all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 104 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The suit, filed in filed in federal court in Miami, accuses the paper and its reporters of having “knowingly and recklessly” published “numerous false, defamatory, and disparaging statements,” which, it alleges, caused “overwhelming financial and reputational harm” to the president.

His reputation before: A pedophile, rapist, felon, fascist, serial bankrupter, fraudster, racist who wants to fuck his own daughter while stealing from children's cancer charities.

His reputation after: A pedophile, rapist, felon, fascist, serial bankrupter, fraudster, racist who wants to fuck his own daughter while stealing from children's cancer charities.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    These are the same, case dismissed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

    As it turns out, the article is a gift from Murdoch: https://www.axios.com/2025/07/18/trump-epstein-letter-maga-documents

    Just outrageous and questionable enough for MAGA to use as cover, and Trump to turn into a lighting rod. But it doesn't change much for anyone else. Before, MAGA Media had nothing to point to and paint Trump as the victim. Now, they do.

    It derailed the schism :/

    Other media's lapping it up to tell readers want they want to hear: MAGA is infighting, when in reality they are not.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hopefully this doesn't just get dismissed and we get some nice information in discovery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Based on the last few cases, The WSJ will cave and settle with Trump for a ridiculous amount of money in order to stay on his "good" side.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Or Murdock did this on purpose to give trump a safe case to set precedence on- Murdock will have his lawyers flub key parts, like arguing discovery poorly so that trump can claim the epstein files are privileged govt material,, etc, so that when he brings suits against more hostile media co's, the judges will have precedence to point to when denying better formulated arguments.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Other media’s lapping it up to tell readers want they want to hear: MAGA is infighting, when in reality they are not.

    can you show me some examples of this not being the case? i am wondering where to look for an actual analysis on how MAGA is handling this letter, because i have seen several real world responses from his supporters that are extremely upset and feel betrayed. you're saying this isn't a sizeable group within his base? interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    The above article quotes and sources major influencers, but if that's not enough, go to the source:

    https://xcancel.com/RealAlexJones

    https://rumble.com/search/video?q=Epstein&date=today&section=date

    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-ben-shapiro-show/id1047335260

    https://tuckercarlson.com/

    seen several real world responses from his supporters that are extremely upset and feel betrayed

    Not sure what you've seen. But to be blunt, a few clipped Twitter screenshots or clickbait headlines filtering to Lemmy's front page don't paint a good picture. This place is a bubble... Like most of the internet. Twitter is, too, as its algo just shows you want you want to see, not a fair "slice" of activity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    ..no, i said real world examples lol. like a town hall meeting where people loudly booed Trump and it was a meeting specifically for his crowd.

    edit: this here - i can't find a good clip that is just the event itself, sorry. searching nowadays is garbage but it is out there. this will give you an idea of what i'm talking about. there are more examples.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Influencers are a good bellwater, they're the heart of the MAGA movement. They go where their viewers want, which is (for now) attacking the WSJ and defending Trump.

    /r/conservative is still total Trump too: https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/

    I don't know of any grassroots uprisings against Trump. Surveys will take weeks to percolate out, but the lack of documented rebellion kinda suggests voters aren't turning on him in person, either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    check the edit in my comment. i don't know about a documented uprising or anything but people are vocally expressing disapproval and some are rather upset. trump almost got assassinated by a disillusioned conservative. these people are dangerous and unhinged even against themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That was a week ago, heh. Now the narrative is flipped.

    Look through recent comments here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1m0qcp0/congress_has_voted_to_deny_the_amendment_to_the/

    There are quite a few dissenters, but also tons of:

    • Hating on anyone but Trump, with comments like:

    As constituents, we can't ever let this go. The list must be made public. Those who had any part in hurting children must be held accountable. My state has 2 democrat senators, but I can promise you if I lived in a state with republican senators that voted against releasing the list they'd never get my vote again.

    • Twisting in knots with top comments like:

    Any reason why Democrats didn't push for this when they controlled the House in 2022? EDIT: To clarify for the DMs-- yes, Bondi and Trump misstepped by turning this case into a media circus. The DOJ should rectify this mistake by releasing what they can, but don't be surprised if it's not "satisfactory" in the sense of being more boring than one might hope for. If the files contained damning evidence about Donald Trump, it raises the very obvious questions of: Why Trump teased the release of them and why he appointed Bondi/Patel/Bongino. If I was in such a file, I wouldn't be talking about it at all.

    I don’t care if fcking mother Theresa is on that client list, release it and hold every single one of them responsible. Tired of this shit. EDIT: to all the leftists flooding my inbox asking me “what if your orange idol is on the list!?” Then FCK him too! He’s not on the list, but if he is, then he can burn in hell with the rest of whoever is on the list.

    And the mega influencers are going to keep skewing this in Trump's favor, now that they found a way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    ah see, thanks. i need to catch up then. i was hoping to be wrong about the direction of their reactions but you are pointing out my worries coming true. "idk i'm seeing some vicious anger that appears to imply their focus on pedophilia overrides their allegiance to Trump," i thought. lol. welp. i guess we'll see but now i'm back to where i was.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    I wonder if the contents of the files can be called as evidence for the defense.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Murdoch, of all people, now a champion of free speech?

    It never ceases to amaze me how completely absurd the US is.

  • source
  • Discovery is going to be glorious. But TACO

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    It's cause he's a pedophile and rapes children

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He really wants to make sure everyone knows about his ties to his buddy Epstein doesn’t he? Or maybe he is that stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I feel like I'm watching one of those movies whose major third act twist you see coming from the opening scene but like, your 67 year old mom/grandmother is actually shocked by and gets so angry they want to leave the theater, and you can try to point out all the obvious signs telegraphing who the real killer is but some people just can not accept a story where the bad guy is pretending to be a normal human

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    This will send any evidence into the public domain. This'll be fun!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I can’t wait for discovery and Trump being forced to do a deposition. That worked so well for him in the past.

    Honestly, I feel like somehow they’re just going to settle out of court and he’ll get a few million sent his way for no apparent reason.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I'm sure Rupert Murdoch will have a treasure trove of shit on Trump.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    remember clinton wanting to be known as the education president. So many options for this guy. The litigious president, the graft president, the unqualified president, it just goes on and on.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Republicans are eating each other now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment