no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
15 comments in c/science@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 66 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The fact that the colour is so sensitive to the position in the furnace suggests that it would have been very difficult for the Romans to control the colour.

It would have required skill to refine the process but himans are great at finding ways to repeat extremely complicated and precise techniques to get consistent results. Sure, it probably took decades to get consistent but after that I'll bet they could crank out consistently and with intentional variations.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Sure, it probably took decades to get consistent

    Then again, let's remember this is a society before tv, the internet, or readily available books...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    They probably had a lot more time on their hands, with a culture where sitting to watch tv was an unavailable form of avoidance entertain.

    I can’t imagine this would be too difficult to figure out. Heat with a consistent supply of fuel should burn at about the same temperature, right? So, if you can create separate chambers where heat must travel through a medium like stone before it can heat the next chamber, you can somewhat control the heat… meaning you’ll have chambers of different temperatures, each decreasing as the chamber gets further from the fire source.

    There’s probably ways to test the temperature without a thermometer, too. For example, how long does it take a small cup of water to start boiling? If you touch a weed to the side of the chamber, does it instantly light aflame or simply char? Etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    it's magic

    Said no scientist ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    It's a question of sentiment. Especially in science it is important to find amazement by the wonders you spot in the world. To paraphrase from Pratchett's 'The Wee Free Men':

    It doesn't stop being magic, just because you figure out how it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 weeks ago

    As a scientist, that’s one of my favorite quotes ever. There are so many things that I understand at a deep level and still find that their working is magic. How all the pieces combine just so to make the process smooth and effective… (my personal favorite is the Fourier Transform, the theory behind it took centuries to fully develop, but its usefulness was clear from the get go, then Fast Fourier Transform came and made in the cornerstone of signal processing)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Always upvote Terry Pratchett, especially The Wee Free Men, the best bedtime story ever. (And it doesn't matter that I mangled the accent, pronouncing Crivens! with a long I. I got the energy right. Besides, Feegles run on Narrativium, free of Roundworld constraints.)

    The article refers to the gold and silver particles acting like a rainbow. Rainbows are simple science and yet they're also magical, every time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    I feel this sentiment does harm for the perception of science. The idea that scientists have to be mundane, no fun hardasses who don't appreciate wonder really doesn't sell STEM fields to people and paints science and scientists as no fun Nancies.

  • source
  • parent