I’m pretty sure Leia never glassed planets or used specieist biowarfare.
post
uggghhhh, tell me you have no media literacy without telling me you have no media literacy.
For the last time, Grievous was a fascist trying to dismantle a neoliberal democracy that was already decaying from the inside. Leia was a liberal trying to work inside the fascist regime to reinstall a neoliberal democracy.
Neoliberal isn't a useful term here, but if you were going to use it you should call Grievous a technofeudalist.
Grevious yes, but there is a point to be made that some rebels against the republic were fighting against an overstepping republic for independence without grasping their movement was being co-opted by the Sith.
The intended parallel was the decay of democracy by the united effort of corporate interests. The Banking Clan, the Techno Union, the Commerce Guild, the Trade Federation, they all controlled a tremendous economic chunk of the Republic. The entire Separatist movement was orchestrated by the Sith, from the death of Master Syfo-Dias to the Hyperspace War that started the trade route taxes.
The entire thing was built by the Sith from day one to turn the Republic into the Empire.
Really it came down to their hobbies. Her hair was great and his collection was built on murder.
General Grievous is more like one of those pre-1948 Zionist terrorist leaders fighting the U.S.
On the outside it looks like he's overthrowing the corrupt institution, but really he's working for its secret government so that he can contribute to its total compromise and make it even more corrupt
If Grievous really functioned as a meaningful freedom fighter who sought to dismantle the oppression of governments, then he'd never target the vulnerable at the advantage of the Sith
all 23 comments