all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 2 days ago

Amazing! Actual good news! I’d thought it was a thing of the past. Very pleasant surprise.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    Just like Google deforested illegally to install an AI DC, if you won't physically deter this, your laws won't do crap. We’ve seen this play during the coal wars. “Illegalization” means a business expense to corporations.

  • source
  • 18 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 63 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

    I've lost count of how many times Florida has put high speed rail on a ballot and got votes overwhelmingly to find a way to make it happen. And it still doesn't have it. If Florida had done what the population wanted back in the 90s, it would already be paid off and it would be an entirely different, more modernized and connected state. But "it was too costly".

    I know a ban is a bit different, but it's an example of how just because the will of the people is expressed, it's no guarantee.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    Man Florida is a long state and mostly flat. Not sure if the wetlands screw things up but I imagine it is a nearly ideal state for rail.

    Too bad it is full of Florida men.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 days ago

    The shock is realizing that Florida Man is just because of open criminal records, not because of region. There's "Florida men" everywhere, just in different flavors. Be careful out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I mean, it does absolutely pour rain every day for about 5 minutes (in my experience), but if that is an issue I imagine the trains could just, stop for that 5 minutes. Because it literally just comes and instantly goes, but also it's an extremely heavy deluge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Miami to Jacksonville in half the time as driving sounds great, but then you're in Jacksonville without a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    Jacksonville wasn't part of the first one, it was Tampa - Orlando - Miami. Not sure about the others. Valid point, even with a train we're so car dependent other things would also have to be in place for a lot of people to use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Building it helps stimulate demand for more non-car centric infrastructure. My city built a light rail years ago, and despite stopping at pretty much a single line, tons of development popped up at most of the stops and a lot of housing along the line. None of that would have happened in a car-free way without the rail coming first.

    The US desperately needs a highspeed rail network to rival the interstate highway network. But of course, that can't happen, America is too big for railroads, apparently.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    That always made me mad, I voted for it every time, it would pass, and then nothing would come of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    It was going to happen, using private funds to build and operate it for 10 years, before giving it over to the state, but Rick Scott killed it as soon as he took office as Governor, without ever mentioning it during his campaign.

    Later, he backed a new conventional rail system, in which he has an ownership stake.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    Take that! And that! And this!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago

    We better start seeing those RAM prices drop else just gotta start boycotting them into submission.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago
    [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    I love this so much!

  • source