Over on threads someone just use ai;dr and we all need to admot that right quick

all 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 1 week ago

Wake me up when AI ends by green day.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 week ago (6 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Problem is by starting the video AND commenting you up the engagement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Wait, I love a good written guide but for years everyone was doing YouTube videos instead.. Now I have to use AI to make me a written guide from a video I dont want to sit in front off ? Oh god I'm screwed either way

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago

    Ai;dr something something you’re right and brilliant for asking.

  • source
  • [–] 66 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I hate that this could kinda have two meanings:

    • This is AI slop so I’m not reading it
    • This is too long I ain’t reading allat, give me the AI summary
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Arguably, if someone wants an AI summary, the can easily get one, from their device. If someone wants a text to be non-slop though...

    Yeah, I don't worry about the ai;dr expression that much myself, I think it will sort itself out with use.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    si;dr final offer

    /s if it wasn’t clear

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    Been using this one for quite a while now. Sometimes you need to share AI conversations for context. My rule of thumb is that I human summarize and contextualize like I would normally, then in a thread below it, fork off an ai;dr quoted reply. Makes it like optional reading.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    Careful now, we'll start running around dropping this like "fake news" (when it's factual).

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Ok, I don't get it. What is ai;dr supposed to stand for?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Is it when you give an incorrect but confident summary of an article?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Okay, but some people think the use of capitalization and punctuation is proof positive the writing is AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    In the same vein, I have invented a new word: Copegoat

    In use: "When Trump dies, Vance will be the copegoat for all the things MAGA couldn't blame on him."

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago*

    Babe, wake up, new subliminal advertising tactic for Threads just dropped.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    What is sarcastic about "ai;dr"? Is the implication that people who say this actually did read it?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    I've seen this a year ago it isn't new

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Dang, these initialism are getting more complicated. It would be nice to have some variation on the word "summary".

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Has been used for months. Not new.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    ts;wr

    Too slop; won't read

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    And here I thought we had peaked with slop, bravo internet

  • source