So Unfair (media.piefed.world)
submitted 8 hours ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
So Unfair

all 57 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 137 points 6 hours ago (11 children)

Same as it ever was. The uppers fuck up and labour has to do ethics and security training.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 child)

    We have like 8-factor authentication. VPN, Yubikeys, auth apps, Face ID. I swear upper management does not have to do all this bullshit.

    I also recently had to take a mandatory training on insider threats. Apparently being good at your job and also complaining about your job are two signs of an insider threat. Both of those apply to me, so I’m wondering if I should report myself as a possible insider threat. It doesn’t seem as fun as fucking a Chinese spy though.

    Edit: also being bad at your job makes you an insider threat. So I guess you just have to be entirely mediocre, not too good, not too bad. Do just enough to get by, but don’t do too much. Or too little. Any outlier is an insider threat. Conform. Don’t be different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

    Some companies are just as ethically bankrupt all the way down to the mailroom.

    Once, I worked at a place that had, and I kid you not: "Ethics awareness training."

    Said presentation had a few slides dedicated to mandatory legal matters and that was it. Ethics? Training? Awareness? Nevermind all that, did you know that we've always had Eurasia as a loyal customer? I didn't stick around for very long.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 4 hours ago

    The training is not for you. The training is to protect the company.

    If anything ever happens that results in some kind of legal action, the company can say they gave the employee the training and the employee successfully completed the training, therefore we did all we could to prevent this and we are not liable. So then it all falls on you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 hours ago

    I took a very similar presentation from the shadiest company I was ever employed by, specifically that "gifts and other favors" are generally guidelines to be followed by local customs. I.e. bribe away as long as you aren't in the United States. Weird as fuck for a company that solely does commerce in the United States to have murky guidance on this very clear issue.

    My role here was very brief, they hired me for a licensed role and then paid me as a customer service rep, so I quit immediately after my first paycheck was about $3,000 short.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    In fairness, "training" is usually a 20 minute PowerPoint presentation of Goofus and Galiant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 hour ago* (1 child)

    I worked for a tech giant that is a homonym of Sysco. The mandatory security training videos were I shit you not animated cartoon animals. I would be deeply concerned about security flaws in their products, except that I never encountered anyone there that had anything whatsoever to do with their actual products, nor did I encounter anyone who themselves had ever encountered anyone that had anything whatsoever to do with their actual products. This abstraction from the product line was actually a common topic of conversation there among the employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 68 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

    Why is my company's cybersecurity training limited to simulated phishing emails and online courses?

    Maybe next year's cybersecurity budget should include some for hot-looking models (of every gender).

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    Penetration testing just got another meaning

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 7 hours ago (16 children)
  • [–] 24 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Gotta deploy the "ugly" test in all such matters:

    Would this situation be sus if the other party was unattractive to me?

    You would not believe how many things this filters out. Sales, advertising, cons, youtube videos, instragram, tiktok nonsense, the list goes on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

    To be fair, I'd fall for this too. Zero chance I'm turning her down

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    There's hooking up and then there's hooking up with someone you're in business with and helping her do illegal shit at the risk of your job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    While being very old and married? Okay i guess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    "I'll suck your dick if you click this link." Has a different ring to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 4 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 6 hours ago

    CEOs are the most targeted, and the least likely to doubt their own decisions.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 hour ago

    Management never goes to training

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 child)

    Fortunately, I am far too ugly and too poor to be a security risk.

    EDIT: I am secure on my ugliness and poverty.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 hours ago

    You can be ugly and poor and a security risk. If you are insecure enough and lonely enough to fall for the honey pot then out goes the security.

    If you are secure enough in your ugliness and too busy eeking out an existence then a honey pot won't work because you know their interest is your body of work not your actual body.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 hours ago (10 children)

    Yeah, most of the NVIDIA employees are millionaires. I'm sure they'll be ok.

    *Source, I do know a NVIDIA employee and he's well off now.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 hours ago (9 children)

    At least two amazon workers are millionaires too, i assume they all are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 hours ago (8 children)

    If you look up median, or average, net worth of Nvidia employees you will find that according to internal survey, at least 76% of employees are worth over 1 million dollars, with 50% being worth more than 25 million.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    they own like 3 GPU or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 hours ago* (3 children)

    Shit, I mean they only have like 3 departments that actually need staff with their manufacturing pretty much entirely automated. Purchasing, sales, and r&d. Purchasing is likely a stressful job there and probably paid worse than the others. Sales is dwindling as they move more of their sales to long term b2b contracts. They probably have less people on that team than they used to, and those people are likely in charge of very large accounts. Then they have a very large very well paid r&d department.

    All of this makes me wonder how many employees they even have. It can't be that many when compared to more traditional manufacturing industries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 hours ago*

    Workforce Breakdown

    • Research & Development (R&D): Roughly 31,000 employees (about 74% of the workforce) work in R&D and engineering.

    • Operations & Support: About 11,000 employees handle sales, marketing, operations, and administrative roles.

    • Geography: Approximately 55% of Nvidia's workforce is based in North America, with the remainder distributed across regions like South Asia and East Asia.

    this data is from revelio labs, and seems to be acked up by Macrotrends and Yahoo Finance

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 child)

    It's mostly because of stock awards as part of compensation packages.

    If you get $50,000 in equity each year and the shares are worth $20 when you were awarded them, then they balloon to $160, you just earned $400,000 for each year you held on to them. These numbers are all made up and just for reference, but this is what some of these hardware company employees experienced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago*

    I was gonna say, isnt high employee stock compensatition common for pump and dump companies?

    The pump would be useless if youre theyre the only one holding onto stock, and actual money keeps its value after the pop so you can't give that to employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 44 minutes ago

    This isca sacrifice executives are always willing to make.

  • source