all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 11 hours ago*

We should have voted for his political rival, Jack Jonathan!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 hours ago

    Its the impeachment of a war criminal. There is no excuse that would be acceptable. They bombed a school filled with children and you missed a vote for some political theater.

    Anybody covering for this deserves a swift kick in the ass.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 13 hours ago

    Bro I saw you in real life!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 hours ago

    The guy would even LOOK at him! This seemed like a "just following marching orders, take it up with someone else" kind of talk.

    The only reason I can think of that they tanked this was: 1. To have control over who is selected when they have full control and 2. They're financially compromised to make sure the war doesn't end.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago

    Playing in our faces!

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 13 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

    MISSISSIPPI went Blue? Quick! Do NOTHING Voters want!

    -LITERALLY Hakeem Jeffries!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    Blue MAGA cultists and bots are already out in full force defending Jeffries and Schumer. And MSM phrases everything around them being the only choice. Hopefully this at least wakes people up a bit to realize AOC isn't a progressive champion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    the brazilians seem to have created a viable defense to this type of manipulation in their last election and it'll be telling who engages in it in the future -- so far, it's only the spanish.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago

    Disgusted with my representative.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago

    Playing in our faces!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 12 hours ago (1 child)

    Trump has something on a lot of Congress members.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 6 comments in c/altmedia@altmedia.house view that post
    [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

    What a piece of shit. Sure hasn't taken long for Democrat voters to regret putting people like him into office.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

    You know the new Congress isn’t in office til next year, right?

    He’s a piece of shit but why would that reflect on voter decisions for next year? Who should they have voted for instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 hours ago (2 children)

    This is about a committee vote that just took place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    Right, but the comment I replied to said:

    Sure hasn't taken long for Democrat voters to regret putting people like him into office.

    It implies that this is somehow related to the recent 2026 midterm election.

    He’s been in office since 2023 so …

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 hours ago

    Hmm, my instance is notorious for federation issues, comments showing out of place, or simply not federating. They released a new version but there are still issues. I've taken screenshots of other conversations and haven't posted them yet so they can see. I'll try to get that done by Monday.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 4 points 12 hours ago

    Asshole. What did he think lying about it would do?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    They were all AIPAC funded assholes. The last thing Israel wants is for the US to stop bombing Iran.

  • source