• EU-Australia FTA will remove 5.5% critical minerals tariff
  • Agreement expected to be signed early next year
  • Australia, EIB 'very close' to MOU for funding arm
  • Looking initially at rare earths, gallium, antimony

...

The European โ€‹Union expects a wave of investment into the Australian critical minerals sector as it โ€Œpushes to diversify its supply chain away from China, the bloc's ambassador to Australia Lawrence Meredith said on Tuesday.

Australia and the European Union struck a free trade agreement in March after eight years of negotiations, removing tariffs on almost all goods โ€‹and easing EU access to Australian critical minerals.

...

"It is going to be a game changer," Meredith said.

In parallel, talks are "very close" for Australia to โ€‹sign a memorandum of understanding with the European Investment Bank, which would act as the bloc's funding โ€‹vehicle, Meredith added.

"The European Union will be massively investing in critical minerals. Since we wish to diversify away from China, then one of the most likely partners has to be Australia," he said.

EU policy proposals have laid out as much โ€‹as โ‚ฌ10 billion ($11.2 billion) for critical raw materials within the larger โ‚ฌ409 billion competitiveness fund, as the EU debates its โ€‹budget from 2028 to 2034. Australia is one of several critical minerals "superpowers" in which the EU is looking to invest, โ€Œincluding Brazil, โ South Africa and Canada. The EU also expects to invest along the supply chain, including in processing, Meredith said.

...

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

The EU also expects to invest along the supply chain, including in processing

Isn't basically all processing of rare earth metals done in China today? What is EU's plan to do the processing in Australia, EU or other friendly countries?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 3 points 1 week ago

    Nice, go Australia! ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ

  • source
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    Not if one nation gains power. One of them even told me to read a book in wokism... Which was written by a MAGA senator (I suspect they knew that immediately, but figured I'd be too dumb to know who they were)

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Theyโ€™re not getting in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Yeah. Highly doubtful

    In Vic , they won 2% in one house, 0.2% in the other

    They were beaten even by the legalize marijuana party.

    The only thing that's changed is that they're saying they're going to win now

    They're the new palmer United party

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Iโ€™m assuming you mean their last election, because this one is on the 28th November

    I wouldnโ€™t use it as a benchmark, a significant amount has changed since then.

    Personally, unless something quite dramatic happens think itโ€™s now a question between the two conservative groups who governs, because Labor arenโ€™t winning it, unless they get through in the backs of the Greens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Remember Palmer United Party? Nobody does lol

    If you check the ONP Facebook pages, there is DEFINITELY a lot of bot activity. . Gina also bought some media networks since then (and, shortly before, thats when you could tell the advertising suddenly changed)

    I wouldn't count on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    What are you talking about? Which nation? Gaining power where, over who? Why did a nation tell you to read a book?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Theyre the Australian equivalent of maga....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Man... I'm not a grammar nazi but goddamn I sometimes wish people would have proper grammar. If the other guy had said "Not if One Nation gains power..." I'd have right away realised they are talking about a group or a party and not thought that they are talking about this random nation that will gain world dominance.

    Though I suspect me being a non-native English speaker might have affected things a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/world view that post
    [โ€“] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Australiaโ€™s existence as a colonial export nation continues.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    We're gonna tax the mining companies this time, right?

    Right???

  • source