - personal opinions are for their weekly podcast. They could criticise pricing and customer hostile behaviour more but they seem to be very cautious about not contributing to unproductive negativity that’s so prevalent in video game commentary. Ultimately it’s up to consumers to vote with their wallets because talking about things doesn’t fix them. Blaming journalists for not speaking against things enough is not going to fix them either.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I must be living in some parallel dimension where unstable 30 FPS was the standard through nearly the entire previous console generation, even in non-open world games, which was still an upgrade from PS360 days. I wished I lived in your time continuum though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Isn't GTA6 targeting 30fps for the base PS5?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Current gen is a big improvement as to what’s expected and what’s delivered on 60FPS front. I really doubt 60FPS can be squeezed in GTA6 even from PS5 Pro given how it looks in trailers. I do hope that 40FPS performance modes become more common though, it’s way more achievable and still quite responsive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    With the amount of ray-traced reflections in the game, I doubt the ps5 with the previous gen amd gpu can even hit 40fps with a 1440 render resolution. It would probably have to drop to 1080 or less. It's definitely going to be game that will be best played on pc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    like I still remember that comment about Stellar Blade being a gooner game.

    No lies detected. Glad to see they’re still providing accurate analysis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I love those guys!

  • source
  • 15 comments in c/games@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I remember them coping how it‘s actually good that they‘re owned by IGN now not too long ago lol

    Of course this is good and I welcome it

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean, becoming owned by IGN was ultimately a good thing, as the previous owners were apparently preventing DF from going indepent before. At least that's how I understood it from their announcement video.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That's good, I should get better prices when smelting my scrap metal online now, I'm tired of paying for low quality copper

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Excellent news.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Good for them!

    I was just thinking recently about how amazing this channel is. They provide such a valuable service, and the space is so much better off with them as a part of it.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Fantastic! Always love their analysis

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm not into "game journalism" or whatever you'd call these guys. What sets them apart from any old random steam review?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They review graphical quality, not gameplay. They're very thorough and detailed, and generally very pleasant and positive and fair, and non-sensational and have no emotional manipulation engagement stuff

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments