all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 22 hours ago

Probably. Establishment dems like Schumer and Jeffries don’t work for us, they work for their investors.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    The fight never stops. I don't mean that in an apathetic or pessimistic way.

    I mean, we need to keep fighting and never stop fighting.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 7 points 21 hours ago
    [–] 7 points 16 hours ago

    Count the ones who get campaign contributions from those industries, and you'll have your answer. How is this even a question at this point? We all know what the fuck is going on.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 22 hours ago (10 children)

    Leave it to corpo media to pretend we all thought the midterms were a magic button that would fix everything overnight.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

    Hey, we do have more progressives in office than ever before, in spite of the money fighting it. THAT is the win.

    The rest will likely be disappointing. The question is, are we going to sit around wishing for some white knight establishment dem to ride to the rescue or are we going to push back, more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

    The question is, are we going to sit around wishing for some white knight establishment dem to ride to the rescue or are we going to push back, more.

    Yep. They're (intentionally) mistaking celebrating our small victory for a conclusion of hostilities. We know it's not over and it's not gonna BE over until the people are once more in control of their own government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

    Which is why I think they’ll give us Schumer (again, its that defined 7 on a pair of 6 sided dice).

    I encourage you and anyone else working class to read up on revolutions. The fellow who did the series Andor has. Tony Gillroy. Match it with historians. People who run governments do study it. They vent the people. Sometimes talking sideways is enough. Sometimes you have to throw a bone to release some of the pressure built up behind the hunger. Good odds Schumer will be the bone.

    The difference is we do have a few more players. Not just Sanders and AOC. Even so, odds there are not in our favor.

    I think after venting us they’re going to point to 2025 and use that fear come 2028 vs doing things to improve our lives.

    One small example. Remember, NIOSH was gutted. These are our filters for all of construction and trades and all of healthcare, including prehospital, including firemen.

    Every person in those professions is in danger because their safety gear regulators have been gutted. Even some random school teacher who likes to woodwork. Filters against that fine dust inhalation? Well. Maybe they’ll be ok? Whose to say? Lead remediation on your old house? Asbestos? Maybe. Sure. They surely wouldn’t roll back quality just because it’s not being regulated. Would they? /s

    Bits like that crap deal could all be packed into a bill. A big beautiful bill, one that should already be written and ready to go. But is it?

    They’ll vent us, they’ll have to. Just enough to prevent rioting. And then I think they’ll try to ease back into the usual. Just don’t be fooled by the venting. See it for what it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    I hadn’t heard the concept venting before and it’s a useful one for sure.

    The only way to drive real change is to get mad and stay mad until the change you want to see is there. Knowing you’re being vented and expecting it is crucial in this, thanks for pointing this out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 13 hours ago

    The diivided, scattered info sources that place all of us on a slightly different page when it comes to information also helps prevent focused anger. There may be individual focus, but crowd focus is gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 19 hours ago

    Bits like that crap deal could all be packed into a bill. A big beautiful bill, one that should already be written and ready to go. But is it?

    When could they find the time over the last two years of doing nothing? Also, who would write it? They're law makers. Law writing is something done by corporations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    President Roosevelt recognized that the long-range interests of his coalition and the Democratic Party were best served by encouraging radical groups, whether inside or outside the party, to feel as though they were part of his political entourage.

    This is why I laugh at calls for unity over progress. The thing we're being asked to have unity with wants us to stop fighting and let the status quo win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

    Centrists need depopulation in Congress. We will not recover for generations already with what has been undone. We don’t need more of the same ole obstacles.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

    Centrists need depopulation.*

    If you're dumb or evil enough to be a neoliberal in this day and age, after witnessing essentially everything getting worse across the west and the wider world due to neoliberal policies, it might not be possible to reeducate you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    You have too much faith in how smart Americans are. Most just want the optics of dems being in power even if they're nothing but republicans running as dems because they don't like Trump but like every other part of the GOP platform

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago

    As someone who's lived in multiple midwest/flyover states, not really. The median American is a leftist. They want healthcare for all (genuinely ask any Oklahoman how jealous they are of Native Americans in the state). They want strong labor protections. They want cheaper rent and most want public housing back. Most all of them recognize that the wealthy (though many do limit it to 'some' of the wealthy) are responsible for how poorly their life has gone, and the main struggles they've found in life. They want to help their neighbors and in many small towns you'll find just straight up a Sharing Economy, which is a genuine possible path for post-socialist economics at the local level; and they recognize that the state should only exist for conflict disputes. Hell, until 2001 you could not find a single 'rural' or what would now be 'MAGA' voter that supported the existence of police or their ability to just stop people. Until 2009 it was hard to find any that actually supported immigration restrictions or 'anti-dei' or 'integration.' Like genuinely they were incredibly rare.

    So there is hope. But because democrats chose neoliberalism and chose to make the singular difference between the parties 'who can tie populist ideas to their platform first,' many Americans went full conservative/MAGA, despite not knowing what those positions actually entail, and most Americans just because disillusioned with american democracy and chose to exclude themselves since both parties were genuinely the same exact platform in 1992-2000.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 23 hours ago

    Yes, because hope is naive, and humanity is disappointment crystallized.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 13 hours ago

    They are financed by the same types, duh.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 22 hours ago (5 children)

    Yes, because we have 2 political parties and they both suck (one more than the other). Neither represent the people (as is their job). They represent the billionars. The ship is going down and there are no life boats for us. Enjoy what is left.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

    So what you are suggesting to combat the problem is "nothing". Thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

    I wish I had an idea of how to combat this. If I did, I wouldn't hold it back. I can only hope someone smarter than I am can come up with something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago*

    American democracy relies on an engaged, educated populace, and the less personal, individual engagement there is the more fragile it becomes. The Founders knew this; we are now all very painfully having to relearn it.

    The bare minimum that ANYONE can do, no matter their circumstances, is to self-inform and to engage with the business of democracy. Instead, you've given up and you're here to gloom on others that are engaged, so that they self-select out as well.

    Again, here's what you actually wrote, which I will also note has sfa to do with the article or the thread and merely reacts to the headline:

    Yes, because we have 2 political parties and they both suck (one more than the other). Neither represent the people (as is their job). They represent the billionars. The ship is going down and there are no life boats for us. Enjoy what is left.

    Try engaging and self-educating. Stop wallowing in defeatist bullshit and mentally engage with what is before you. You didn't even read the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    I think if they had real intent, the DNC side of it, not the progressive side of it (who we know already are with We The People), there would have been a short version of P25. They’ve had 2 years to draft something and that’s way more time than anyone needs. Where’s the Build Back Better 2027 (or whatever politics happy phrasing you prefer)?

    It’s missing. Which spells out what they intend. The standard platter of nada.

    Here’s hoping our progressives are scrappy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 6 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 10 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Not if Schumer has his say in it. He will make sure it never happens until he says it can.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago
    [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    Schumer wouldnt betray dem voters, right.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago*

    The Democrat Party is currently still led by a type of conservative called "neoliberals". These are conservatives who pretend to hold some progressive views, but who only serve billionaire backers.

    Schumer, Jeffries and every other conservative cockroach needs to be aggressively ejected from the party. Their AIPAC and Palantir receipts should be dealt with as bribes and they should be imprisoned.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    But the problem, according to critics, is that it’s a horrible and counterproductive bill that will empower utility conglomerates, mining companies, data center operators, and oil and gas behemoths to extract huge concessions on the future buildout of polluting projects while hiding behind the promise of a more efficient permitting process for clean energy infrastructure—a noble goal.

    The crux, as summarized by The Verge, is that while the legislation, if passed, “could be a catalyst for lots of clean energy, it could also speed up polluting projects and limit oversight of new data centers.”

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/pravda_news@news.abolish.capital view that post
    [–] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    People JUST voted Overwhelmingly AGAINST the Republican agenda, EVEN so far as flipping BLOOD RED STATES Blue! Which means it's the PERFECT time to Help Republicans do EXACTLY what they Want!

    -LITERALLY Democrats!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago
    3 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 22 points 1 day ago

    Yes! Voters CLEARLY want us to Cooperate FULLY with Trump!

    -LITERALLY Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago*

    Absolutely, they have to try to crush the soul of the progressive momentum through openly cynical backstabbing, that is literally the job the rich pay them for.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago

    Yeah, probably.

  • source