What? A corporate owned for-profit company is willing to violate your privacy?!
This is front page news.
What? A corporate owned for-profit company is willing to violate your privacy?!
This is front page news.
You'll stop using corporate social media now, right?
I am laughing a little bit at you for using bluesky because surely everyone told you this would happen.
Man y'all real mad at bluesky when they're just implementing what the UK government requires them to. They could either restrict service fully, or offer it with the bullshit age verification. They made a reasonable choice in that position.
Be mad at the stupid age verification laws, but blaming Bluesky seems very silly.
Eh companies yell loudly about any minor inconvenience they have to some proposed law or change. Want to raise wages, security or improve working hours? The companies kick and scream about their profits, threaten with closures and more. But when it comes to age verification the majority is awfully quiet if not out right supportive.
No, I absolutely blame BlueSky, because they purport themselves to be different from Big Tech, and they absolutely aren't, and this is a great example. You can see fedi servers around the world omitting age verification because they're either not in the UK or don't make any money.
Or they could refuse to comply with unjust laws, you're allowed to be mad at people for failing to do that when they have a good opportunity.
What is the punishment for not complying? I know what this law requires, but I don't know how the UK goes about actually enforcing this kind of regulation.
Here's an example of another US based company refusing to comply with UK internet law and how that's going:
Lawyer Myles Jackman, who specialises in sexual liberties and obscenity law, said the case lays bare one of the practical weaknesses of the OSA - that the UK regulator has “no right imposing fines on US domiciled companies that they have no right to collect”.
“The UK government has no jurisdiction over the American Constitution,” he said, adding that Ofcom could decide to issue enforcement proceedings in the US as they have threatened but that they would “seem destined to fail”.
He believes in order to retain “credibility” Ofcom will be left no choice but to block 4chan on UK internet service providers (ISPs), making the site inaccessible to users in the country. But he points out this will be easy to work around for those with VPNs.
This is mainly on the brits, not specifically on Bluesky. They are racing to make the british public the most surveilled, personally identified and fully activity-logged population in the world.
Sure, you could just not implement this, but if you want to earn money in a country, then you will have to conform to the laws there, just as you have to adhere to the GDPR in the EU.
I just use witchsky, plenty of the alternative web clients by pass the age verification.
I liked Aussiezone's solution. I just put "this is me on lemmy" in my 13 year old reddit acct profile. maths math out.
vpn's are such a pain in he ass because the free ones are usually too slow or accidentally leak my location -- which is in the united states, but my jmp routes my traffic through the UK so i get his with this.
i just don't bother with bluesky.
Free VPN use is like worse than not using one tbh. Like if its free its definitely monitoring you. And who knows what else its doing. It's about as safe as going to the dark alley downtown and accepting some "Free samples" from the guy selling weed out of his jacket.
it still might make sense just so law enforcement has to go to another country for your data instead of the local ISP.
i'm aware and i use it for porn and centralized social media only -- they can have it
It is most certainly worth it to pay for a VPN. That's the only adequate solution.
I think the world would be a better place if world governments threatened their lives whenever they suggested doing these things.
I'll keep saying it: democracy doesn't rest on elections and whatnot, it rests on fear of government officials to lose their place - or, on extreme end, their head - should they go against people's will.
If this fear isn't there, everything else will be warped to suit their needs.
People still use NaziSky?
crazy that if you go to any of their posts, ALL replies critiquing ICE are hidden by default. this is just twitter all over again
not just. when activists were exposing icepick, faces, locations, cars, etc., NaziSky deleted & banned all the posts.
why Nazis continue using it is beyond me.
and don't forget about shadow banning the palestinians
I was there for the indigenous excom🤝🤝
never heard of this one
It happened around the time Canada was illegally destroying Andean land, Brazil was genociding indigenous folk, etc.. Our agitprop was so strong, that instead of addressing to imperialism of Canada, NaziSky banned us all.
when was this? u got anything fore to read on those? particularly on brazil since its my country and i had zero clue about that
I'm trying to google the andean land thing but nothings coming up. Can you point me in the right direction?
Edit: NVM you mean like the actual Andes with mining companies. Gotcha gotcha.
all 14 comments