Is there any proof of that? Otherwise those are just wasted words

Just read an analysis of the "This Will Hold" article here: https://generik.substack.com/p/did-the-nsa-audit-the-2024-election

Sums up the situation well, I thought.

What a crock of shit

Yeah and there were wmds in iraq

court case end of this month in rockland county ny

One of the most-compelling arguments is simply how vocal Republicans have been in accusing opponents of election rigging. It's always projection.

Well that's a lot less of a hacky article than I was expecting - though they don't provide evidence that the claimed NSA audit actually exists, they do present a damn good case for investigating it further and a reasonably plausible vector by which the election results could have been tampered with. I doubt they were manipulated, truly the conservative bloc really is large and was far more motivated than the dems in the last election, but this is pretty solid reporting for a substack and I really hope something comes of it.

I want to believe something will happen. But I'm not holding my breath

Go in front of a judge and say it.

There's no such thing as "Ex-"CIA

this is big news honestly.

Furhter articles from different sources with multiple sources claiming the same thing and more

Discrepancies all over the place

as projected. so they do

1. There are definitely indications of fuckery in the election, the most compelling case I saw came from that one county in NY. According to some other people, it's a Hasidic community that just always votes however their rabbi tells them to vote, but that doesn't seem totally convincing to me.
2. I don't think this story is evidence of that... it's honestly just a bunch of random innuendos about international human trafficking and other voting scandals that have already been exposed as voting scandals. Aside from one change to how config.ini was handled, there is literally nothing that I saw that is even a hint of an indication that something was stolen about the 2024 election. Why not focus on the stuff that proves the case (at least to lay out the broad outlines of the argument)? At least mention what it is? Why demand hand recounts, which are a lot slower and less reliable than other types of more properly done recounts? Why this aggressive flopping around among other issues and arguments? Am I missing something?

Anyone having a mirror for the free ebook?

Barnes and nobles wants my credit card even for a free book...