all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 4 days ago (8 children)

I don't think I understand this one. I do know what a speculum is, but other than "extremely not fun", I can't see the context.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    Washington just passed a law that for girls to play sports, someone has to look at their genitalia first and verify they’re female.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    You say someone as though it's not gonna be a sex offender, registered or yet to be caught, fisting minors for their pleasure, in the locker room. And you also know they'll just site this law whenever they receive any backlash.

    I would love to know whoever voter for this so I could bash their skulls in for essentially voting to legalize pedophilia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    I’m sure it’s coincidental that the perv looks like Rafael Cruz.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Not sure if it is an anti-trans or anti-women in sports, initiative. Many men are opposed to the gains that women have made in the sports world. If this drives women out of sports, they'd be very happy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago*

    It's both, they want trans people to not exist and women to be domestic childbearing slaves.

    About a week after its allies won a Supreme Court ruling allowing states to ban transgender girls from girls’ school athletics, a leading conservative group that has campaigned for seven years to “protect women’s sports” is singing a very different tune. On July 8, the Heritage Foundation—the right-wing think tank widely known for sponsoring Project 2025—published a report calling for the rollback of the very landmark federal protections for women’s sports that have driven their explosion in popularity over the last five decades.

    The paper, by Heritage senior research fellow and Boise State University professor Scott Yenor, argued for “restoring a flexible approach to athletics” by exempting sports from Title IX, the 1972 federal law that bans sex discrimination in education, or else loosening the law’s requirements. The paper is laced with stereotypes about women’s “natural preferences”—describing women as having “gentle, graceful, cooperative tendencies” and being “oriented toward motherhood and traditional feminine graces.”

    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/07/heritage-foundation-womens-sports-title-ix-trans-athletes-discrimination-protections/

  • source
  • parent