Same as it ever was. The uppers fuck up and labour has to do ethics and security training.
post
Why is my company's cybersecurity training limited to simulated phishing emails and online courses?
Maybe next year's cybersecurity budget should include some for hot-looking models (of every gender).
Some things never change

Gotta deploy the "ugly" test in all such matters:
Would this situation be sus if the other party was unattractive to me?
You would not believe how many things this filters out. Sales, advertising, cons, youtube videos, instragram, tiktok nonsense, the list goes on.
someone that looks like that, I'm taking them to pound town.
he's so old and frail, it doesn't even look like he could fight back.
To be fair, I'd fall for this too. Zero chance I'm turning her down
There's hooking up and then there's hooking up with someone you're in business with and helping her do illegal shit at the risk of your job.
While being very old and married? Okay i guess
"I'll suck your dick if you click this link." Has a different ring to it.
Backdoor penetration test
CEOs are the most targeted, and the least likely to doubt their own decisions.
Fortunately, I am far too ugly and too poor to be a security risk.
EDIT: I am secure on my ugliness and poverty.
You can be ugly and poor and a security risk. If you are insecure enough and lonely enough to fall for the honey pot then out goes the security.
If you are secure enough in your ugliness and too busy eeking out an existence then a honey pot won't work because you know their interest is your body of work not your actual body.
Yeah, most of the NVIDIA employees are millionaires. I'm sure they'll be ok.
*Source, I do know a NVIDIA employee and he's well off now.
At least two amazon workers are millionaires too, i assume they all are
If you look up median, or average, net worth of Nvidia employees you will find that according to internal survey, at least 76% of employees are worth over 1 million dollars, with 50% being worth more than 25 million.
they own like 3 GPU or something?
Shit, I mean they only have like 3 departments that actually need staff with their manufacturing pretty much entirely automated. Purchasing, sales, and r&d. Purchasing is likely a stressful job there and probably paid worse than the others. Sales is dwindling as they move more of their sales to long term b2b contracts. They probably have less people on that team than they used to, and those people are likely in charge of very large accounts. Then they have a very large very well paid r&d department.
All of this makes me wonder how many employees they even have. It can't be that many when compared to more traditional manufacturing industries.
Workforce Breakdown
• Research & Development (R&D): Roughly 31,000 employees (about 74% of the workforce) work in R&D and engineering.
• Operations & Support: About 11,000 employees handle sales, marketing, operations, and administrative roles.
• Geography: Approximately 55% of Nvidia's workforce is based in North America, with the remainder distributed across regions like South Asia and East Asia.
this data is from revelio labs, and seems to be acked up by Macrotrends and Yahoo Finance
It's mostly because of stock awards as part of compensation packages.
If you get $50,000 in equity each year and the shares are worth $20 when you were awarded them, then they balloon to $160, you just earned $400,000 for each year you held on to them. These numbers are all made up and just for reference, but this is what some of these hardware company employees experienced.


all 57 comments