178
Ex-CIA Whistleblower: "The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won" (thiswillhold.substack.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/usa@midwest.social
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 64 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

Well that's a lot less of a hacky article than I was expecting - though they don't provide evidence that the claimed NSA audit actually exists, they do present a damn good case for investigating it further and a reasonably plausible vector by which the election results could have been tampered with. I doubt they were manipulated, truly the conservative bloc really is large and was far more motivated than the dems in the last election, but this is pretty solid reporting for a substack and I really hope something comes of it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The sad thing is that it doesn't matter. Harris just noped out of there. And honestly how much choice did she have?

    Democrats spent years saying how secure the election was. It would have been absolutely terrible optics for the Democrats to come out and say, "The election was rigged." No matter how true it was.

    The issue we have today is that Republicans have succeeded. They sowed enough doubt that challenging them politically is near impossible. They control the courts, the legislature in enough states and federally, and now the executive. EVEN IF we get a fair election in 2028, you have a president who refuses to admit defeat and has the resources and, most importantly, the cult, that will defend him.

    We are in fascism times. And not enough people are doing anything about it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I was utterly blown away at how easily she just let it go. Pretty fucking insane.

    Like, the fact that the returns tilted SO AGGRESSIVELY after a certain point in time is deeply suspicious. I’ve seen the data deep-dives that people have done on several swing counties, and it’s statistically damning. The divergence from known, expected voting patterns is unambiguous.

    There are sharp, inorganic patterns in the data that cut in after a certain quantity of votes are tallied in the systems that point to algorithmic manipulation being activated - that is, there are organic/stochastically-reasonable voting patterns that are observable at first, and then it fairly sharply swaps to a clearly weighted and suspiciously consistent pattern.

    And that doesn’t even count the places where ballots “apparently” had tons of down-ballot democrats, but then Trump at the top of the ticket. That does not make sense.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent