all 55 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 97 points 1 week ago (9 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    They destroy everything good. Sims studio. Bioware, who in all fairness bought in back before EA was so blatantly terrible.

    Not sure who is churning out the latest Sims crap given the lack of studio for it. 3 was thoughtful and had fun CAD software. 4 is crap, with no CAD.

    Maybe there will be a new AI produced ME installment. I’m sure it’ll be top notch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

    Sims 3 was for people who make train dioramas. Sims 4 was for people who play with doll houses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child)

    There was no town building in 3, but there was an integrated CAD software, full tweeks in colors and decor. In essence, I think it probably was like constructing dollhouses. The new one seems more like a phone app game. Not sure what the appeal is, but I’m glad it was only $5.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    There was town building you had to use their sims world builder tool which was almost exclusively how i played.

    After I was done I would go in the world and watch all my little ants go to their jobs and what not.

    Sims 4 on the other hand was just a doll house sim.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Seems like every company that is listed as a stock is just a pump and dump for CEO billionaires nowadays

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    The exact opposite happened to EA. It was publicly traded before, then bought by Trump's son-in-law and Saudi Arabia, but also they took a massive loan to buy it and most of that loan was added to EA's debt, not in any of their own names. So now EA is in a metric fucktonne of debt (went from 2 billion to 20 billion with this deal).

    I suspect they'll just let it go bankrupt once they've managed to loot the IP (FIFA in particular) and transfer it to some other company. Then JP Morgan Chase is left holding the bag and Jamie Dimon will have to decide if he wants to sue Saudi Arabia or not.

    Leveraged buyouts are the devil. If going public basically guarantees enshittification, a leveraged buyout pretty much guarantees bankruptcy with or without enshittification and cuts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 1 week ago

    It's like that "how many times do we have to teach you this lesson" meme. It's capitalism. Capitalism always does this. The people calling the shots and keeping the profits aren't the people doing the work.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago

    So... like before but with AI thrown in there? Ok.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    Has morale at EA ever been good?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    I feel like if it ever was, it was back when their logo looked like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

    Personally feel their "Challenge Everything" phase was bangin'. I hope the employees were doing well though. The games sure felt like they were made by people who cared.

    Right off the bat I'm thinking of Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and 007: Nightfire. Oh, and the Battlefield games were fun then, too!

    (Uggghh I miss 2142...)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    A steady decline into complete enshittification over four decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I don't know about that, certainly at the beginning there was no shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    That's exactly what "A steady decline into complete enshittification over four decades." means.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    People saying "nothing new", but they did used to have Diversity and Inclusion as a cultural pillar (albeit mostly performative in practice, like the rainbow logo appearing for pride month in every region except the Middle East). I expect that's all been burned down now.

    Bad things can always get worse...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Yes, that's capitalism in a nutshell. For anyone who doesn't understand what we mean when we say "late-stage." This is the endgame. It always has been.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago*

    i worked at EA Several years ago. I can only imagine how bad it is now. At the time I worked there though, I could not believe the bullshit I was dealing with at that studio. I've never seen anything like it anywhere else in the game industry. The most hostile work environment I've ever witnessed. When I was there they were literally making shit up about their employees to get out of paying them their bonuses.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    i thought i'd be better after selling to the saudis... /s

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    Is this article new or a decade old?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    When was this not the case? In the 80's?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It was just 'here is what these 14 UXR [User Experience Research] studies are saying, so we've got to do it this way."

    I've never worked in games, but in consumer tech apps, any UXR study that's not done in active collaboration with the team is (almost but not entirely) useless. And that's assuming they're done in good faith - actual learning goals, non leading questions, full coverage of user segments. It's just so easy to use "14 UXR studies" to justify whatever you want to do by stripping out context or cherry picking studies.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    I believe it. I spent 12 years at a company where the governing philosophy was "just get it done", and the only upside was finding ways to do the jobs of three people helped me get the job I have now at a much, much better place.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Okay, so I know that a lot of venture capital or whatever likes to buy a company then just turn it into a husk of its former self, but how the hell do these companies profit from this shit?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I'm 100% convinced it's the sports. Anything sports related (the big ones) becomes a racket, completely dominated by wealth extraction, perpetuated by the general populations insatiable desire for sportsball...

    For them they get FIFA 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005... Etc etc repeat for every other major sport. The difference between them? The rosters.... Easy money and people buy them every year over and over every year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    So easy to just crank out microtransactions and DLC for, too. I feel like they're gonna jump on connecting the sports game franchises with all the rampant online sports gambling any minute now, despite all that progress we've made against gambling addiction mechanics in the past.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago*

    The actual companies don't profit, the investors and executives take all of the money and the company collapses and gets sold as just a brand name that owns some other recognizable brand names that have also been destroyed

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    I have to check in on my friend that works there. It worries me when I don't hear from him for a couple days. Hope that explains the situation.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    What kind of psychopath would stay there. Run for your lives!

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Psychopaths that want to feed their families? It's not like there's a bunch of employment opportunities for game devs right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Okay, stay until they kill you for being bisexual/gay!?

    I am fucking serious, sure keep your job until you can make an exit plan but get the hell out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Easier said than done. I work for a similar company and I have a good exit plan, but that's only because I'm very privileged. I don't have kids, unlike many of my coworkers, and I can't even imagine trying to balance a stressful dayjob with job hunting on the side and caring for children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Hey, I totally appreciate what your saying. All these people who have given their life to this company deserve better. And yes, I am sure some of them have kids, wives, hell disabled nephews that depend on them.

    I get that. They need to get the fuck out. Go to another company, make a career change, or stay for awhile to figure out how to leave. Something other than living with a company that is going to destroy them as human beings.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    At EA. Surely not‽

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Bring in the liquidators!

  • source