all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52 points 5 days ago

govern

Oh, is that what they've been doing?

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 4 days ago*

    Let me guess: ignore Congress, let billionaires do whatever the fuck they want, rule by executive order, and hope that the other two branches of government don't grow a spine and do something about it. So, basically the same thing they've been doing all along?

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 5 days ago

    Isn't that what they've been doing for the past two years?

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Senior officials, including deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and budget director Russell Vought, have been working with the ‌White House Counsel's Office since April to identify executive actions on immigration, tariffs, housing costs and federal spending that Trump could pursue without congressional approval, said the three people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 4 days ago

    How about we map a path to govern without a president instead?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

    If Republicans lose control of Congress, Trump said he expects he ​could issue vetoes for "a month or two" before reaching compromises with Democrats.

    "I guess I'll become Mr. Veto," Trump told the New York Post's Pod Force One podcast in an interview excerpt ⁠released on Sunday. "And then at some point, we'll probably make deals."

    Maybe it's time to cut back on the powers of the executive, both the veto power against the legislative and the pardon power against the judicial branch can't be justified in my opinion.

    Same issue for the governors and state parliaments by the way.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Veto power is important, I'd hate to lose it even if it sucks. Pardons need some hard anti corruption protections and protection against pardoning of allies. At the same time though there have been a lot of pardons I really support from the nonviolent cannabis users to Chelsea Manning

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago

    I'm ok with pardons to some extent. I just have an issue with judicial acceptance of preemptive pardons which are immunities that can only be granted by legislation and that's ignoring actual immunities that also aren't particularly supported constitutionally.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    THAT'S A DICTATORSHIP

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    What do you mean "mapping a path". They're bypassing congress already. No mapping anything, just doing it.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

    Here’s their plan. Declare the midterms stolen before polls close, Ground invasion of Iran, possible nuclear strike, attempt to declare martial law, Trump announces 3rd term run, bully Supreme Court into letting Donny run a 3rd time, Donny dies of a stroke in April 2027, JD Vance all the way baby!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 5 days ago (6 children)

    One could almost be mistaken and read this as: Democrats have had options every time they were in office, but instead cried and sucked their thumbs, soiling their diapers and claiming "we'd love to help you but the Republicans won't let us! We'd need the super duper ultra mega majority with cream filling in order to accomplish anything!"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th Avenue and there would be people blaming the Democrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    This article is largely without substance. I don't see how it manages to even be "news". I genuinely had to double check if it was labelled "opinion". I expect better from Reuters. Nothing worth discussing here.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    A) why would they start governing after the Dems neuter them? All they've done so far is loot and pillage... B) They're not just losing congress. Good chance the house will flip, too.

  • source