The answer of course is because these studios know that it sucks, they know people hate it for many and serious reasons and don't want to be called on it. They are collectively hoping that they can pass this stuff off and nobody will notice, that they can have their cake and eat it too, receive all of the plaudits and none of the blowback.

Those disclosures are there precisely so I can exercise my preferences as a consumer to not give my time and money to projects that are making wilful and repeated use of a technology that is already having serious environmental, creative, societal, economic and cognitive effects. Getting them shoved in my face regardless, and having to comb through so many store pages and even the first few hours of playtime just to find whether a studio has been truthful or not is exhausting, and is placing a burden on me that I do not want or should not have to bear.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 1 day ago (1 child)

"hypocrisy is the compliment vice pays virtue."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 17 hours ago

    Using AI art is one thing, but no one's going to be using 100% AI free code from any moderately sized software house.

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 22 points 1 day ago

    consent is bad for business.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 1 day ago

    Because extractive capitalism hates informed consent. When interacting with an extractive capitalist, keep one hand on your wallet and one hand covering your drink.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    It might be the pitchforks.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    If you don't like pitchforks, don't do things that invite pitchforks. It's really that simple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    ...well... let's not pretend that the internet mob is completely rational in all its brigading... the pitchforks come out and get pointed in various directions for no good reason quite often...

    I can't really blame anyone working in PR for feeling the need to tread carefully. That said, it's probably time we had some fair trade/labor practice disclosure standards for video games and/or computer software in general.

    That shouldn't be too extreme an idea to be practical - we have such things in other industries already, like clothing and food production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago

    Because these "game developers" are grifters: They're into it for the money. They see it as a passive income source they can have on top of their main full time job. And they all think that artists of all kinds drive at least a Porsche if not outright a Bugatti, because they saw some rich rapper like that.

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    It’s everywhere. Programmers who hate AI use Claude for their coding projects.

    People who hate data centers use Gemini to ask questions.

    There is a deep contradiction in people’s minds. At this point, we should focus on harm reduction: local first, ethical training.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment