top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 218 points 1 year ago (27 children)
  • [–] 72 points 1 year ago (25 children)

    My hope is that he signs the pardon before she testifies, and then she burns him down on the stand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    Why would he pardon her? Prison is sheer hell and she got a huge upgrade. Fuck around and they can take that back. They got all the leverage they need without the screams of outrage a pardon would bring.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    offtopic: Maybe that's why a transparent and safe prison system, a bit like what Norway has, would do well for USA. Don't tell me anything about feeding criminals in luxury, because you are spending far more taxpayer money on far more idiotic things. Also rehabilitation is really a big thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Child abusers don't deserve rehabilitation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    It's usually considered smart to avoid hard problems.

    Thus to say that every criminal deserves rehabilitation. You won't achieve anything good from taking it from them anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Well we shouldn't be letting them back out so rehabilitation is pointless and impossible anyway. If you can't understand that fucking kids is bad without being institutionalized you're a lost cause

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    There's plenty of context, the best is that nobody has the moral right to punish others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    No one has a moral right to fuck kids either and they have to be dealt with so they don't fuck more kids. There is no "context" that makes that excusable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    Just how they rehabilitate murderers, other sexual offenders, and who not. People change over time. The part that doesn't change (for pedophiles) is their attraction to children (unless, well, they intentionally do something like chemical castration or whatever), but that's not their crime, the act is their crime. If an examination by mental health specialists and who not deems they won't commit such crimes anymore, there's no reason at all to keep them locked up. Maybe with certain amount of tracking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I don't think we'll understand each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How much prison time have you served in state and federal prisons, if I may ask?

    Forgive me for asking, it's just to judge how much direct experience you have with what you're claiming to be knowledgeable on.

    There are sadly a lot of people in the Internet who would say such things without ever having actually experienced them firsthand, and it's important we educate ourselves on the difference. Thanks!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    I read those news in a way that she's now in a low risk facility with plenty of other people around who might casually remove a witness, rather than stuck in isolation in a max security prison where every 'suicide' would be met with public outrage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Release the Epstein files.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    he really is the dumbest motherfucker on the planet

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Conservatives are 100% onboard with a felon rapist pedo skyrocketing our cost of living while destroying our global reputation.

    If anyone is still unsure if conservatives are traitors to our nation, now is the time to pinch yourself and wake up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wouldn’t call them traitors but they do embody everything else that makes a person horrible! If you’re a republican I seriously hope you get bad allergi s diarrhea and stuck in traffic at the same time, no sun if your car windows get stuck up too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Traitors to the constitution, traitors to democracy, traitors to free and fair elections, traitors to the founding fathers, traitors to the people and even traitors to the union and the flag. What were you waiting for them to betray before you call them traitors?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 87 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Next 3.5 years if we are lucky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Luck is also a component in how long Trump lives ; though he's not that old.

    OK, I'll say it differently - luck is also a component in how long Putin lives, and that's likely less. When he dies, there's gonna be change. In USA too. In Russia - maybe not for the better immediately, but that will be a power transfer, which hasn't happened since 1999. Even if to someone of his daughters.

    I don't subscribe to any of stupid theories of "Kremlin towers' balance", "businessmen vs patriots" and such, but the point stands, and the previous power transfer, from Yeltsin to Putin, despite them being the same faction, changed a lot and fast.

    Which could mean some of the blackmail material leaking, or the direction of blackmail changing, or other ties being restructured. Which would pull the rug from many of Russia-aligned parties in the west, and it would be interesting to see whether Democrats or Republicans are affected more, in case of US, and whether local alt-right parties or the orderly centrists in EU are affected more. The common belief is that it's the latter in the US and the former in the EU, but I think we'll be surprised.

    Now, Russia is small compared to other parties, but big enough to make waves in case of such an event.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I agree, but I think we should amend this phrase.

    Release the UNREDACTED Epstein files

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago

    Where are the Trump-Epstein files?

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh boy, another distraction

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Fuck, I'm going to have to go back to doing math in my head again, aren't I?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I still have a Texas instrument scientific calculator. I have never found a calculator app that I like better.

    Put of course I was actually allowed to bring it into an exam which would definitely not possible with a phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    From the bleachers, we watch the Trump shitshow daily. The topic of the show is: "What can Donald Trump still do today to appear even dumber than the day before?"

    And he is not disappointing. What's next? Tariffs for interstate trading? One must admit, this would be a really dumb idea, but it is not outside Trumps grasp.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In lighter news he’s 78 with congestive heart failure, obvious mental decline, incontinence and obesity

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Looks like books are back on the menu, boys.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

    What do you mean "likely pushing up cost of electronics". That is the literal point of a tariff, to push the prices up and make competing goods more appealing to consumers. The only way it doesnt raise prices is if importers just eat the cost, which they will almost certainly not do and, frankly, shouldn't do.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    CPUs are so expensive, I guess I'll buy a good old US made abacus instead!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Damn, if only we had some bill that would increase manufacturing of chips domestically. It would be foolish to cancel such a bill while also creating a tariff. How will people favor domestic manufacturing without that manufacturing existing? Surely the president would never do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I’ll throw in the “well actually” here so no one gets wrapped around the axle — the true point of tariffs are to boost domestic business at the expense of weakening foreign sales. The scales tipped in favor of domestic businesses should be advantageous and arguably a good strategy in some circumstances …in a vacuum. That’s the “well actually” and it’s worth nothing in 2025 because all advantage is nullified if those domestic businesses lack the skill and resources to produce said goods. The industries currently targeted by tariffs are so huge and complex that domestic businesses stand zero chance (even with tariffs) in place to replicate the technology, supply chain, and workforce that would be able to stand competitively toe-to-toe with the global market.

    So it’s entirely a tax on Americans by another name, and for zero gain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In this case there are no competing domestic products though, or few enough as makes little difference. This is just taxation with extra steps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yes, I did mean in the ideal sense, there is a functional purpose for raising the prices of foreign goods IF there is a domestic alternative you wish to boost or expand. But the mechanism for the benefit, IF(big if) there is one, is the increase in price. Tariff (ideally) equals targetted price increases. Saying tariffs might raise prices is like saying stabbing you might wound you. I might have a good reason for wounding you, I might not, but the wounding will happen as a direct consequences of my stabbing you, regardless.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    The important won't eat the costs because there's literally no reason for them to do that.

    The tariffs don't actually upset shipping companies, they literally do not care. They continue to sell the product at exactly the same prices it always cost, once it arrives in a US port, that's the end of the transaction as far as they are concerned, since the tariffs apply after that, they are irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    get that AI bubble a-poppin

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This will surely bring manufacturing back to the US /s

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    America in a few years when no one wants their goods anymore and every country outside the US ramped up production since US is the most unreliable partner ever.

    shocked pikachu face

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Does the US actually have any domestic manufacturing of anything other than basic commodity products?

    There is that YouTuber who's trying to make a pan scrubber something in the US, and he's finding it really difficult to be able to find manufacturers for the various components.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'm going to tariff Trump a dollar every time his stupid face pops up in my feeds.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tariffs are paid by the importer so it will just make your feeds more expensive to import to your device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    It’s simultaneously a grift and a way to impose a flat sales tax all in one package.

    1. Republicans have been creaming their pants for years at the thought of imposing a regressive flat tax on all sales while doing away with income based taxation. This would forever shift the majority of the tax burden to the poor and middle class. Which is why we see Trump cutting taxes on the wealthy with his Big Ugly Bill and imposing a tariff as a way to tax the unwashed masses while simultaneously claiming he isn’t. Hopefully the courts strike down his power grab and force Congress to vote on Tariffs. The weasels will probably give it to them but at least we get to see Republicans go on record as voting for a tax increase.

    2. Trump has announced or will announce tariff exemptions that benefit large companies that have donated to him. Sometime later if he feels he needs more money he will announce a higher random tariff on the exempted goods and shake these corps down for more money/favors. All the while he can claim he is doing our industry a favor.

    Never forget Trump is a grifting piece of shit who will always stick it to the little guy.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    I like that! It always sucked that everything is more expensive here in EU, Trump's trying to help us by making it even more expensive in the US.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I watched part of this announcement and he said something I normally don't pick up on

    "If they have started to build or have plans to build they don't have to pay the tariff."

    Sounds like.jobs.

    But what I heard was it was a discount for the oligarchy. Why do you only get a discount if you are in the position to at least pretend to be building a factory?

    And then since prices are now double, you get to import and sell at an easy profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Even once it opens, it's cheaper to pay taxes on an empty factory than it is to pay tariffs or American workers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Plus of course the problem that chip manufacturing is not a US traditional industry, so there probably isn't that much skilled labor.

    Ironically they're probably going to end up having to hire foreign nationals.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, Apple's stock went up 5% yesterday because of Tim Cook's meeting with Trump (where he promised $600 billion investment in US manufacturing), and Apple's saying they won't be affected by the new 50% tariffs on India. There are also ghost factories that were built during Trump's first term.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    63 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    23 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    12 comments in c/hardware@lemmy.world view that post
    5 comments in c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca view that post