all 55 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 83 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Great! Let's teach kids that "searching the internet" does not have to mean "Google it"

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    I've read that young folks have dropped the term and now say "search it". I'll have to ask my young ones. Unfortunately, they often answer in ways they think daddy wants to hear, despite my admonitions to stop that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    No they fucking say "chatgpt it" 💀

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    This will backfire hard. It will create students who do not conflate Google with search.

    Never interrupt your enemy when he is in the middle of making a big mistake.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago

    They seem to be going all-in on bad ideas lately, losing all that ad revenue from ai giving the answers before they can bombard the inquirer with ad slop and now this. Let them die a fiery death, lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Good, keep shooting your self.
    Schools all across the world are rejecting AI, this will open the road for alternative search engines.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 days ago

    Don't be Evil...be nice to those quarterly reports.

  • source
  • [–] 82 points 3 days ago (15 children)

    DuckDuckGo

    You are foolish for not using that by now.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    Maybe "naïve" or "ill informed". "Foolish" is pretty harsh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    The assumption of tech savvy around here is wild! Never been in another online space where people assume everyone is at a reasonable tech level.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    You've never been on the internet before lemmy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    :) Since the 90s! But nowhere, and I do mean nowhere, is as snotty and assumptive about the man-on-the-street's tech savvy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Yeah I'd agree its probably over assumed here more than other places, but it's definitely not uncommon in other online spaces... I find it hard to believe it's something you've never seen before unless the only other space you've been is Instagram or tumblr and only following food posts or similar...

    FTFY:

    The assumption of tech savvy around here is wild! Never been in another online space where [all the] people [there] assume everyone is at a reasonable tech level.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (1 child)

    You get me. I meant it's worse here than other places. Same for assuming political savvy. Believe it or not, there are shitloads of Americans who don't know about 1/1000th of Trump' crimes. "Oh I don't listen, politics is all bullshit."

    Commented on Trump's dementia to a friend the other day, "Yeah, but wasn't Biden pretty bad too?" That's where the "man on the street" is at. :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    DuckDuckGo and Startpage are the way

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    Search should be a public utility at this point.

    But then again I don't know how you'd neutrally maintain a search algorithm.

    Regardless, depending on a private company for something so fundamental to societal functions seems bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    You want the government running search?! That's an absolute horror show; you see the impossibility of neutrality.

    Here in Florida, "homosexual teen" would lead to sites about conversion camps. We might just score a Democrat in the governor's mansion today, so that would change. And then change again. Imagine the non-stop public fight over what is and is not appropriate to show in a search. AH! (I'm actually having a giggle thinking about such fighting. "Trannie" would lead to results about transmissions one year, a transexual slur the next, banned altogether the next.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    At least there would be a non-stop public fight over it, instead of just having to swallow whatever the corpos which captured the government want to put in their search result.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    I imagine there'd be even more bribery if search was run by a government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    If search was provided by a government run by a functioning country with strong democratic roots - AKA the west excluding the US - political parties messing with search would cause them to lose voters. Bribery only increases that effect in an actually working structure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago

    Google and Republicans want stupid easy-to-control kids who grow up into stupid easy-to-control adults that can't think for themselves.

  • source
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    They really think they still have that much leverage, do they?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago

    “Be Evil”

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago

    You promise?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    google: ai summaries are hurting our advertisement revenue

    also google: we'll block you if you reject our ai

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    As someone else pointed out, the IT admin will just change the search engine behind the omnibar. Speaking as a sysadmin, I wouldn't put up with a broken search bar, I'd simply fix it. Hell, even consumers have the power to change it in Chrome!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago

    I'm gonna forward this article to DuckDuckGo and Kagi. I imagine they could help the school district do what Google can't.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    Really sucks that there are no other search engines to use.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    shut off their refrigerators.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    Make it so anyone can turn it off 🙏

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    YaCy for the brave and independent

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    To me the title reads as, "Allow us to abuse you or we wont let you be abused by us".

    In other words the best solution is to reject both anyway, Fuck ai.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    Okay. Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Google.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 3 days ago
    [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    sounds like a great opportunity to drop google from education infrastructure and rely on a more balanced approach of books, papers, and physically handing shit in.

    dunno. worked for me when I was in school.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    Probably Gemini told them that would be an awesome Idea.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago*

    use duckduckgo then. google search is mostly AI generated anyways now.

  • source