top 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 147 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Absolutely unacceptable and ridiculous.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Keep them informed, of course they care about your opinion, especially seeing how anyplace else in the world where such things were introduced there were successful revolutions and people doing that ended up in jail. Oops.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 105 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Ugh, this shit again...

    Are there any initiatives out there to call a stop to this? Or even better, initiatives to introduce legislation that forbids setting up this kind of surveillance infrastructure altogether?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Patrick Breyer with the pirate party is my go to example of why small parties and extraparliamentary opposition is important. 99% of the people don't even know him and he's just doing such an sucessful job of protecting them anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    The annoying thing is that some states like Germany pretty much prohibit surveillance of this extend by constitution. It couldn‘t be made any harder for a legislation like this to pass and yet they keep trying.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Well we in the Swedish Pirate Party are strongly against this! We have been fighting since the beginning against Chat Control! Feel free to DM me and I can even try to find a Pirateparty near you or atleast a party who are aligned similarly!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 101 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Maybe it’s time to restart some some old Greek traditions and propose a law that anyone proposing chat control - from here on out - gets banished for life from entering European soil ever again.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They were smart, those oiled fish-eating goatfuckers. So maybe yes, that - and also sortition and ostracism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    oiled-fish

    Sun-rotten fish guts even, called Garum. Or nowadays Colatura di Alici, Pissata from Nizza, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Garum is Roman. Oiled goatfuckers were Greek.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 73 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It's not the EU yet. It's a group of activists from Denmark. There wasn't even preliminary voting on it yet.
    Doesn't mean we need to be complacent of course, but so far nothing happened.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)

    How the fuck can you be pro censorship/pro big brother? What kind of idiot do you have to be? Do they just get bags of money to spout out this bullshit?

    Does having a lot of money exempt you from this shit? I don't get it. I can understand detestable people being pro things that make the poor poor and the rich rich. But this affect everyone both poor and rich. The only one benefiting from this are fascist dictators.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's not "Danish activists" but rather the government. As a Dane I know how horny these people are to create a fullblown police/nanny state. SVM (the name for the government) is terrible for all of us. Can't wait to see their voter share drastically diminish at the next election, but clearly they can do a lot of harm first..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean, Danish government comprised of people. And some people there are activists about this particular bullshit, so they're pushing it at every opportunity.
    I should've been more specific that it's not just random group of people, but my point was that it's not the decision of the entire EU (or even the entire Danish government)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The SVM government as a whole is huge on expanding surveillance and the police force - I don't see that it's just a small group of activists within the parties. I'm just glad other EU countries aren't biting on this bs

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    but so far nothing happened

    Things happens frighteningly fast these days. It's not a matter of being complacent; it's a matter of budding things in the nip. Which won't work. Then tirelessly fight back against it.

    Unless you've been sleeping under a rock these last few… weeks. Not even months. Some legislation can go from 0 to 100 extremely quickly if left unchecked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Is the EU not subject to GDPR?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    Welcome to earth, Everybody Sucks Here.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

    So, need a non-homicidal, non-EU country to run an XMPP server then...

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    So Canada?

    (They do have a history of going a little overboard with the homicidal stuff. But they've come a long way in the last few decades.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'd almost say lol, get a VPS in China.

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend, and they have zero say over what I do, only what they do. China could demand and scream and bitch all they want over an encrypted set of programs and you'd never have to care, move to another domain and provider and copy-paste. Lock it down, only use it with encryption and let the wolves huff and puff until they're blue in the face.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's more about the latency since it's right over the border (<30ms). It's also a full 10Gbps so I can let family/friends use it and don't have to worry if a few of them are pulling the full 1Gbps from home connection. Doubt I'm gonna be able to match both of those with a Chinese VPS :/

    Honestly looking at Mexican datacenters right now. Some are basically the same distance, just in the opposite direction lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Mexico actually sounds kinda brilliant, but who seems important. OVH has servers in Mexico, but I can imagine some hosters would get the Feds on the line and go "sure, here's his data".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • That's true, ICE & Co. are also all over Mexico right now because of the cartels. The whole border lock down and immigrant round-up thing is only half of their current force. And one of the big things they've been doing down there is monitoring/tapping their communication networks.

    So yeah, never mind, probably not a good idea. If it was just for torrenting or something it's probably fine, but beyond that I wouldn't push it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Or matrix, which I prefer. XMPP has a myriad of issues, and matrix is more modern with a better ecosystem of clients and servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Too heavy and bloated, and too centralized in its design philosophy, not to mention big capital flowing through Matrix from Israel and the issues with metadata making it a privacy disaster.

    Here's a blog that agrees with me so I don't seem lazy: https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/matrix-vs-xmpp/

    I get your blogger's concern over OMEMO versions being out of whack and their encryption choices being all over the place, but other than it being somewhat of a mess, I don't see how it devalues the service as much as he thinks. (a bit melodramatic imo) I've yet to meet someome whos client can't decode my messages or mine theirs and I've never heard of any successful hack, but maybe maybe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Thank god my OS doesn't care about EU regulation

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Your OS doesn't, put the messaging apps that your friends/family/coworkers use do.

    And no, you can't convince them to switch messager, I tried.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Currently, I, my entire Family and everyone I know use Signal. And everyone that doesn't want to, can contact me via Matrix or XMPP, which literally no one ever does, even thought I know a lot of IT and CS people. I keep them as options regardless, just to offer them to people.

    I mean, there is also phone, SMS and email of course, but people seem to prefer a new messenger over actually contacting me in any of these ways. And then I'm always like "look, you can choose one of countless ways to contact me, if you like none of them, that's a you-problem".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And no, you can’t convince them to switch messager, I tried.

    Have you used the gambling addiction and honeypot comparisons?

    Or opium smoking in China one?

    If somebody makes a functioning NOSTR client similar to Telegram in experience - maybe that will be convenient enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    As long as owning a device that allow full E2E encryption without spyware isn't illegal.

    It bears repeating a lot of time : the technology to circumvent these things exist, and will continue to exist. However, there's nothing preventing obtuse lawmakers from making it illegal to own. And then, it's just a matter of catching someone and finding some rooted android phone in his pocket.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Wtf. Is Signal going to be affected? I just recently installed Signal on my phone.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Signal has already stated that they will pull out of the UK if they go through with their version of this, I imagine they'll say the same for the EU.

    Get a good VPN, exit it from a non-5 eyes country, and hope they don't start blocking by phone number alone.... and hopefully they'll drop the phone number requirement sooner than later.

    Also, welcome to Signal!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I think they already dropped the phone number req, not sure though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm starting to edit idcaboutprivacy more and more often (and that's not a good thing)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    time to make my own shitty ass software to deal with this stuff

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is not the Europe I remember...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    The fuck is happening over there? Was there lead in the water?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Authoritarianism, duh. It’s a global thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're answering the how, but I'm asking for the why. 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    More money. More power. More control over millions of people. Control over what you say? Not their problem; just control everything.

    The ability to deny other what they want is a drug to some people; make them feel superior.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Compelling search engines to deindex results, age verification, chat monitoring: stay golden, EU.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    If you're a citizen of an EU country, you should contact your politicians to tell them not to, maybe they won't.

    It only has to pass once, and they keep trying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Some keep trying. That's how democracy and politics works in general.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Many people in the US thought “He won’t”

    So, call your representatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    I agree that calling representatives can always be a good idea. But you cant compare the US and the EU.

    There is no "he", there is no president. No single person can run nor ruin it.

    It's simply not as fragile, but again, always let your voice be heard like you suggest. Just in case.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Buy EU, am I right?

    Geezus...

  • source
  • 34 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    1 comment in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post