▲ 696 ▼ Trump says he plans to put a 100% tariff on computer chips, likely pushing up cost of electronics (apnews.com) submitted 1 year ago by Mereo@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world 216 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (13 children) Child abusers don't deserve rehabilitation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (12 children) It's usually considered smart to avoid hard problems. Thus to say that every criminal deserves rehabilitation. You won't achieve anything good from taking it from them anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (11 children) Well we shouldn't be letting them back out so rehabilitation is pointless and impossible anyway. If you can't understand that fucking kids is bad without being institutionalized you're a lost cause permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (10 children) There's plenty of context, the best is that nobody has the moral right to punish others. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) No one has a moral right to fuck kids either and they have to be dealt with so they don't fuck more kids. There is no "context" that makes that excusable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Just how they rehabilitate murderers, other sexual offenders, and who not. People change over time. The part that doesn't change (for pedophiles) is their attraction to children (unless, well, they intentionally do something like chemical castration or whatever), but that's not their crime, the act is their crime. If an examination by mental health specialists and who not deems they won't commit such crimes anymore, there's no reason at all to keep them locked up. Maybe with certain amount of tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (12 children) It's usually considered smart to avoid hard problems. Thus to say that every criminal deserves rehabilitation. You won't achieve anything good from taking it from them anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (11 children) Well we shouldn't be letting them back out so rehabilitation is pointless and impossible anyway. If you can't understand that fucking kids is bad without being institutionalized you're a lost cause permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (10 children) There's plenty of context, the best is that nobody has the moral right to punish others. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) No one has a moral right to fuck kids either and they have to be dealt with so they don't fuck more kids. There is no "context" that makes that excusable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Just how they rehabilitate murderers, other sexual offenders, and who not. People change over time. The part that doesn't change (for pedophiles) is their attraction to children (unless, well, they intentionally do something like chemical castration or whatever), but that's not their crime, the act is their crime. If an examination by mental health specialists and who not deems they won't commit such crimes anymore, there's no reason at all to keep them locked up. Maybe with certain amount of tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (11 children) Well we shouldn't be letting them back out so rehabilitation is pointless and impossible anyway. If you can't understand that fucking kids is bad without being institutionalized you're a lost cause permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (10 children) There's plenty of context, the best is that nobody has the moral right to punish others. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) No one has a moral right to fuck kids either and they have to be dealt with so they don't fuck more kids. There is no "context" that makes that excusable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Just how they rehabilitate murderers, other sexual offenders, and who not. People change over time. The part that doesn't change (for pedophiles) is their attraction to children (unless, well, they intentionally do something like chemical castration or whatever), but that's not their crime, the act is their crime. If an examination by mental health specialists and who not deems they won't commit such crimes anymore, there's no reason at all to keep them locked up. Maybe with certain amount of tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (10 children) There's plenty of context, the best is that nobody has the moral right to punish others. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) No one has a moral right to fuck kids either and they have to be dealt with so they don't fuck more kids. There is no "context" that makes that excusable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Just how they rehabilitate murderers, other sexual offenders, and who not. People change over time. The part that doesn't change (for pedophiles) is their attraction to children (unless, well, they intentionally do something like chemical castration or whatever), but that's not their crime, the act is their crime. If an examination by mental health specialists and who not deems they won't commit such crimes anymore, there's no reason at all to keep them locked up. Maybe with certain amount of tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) No one has a moral right to fuck kids either and they have to be dealt with so they don't fuck more kids. There is no "context" that makes that excusable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Just how they rehabilitate murderers, other sexual offenders, and who not. People change over time. The part that doesn't change (for pedophiles) is their attraction to children (unless, well, they intentionally do something like chemical castration or whatever), but that's not their crime, the act is their crime. If an examination by mental health specialists and who not deems they won't commit such crimes anymore, there's no reason at all to keep them locked up. Maybe with certain amount of tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Just how they rehabilitate murderers, other sexual offenders, and who not. People change over time. The part that doesn't change (for pedophiles) is their attraction to children (unless, well, they intentionally do something like chemical castration or whatever), but that's not their crime, the act is their crime. If an examination by mental health specialists and who not deems they won't commit such crimes anymore, there's no reason at all to keep them locked up. Maybe with certain amount of tracking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) Mental health specialists are wrong all the time. Prisoners lie to get out of prison. No amount of risk to children is acceptable, especially for someone who's already proven themselves a danger. There is no benefit to anyone besides the predator letting them back out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Rehabilitation doesn't have to go as far as letting them back out. There are different kinds of conditions, of ability to communicate with the outside world, to work etc. One might even make special isolated settlements where people live almost as if they were free, but can't escape. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Why bother with all that when it only benefits child molesters? They should be happy with the fact that our justice system is flawed enough that we can't just execute them like they deserve. There are valuable members of society those resources could be directed towards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) I don't think we'll understand each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Advocate for people who deserve it if your goal is to be understood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It's far more harmful to allow people, especially people like you, decide who deserves what. So no, all my points stand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) How exactly do you think these things are decided currently if not by people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago They don't have to be decided at all. That's why it's smart to avoid them. permalink fedilink source parent