One of the most-compelling arguments is simply how vocal Republicans have been in accusing opponents of election rigging. It's always projection.
post
Well that's a lot less of a hacky article than I was expecting - though they don't provide evidence that the claimed NSA audit actually exists, they do present a damn good case for investigating it further and a reasonably plausible vector by which the election results could have been tampered with. I doubt they were manipulated, truly the conservative bloc really is large and was far more motivated than the dems in the last election, but this is pretty solid reporting for a substack and I really hope something comes of it.
this is big news honestly.
Is it though?
They could all come out tomorrow openly bragging that they did infact steal it, and detail exactly what they did and how they did it. Nothing would happen, Trump would stay president.
however, there would be a reason to begin the next steps of ousting the existing administration.
think of it like a kingdom with a corrupt king. even though we all know he killed the last king, there are no known heirs to the throne. once a new heir is found and they are better than the existing king, it's far easier to push the people into rebellion.
Furhter articles from different sources with multiple sources claiming the same thing and more
Discrepancies all over the place
- There are definitely indications of fuckery in the election, the most compelling case I saw came from that one county in NY. According to some other people, it's a Hasidic community that just always votes however their rabbi tells them to vote, but that doesn't seem totally convincing to me.
- I don't think this story is evidence of that... it's honestly just a bunch of random innuendos about international human trafficking and other voting scandals that have already been exposed as voting scandals. Aside from one change to how config.ini was handled, there is literally nothing that I saw that is even a hint of an indication that something was stolen about the 2024 election. Why not focus on the stuff that proves the case (at least to lay out the broad outlines of the argument)? At least mention what it is? Why demand hand recounts, which are a lot slower and less reliable than other types of more properly done recounts? Why this aggressive flopping around among other issues and arguments? Am I missing something?
Anyone having a mirror for the free ebook?
Barnes and nobles wants my credit card even for a free book...
Just read an analysis of the "This Will Hold" article here: https://generik.substack.com/p/did-the-nsa-audit-the-2024-election
Sums up the situation well, I thought.
Thanks for sharing that!
In summary, the verifiable facts in the whistleblower article are scant. We can confirm that ES&S voting software was modified via ECO 1188 shortly before the election (more on that later), and we know that a significant portion of Democratic voters were indeed predisposed to suspect something was amiss in Trump’s victory – polls at the time showed roughly four-in-ten Harris voters doubting the result’s legitimacy, a mirror image of Republican sentiment after 2020. But the core assertion of an NSA-authorised audit flipping the outcome is, at least so far, unsupported by any evidence outside Zarnowski’s telling.
court case end of this month in rockland county ny
all 16 comments