▲ 170 ▼ Jennifer Lawrence Filmed a Nude Scene and Discovered Crew Members Who Were Not Approved to Be on Set: ‘I Came Down Hard on That’ Discussion (variety.com) submitted 2 weeks ago by TheImpressiveX@piefed.social to c/movies@piefed.social 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca -170 points 2 weeks ago (11 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] tacotroubles@lemmy.world 127 points 2 weeks ago The hell kind of question even is that? She has had pictures stolen from her so she cant want to retain some control over showing her body further? Like what are even trying to say? permalink fedilink source parent [–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 92 points 1 week ago Which traumatized her, btw. As it did the majority of women that had their private pictures stolen and distributed. Now, I'm not hatin on you, we all gotta learn some things as we go. But, as others have already informed you, having one's nude images available in one context doesn't preclude objecting to ones nude images being used in another. More important, it absolutely isn't the same as being naked with people around you, and you could be a porn star that consented to distribution of your performance and be perfectly valid in objecting to someone on set that isn't necessary. There's a fundamental difference between images and ones body. There's a fundamental difference between having a minimum number of non-intimate coworkers present during a nude scene and having random other crew present. We are all allowed body autonomy. It is the fundamental right, the right that underpins almost all other rights. That autonomy includes having a choice in who does and doesn't have access to seeing your body. That period right before this sentence is period, there's no exceptions, only violation of ones right to preserve access to their body. To use a hyperbolic comparison, what you said translates to "why? She was raped once, so she should be okay being groped now." No, it isn't the same thing 1:1, but it is very much a useful analogy. She essentially got violated years ago, and being violated isn't going to make anyone less likely to object to further violation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 2 weeks ago I’ll tell you a secret: she’s allowed to bar anyone she wants from seeing her body for any reason she wants. Even if they’ve seen pictures of it before. permalink fedilink source parent [–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 week ago If you're genuinely confused, the difference is consent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 93 points 2 weeks ago So, because her privacy has already been violated, now whomever wants to is entitled to see her naked? Is this the insane point you're trying to make, or am I missing something? I've been raped previously, so I want to protect myself if that means I'm now fair game for any random passersby. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 2 weeks ago Wtaf? Reevaluate your life. permalink fedilink source parent [–] QueenFern@lemmy.zip 52 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) Go back to Reddit, man, they like this type o shit over there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (2 children) Exactly. Reddit started hating her after she was pissed about the leaks. She was their darling before then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 child) I don’t even think that had anything to do with it. They finally got to see her naked and didn’t need to see her as a person any more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago They never did in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ech@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago Do better. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tacotroubles@lemmy.world 127 points 2 weeks ago The hell kind of question even is that? She has had pictures stolen from her so she cant want to retain some control over showing her body further? Like what are even trying to say? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 92 points 1 week ago Which traumatized her, btw. As it did the majority of women that had their private pictures stolen and distributed. Now, I'm not hatin on you, we all gotta learn some things as we go. But, as others have already informed you, having one's nude images available in one context doesn't preclude objecting to ones nude images being used in another. More important, it absolutely isn't the same as being naked with people around you, and you could be a porn star that consented to distribution of your performance and be perfectly valid in objecting to someone on set that isn't necessary. There's a fundamental difference between images and ones body. There's a fundamental difference between having a minimum number of non-intimate coworkers present during a nude scene and having random other crew present. We are all allowed body autonomy. It is the fundamental right, the right that underpins almost all other rights. That autonomy includes having a choice in who does and doesn't have access to seeing your body. That period right before this sentence is period, there's no exceptions, only violation of ones right to preserve access to their body. To use a hyperbolic comparison, what you said translates to "why? She was raped once, so she should be okay being groped now." No, it isn't the same thing 1:1, but it is very much a useful analogy. She essentially got violated years ago, and being violated isn't going to make anyone less likely to object to further violation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 2 weeks ago I’ll tell you a secret: she’s allowed to bar anyone she wants from seeing her body for any reason she wants. Even if they’ve seen pictures of it before. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 week ago If you're genuinely confused, the difference is consent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 93 points 2 weeks ago So, because her privacy has already been violated, now whomever wants to is entitled to see her naked? Is this the insane point you're trying to make, or am I missing something? I've been raped previously, so I want to protect myself if that means I'm now fair game for any random passersby. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 2 weeks ago Wtaf? Reevaluate your life. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QueenFern@lemmy.zip 52 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) Go back to Reddit, man, they like this type o shit over there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (2 children) Exactly. Reddit started hating her after she was pissed about the leaks. She was their darling before then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 child) I don’t even think that had anything to do with it. They finally got to see her naked and didn’t need to see her as a person any more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago They never did in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (2 children) Exactly. Reddit started hating her after she was pissed about the leaks. She was their darling before then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 child) I don’t even think that had anything to do with it. They finally got to see her naked and didn’t need to see her as a person any more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago They never did in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 child) I don’t even think that had anything to do with it. They finally got to see her naked and didn’t need to see her as a person any more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago They never did in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago They never did in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent