John Fetterman says...

Just leave man.

If he is against it, Van Hollen must be the right choice.

If Fetterman opposes it, that means it's the correct move. I guarantee if the Senate had ended 51/49 Democrats he would have officially switched his party affiliation, (further) betraying the people he's supposed to represent. Go choke on your AIPAC/UDP money...

It be hostile to also vote in a Democrat and get a GOP surprise.

Israel: Representation without taxation

Shut up, John.

This guy so very much hoped he'd be the center of attention if it was close to a tie in the Senate. Now no one can give a fuck what he thinks.

So it's the right call then. Fetterman can fuck right off with his irrelevant cowardly whore ass.

We all onow he is going to make the switch at some point, so might as well be in response to this from the jump.

As a Poor and DYING American there's NOTHING I care about More then sending ALL MY TAX DOLLARS to Israel so they can have socialized CAPITALIST Healthcare and Education! I don't care HOW many Children in My Community DIE as long as Israel gets My Money!

-Texans! Mississipians! Alabamans!

Federman is just 3 Kyrsten Sinemas in a trench coat.

Calling John Fetterman 'Senator' is already troubling enough...

Sounds like the guy we need then

Fetterman lost the right to his opinion.

If that isn't an endorsement of Van Hollen then I don't know what is.

At this point Fetterman is just fishing for an excuse to switch sides because he knows he has no leverage now. Just giving do it and stop being a disingenuous shit.

Why don't they just skip the party system and just represent their geographic area.

Politicians are elected to represent the people that voted for them ... not the party they are attached to

i'll pee my pants and fall into a hole if you do that, you're gonna feel really stupid