all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 142 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

"...I remember, like, them sending over a close-up of cellulite and being like, ‘Do you want us to touch this up?’ And I was like, ‘No. That’s an ass.’”

Gotta appreciate the honesty.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 74 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    if you want Botox for your face to be on film why not Botox your ass too?

  • source
  • [+] -170 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)
  • [–] 92 points 1 week ago

    Which traumatized her, btw. As it did the majority of women that had their private pictures stolen and distributed.

    Now, I'm not hatin on you, we all gotta learn some things as we go. But, as others have already informed you, having one's nude images available in one context doesn't preclude objecting to ones nude images being used in another. More important, it absolutely isn't the same as being naked with people around you, and you could be a porn star that consented to distribution of your performance and be perfectly valid in objecting to someone on set that isn't necessary.

    There's a fundamental difference between images and ones body. There's a fundamental difference between having a minimum number of non-intimate coworkers present during a nude scene and having random other crew present.

    We are all allowed body autonomy. It is the fundamental right, the right that underpins almost all other rights. That autonomy includes having a choice in who does and doesn't have access to seeing your body. That period right before this sentence is period, there's no exceptions, only violation of ones right to preserve access to their body.

    To use a hyperbolic comparison, what you said translates to "why? She was raped once, so she should be okay being groped now." No, it isn't the same thing 1:1, but it is very much a useful analogy. She essentially got violated years ago, and being violated isn't going to make anyone less likely to object to further violation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 93 points 2 weeks ago

    So, because her privacy has already been violated, now whomever wants to is entitled to see her naked?

    Is this the insane point you're trying to make, or am I missing something? I've been raped previously, so I want to protect myself if that means I'm now fair game for any random passersby.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Go back to Reddit, man, they like this type o shit over there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Exactly. Reddit started hating her after she was pissed about the leaks. She was their darling before then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments