all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

Time to rename my home network to McDonald's Free Wi-Fi

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "The encouraging results achieved confirm the viability of Wi-Fi signals as a robust and privacy-preserving biometric modality, and position this study as a meaningful step forward in the development of signal-based Re-ID systems," the authors say.

    How is this even close to privacy preserving??

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I think they mean it's similar to a one-way hash in that you can verify that the interference 'fingerprint' of someone when you see that pattern again, but you can't identify a person from only the interference data, so for instance you could potentially have a database of targets to locate, and share only their wifi fingerprints with various other agencies to monitor for, without actually sharing their name, image, etc.

    Obviously surveillance as a general concept is inimical to privacy, irrespective of how it's done.

  • source
  • parent
  • 10 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The scientists claim this identifier, a pattern derived from Wi-Fi Channel State Information, can re-identify a person in other locations most of the time when a Wi-Fi signal can be measured. Observers could therefore track a person as they pass through signals sent by different Wi-Fi networks – even if they’re not carrying a phone.

    Are there any scientists out there working in stuff that's useful and beneficial to society? Or are they all just focusing on sneaky shit that makes it easier for The Man to make our life worse?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    In the US at least the cuts to beneficial scientific research have been devastating. New grads are already looking to work for evil corporations rather than take a chance in the hellscape of academic publically funded research.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Gonna have to start wearing metallic strips randomly to mess with my signal dispersion properties

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • I was wondering how many sensors it took to detect these signatures. The paper demonstrates its possible to detect with a single 3 antenna router.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    My comment from an earlier version of this post

    https://lemmy.zip/comment/20346816

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Let me guess, it was developed in Bark-ley ?

  • source