top 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 1 year ago

DNC is a huge problem with America as was Biden/Garland. They need/needed Trump to not fall out of a window, or be in military jail, in order for the most warmongering neocon DNC candidates to ensure warmongering. After Oct 7th, DNC's Israel first "job is to gaslight the left into supporting Israel", meant ensuring Trump's win, and today, have their elected Zionist supremacists, repeat attacks of communism on Mamdani.

On global warming, forcing a proxy war on Russia, not only enriches domestic oil companies to fund climate denial. pushing global diesel (home heating fuel same fraction) refining capacity to limit, with massive emissions from war, it also means no cooperation with Russia possible on global warming. It is simply impossible to prioritize human sustainability, if voters are made to support war, while struggling with the economic collapse directly accelerated by it, not to mention cultural divisiveness issues (not DNC/Biden fault).

The US needs either a military coup, or candidates/party that will remove citizenship and assets of Zionist oligarchy influencing US rulership. If money is speech, then money is terrorism.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    The experiment is over. The results were not great.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And that stuff about abortion shouldn't even be there after they didn't do anything for it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    The uni-party trash system.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    At least Democrats want to slowly slide us into a monarchy. MAGA wants it NOW!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    "Which side are you on?"

    The "two party" system is on the same side.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Change my mind

    Capitalism is a tool to maximize profit. Whoever thought it was a good idea to let capitalism have influence on laws so that they can maximize its profit was a big fool.

    What do you expect? Capitalism, a tool, has by definition no morale. Let it decide politics to increase profit and you end up with that kind of shit society we have today.

    Don't blame the hammer, when you hit your thumb. Also, don't let the hammer decide where to make the biggest dent.

    Can we please start again focusing on the people? Without people there is no society, and there is no market to increase profits.

    Start using capitalism and free markets like a tool. Want more renewable and clean energy? Make rules and see the magic of capitalism in making the best out of it.

    Instead we let capitalism decide what should be done next and suffer the consequences. It's as easy as that.

    Unfortunately capitalism not only create the rules, they also decide what is news and influence societies views. And that's why OPs picture is as it is.

    Fuck socialism, am I right guys?!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I agree with this 100%.

    Capitalism is exceptional at finding ways to provide value when there is a new market. The issue comes when capital gets accumulated and concentrated in the hands of a few.

    We've seen it dozens of times throughout history where a healthy merchant class with lots of opportunity for upwards mobility ends up in an oligarchy as the market becomes saturated then monopolies, duopolies, and cabals (guilds) form.

    The state needs to use the "P" and "L" in PESTEL forces (Political, Economical, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) that businesses (from single to large multinational) to identify new markets that need investment.

    An examples would be new clean renewable electricity and one way of giving preferrence to this green energy by minimally taxing profts on this energy sold in the national market or international market via grid-interconnect networks ("Gridternets" if you will) with a clear plan to increase the tax to a normalised amount slowly overtime as the green share of the market approaches 100%.

    It also has to be used to more aggressively dissuade markets that are more harmful than good now. An example of this is dirty power.

    Coal, Oil, and Gas have done wonders for increasing people's quality of life because they unlocked a new energy density previously unattainable. Now we have alternatives that are by every metric better; more efficient and less polluting.

    Therefore, these industries need to be taxed out of existence by using a logarithmic energy carbon tax that keeps increasing year on year. Corruption needs to be rooted out like a weed as much as possible using a politically independent organ of the state to keep it healthy.

    Then there's markets that are stagnant in some state of capture: crumbling infrastructure, food retailer hypermarkets, etc. Windfall suprise taxes on incumbents and grants / zero interest loans for new competitors would reignight competition in those markets and the additional tax revenue can be used to fix the crumbling infrastructure these markets rely on.

    And finally, I'd like to see a strong preference for co-operatives where ownership in a free market is much more evenly distributed by making them the least taxed commercial entities with businesses that have a higher concentration of ownership are taxed more through some sort of profit tax multiplier.

    It's much harder for a business to act in a pure profit motive to the detriment of society if the employees have more ownership as it allows morality to be expressed through political power within this business. These employees also then benefit from the profit share as well which gives stability and upward mobility in exchange for their labour.

    There, that's three proposals that could help towards decarbonisation, investing in underfunded infrastructure, and reducing inequality.

    I am not a policy expert and there's bound to be problems with each of those proposals that I haven't thought of, but we have so much more to gain by working cooperatively together to build a system that aims to better humanity as a whole by using the best tools correctly and safety.

    Until we reach an energy density which unlocks technology that enables things like a resourceless economy (a la Star Trek luxury space communism), we're stuck with the tools of money and capital as the ways to transfer value.

    I personally can't wait for the day where "reputation" rather than money becomes the currency of society, I am willing to work with the tools we have right now to build that future, and I have faith that others are willing to build it with me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I couldn't agree more. Also:

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Except MAGA is not neoliberalism unless we think tariffs are now "free trade". I get the point that neither party will wield power against capitalism, but they still use their power differently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    but they still use their power differently.

    Well...Do they though? On that pesky genocide (sorry I forgot--lets not call it 'genocide', right, that makes dems queasy-- how about we just say some people seem to have dropped dead), Bidens pretend "push back" and "negotiations" and "red lines" and "plans to build a dock to get food in and then hand it to the Israelis just like every single other land border crossing" all show that the dem centrists are simply mercenaries paid by zionists. mercenaries who take the time to put up some theatre for their evil so people dont have to acknowledge it, but the exact same outcomes happen either way. Most of the deaths and most of the building demolitions happened under Biden. When you and I start trying to parse if it was slightly faster under Trump, aren't we missing the point?

    We lost Roe under Biden, who famously never supported a womans right to choose until right before he got tapped to be VP. Strange coincidence?

    Appointing Merrick Garland as AG and then pretending to be powerless while Garland proceeded to lean right and sit on his hands for 4 entire years is another example. As is cracking down on free speech. And what did Biden do in the wake of all the police murders that the defund and reallocate movement brought to his door? He said explicitly that he didnt agree with the massive movement on the left, and shut it down, actually increasing police funding as an extra "eff you" to the dem voters. Same as a republican would. Wheres this imagined difference?

    And Biden famously told rooms full of rich donors at the end of Trumps term that "nothing would fundamentally change" (from Trump's first term) under him. This emncapsulates this whole discussion perfectly. Biden swearing to the rich that nothing will change, while pretending to run on change.

    This is the same Biden who shut down a rail strike, and then slowly over time negotiated a tiny fraction of what the strikers wanted, and then called it a victory on their behalf-- and then had the effing gall to walk a picket line for a photo op so his surrogates could trumpet how union-friendly he was. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/01/joe-biden-rail-strike-labor-unions

    Same Biden who during his term bragged about being harder on immigration than Trump ever had been-- and wore it like a badge of honor that he'd "closed the southern border". https://jacobin.com/2024/06/biden-asylum-executive-order-border

    Today centrist dems wont even admit there was ever any problem. So I guess you'd say we should change nothing and ignore the wildly eroding support and the poll numbers showing the democratic party has just 28% favorability?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh thanks for the red arrow and explanation, I would never have figured out this cuneiform riddle otherwise.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Just a reminder that the function of the Democratic party is to continually reduce expectations so that this diagram seems reasonable.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (25 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (23 children)

    I fucking hope, but we already seen that at 1st Trump term and after Biden was elected entire EU again got back to licking US boot, including something as unbelivable as fully allowing nordstream sabotage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It don't though, it just rises the price of energy because the gas still flows, even more than before, just from USA, Norway and yes, sill Russia, even more of it, but through middlemen. The sabotage also caused significant ecological catastrophe in the Baltic.

    About the sabotage itself you have three versions available:

    1. Truth, that USA bombed it, possibly with participation of Norway (note above paragraph, curiously the very same countries that gained the most on it, qui bono, eh?)
    2. USA version, where Ukraine did it, despite lacking means
    3. Official German/EU version, that is no version, because both above versions means that Germany is either vassal (ver1) or war ally (ver2) of country which attacked Germany in a biggest peacetime sabotage in German history.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (20 children)
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Bullshit. German politics is riddled with the same talking points as the US. Just today i read a german article talking about a "german roe v wade"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    In seiner Stellungnahme gegenüber „t-online.de“ führte Reimer weiter aus, dass er Brosius-Gersdorf, deren Wahl vor einer Woche aufgrund mangelnder Unterstützung innerhalb der Unionsfraktion ausgesetzt worden war, als Aktivistin wahrnehme, „die über eine Neuinterpretation des Grundgesetzes ein deutsches ,Roe v. Wade‘ erreichen will“. Darin sehe er einen „Bruch mit der gesamten bisherigen Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zu Art. 2 Abs. 2 GG“. Jener Artikel besagt: „Jeder hat das Recht auf Leben und körperliche Unversehrtheit. Die Freiheit der Person ist unverletzlich. In diese Rechte darf nur auf Grund eines Gesetzes eingegriffen werden.“

    https://www.die-tagespost.de/politik/katholischer-rechtswissenschaftler-ergaenzte-brosius-gersdorfs-wikipedia-eintrag-um-passage-zum-lebensschutz-art-265468

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Everyone I know, knows what Roe v Wade is...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Because its in the news everywhere?? Just google "deutsch roe v wade" and you'll see so many newsarticles about it. Genuinely the minutiae of us politics, government shutdowns etc. get widespread coverage in tagesschau, spiegel, focus etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Because we're a vassal state, so any major changes in the upper echelons of the empire will affect us, including all the "culture wars", such as the war on trans kids, womens rights etc. that get imported.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    A lot of the nazis especially in eastern europe got or still get funded by the cia because of their staunch anticommunism via gladio operations. Thats not to blame the empire for the bigotry of the average european but a lot of the fascist orgs get material support from seppoland.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No, the ussr did not fund paramilitary nazi groups formed from the remnants of former SS troops, or anything similar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Some cultural exchanges and auxiliary funding is not remotely the same as arming and connecting former SS troops to create clandestine paramilitary terror cells, like wtf are we comparing here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They werent funded, armed or trained by the ussr afaik and did not terrorise civilians.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I recommend providing sources next time youre making the comperison between nazi terror cells doing pogroms and some revolutionary groups doing targeted assasinations of fascist politicians. Provide a source that the assassination of Aldo moro was financed or otherwise materially supported by the ussr or shut up. Because I found nothing of the sort.

    Either way still not remotely comparable to what the wannabe-dirlewangers did and still do:

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Republicans just convinced Europe that the USA cannot be trusted anymore

    FYI: in the EU we don’t play the “it was Biden vs it was Trump” game. We stop at “it was the US”.

    What?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You literally just said that it was because of Republicans that the EU soured on the US and now you're telling me that in the EU you don't look at which party is in charge but at the US as a whole. Do you not see how these statements are contradictory?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Ok? The significance of the clip I posted was not that it was Biden saying it but what he said he would do (and very likely did). Why did that prompt you say, "FYI: in the EU we don’t play the “it was Biden vs it was Trump” game. We stop at “it was the US?”"

    The reason I posted that clip was to establish the reason why I believe the US blew up the pipeline. Yes, it happens to be Biden in that clip, but you're the one who started talking about distinguishing between Trump and Biden and then about not distinguishing between Trump and Biden. I'm just talking about the US.

    The only thing I can think of is that you're trying to preemptively shift the NordStream thing away from Biden and onto the US in general as a way of deflecting blame from Biden. But again, I just brought it up to establish US policy on NordStream, not specifically to bash Biden. If it's not that, then I just straight up don't understand you at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why would I want to deflect blame from Biden? I’m telling you that I’m a European and I don’t care who’s in charge in the US or which president did what.

    Why did you feel the need to say that you don't care about internal US politics when I didn't say shit about internal US politics?

    All I did was post a clip of the US president promising that he'll stop NordStream if Russia invaded Ukraine, despite not having the legal authority to do so. Then, of course, Russia invaded Ukraine, and the NordStream pipeline mysteriously got stopped (could be anyone, really!)

    because that sabotage was very convenient for every party

    It certainly wasn't convenient for Russia or Germany.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You mentioned that I may want to deflect the responsibility from Biden. -> I don’t have such interests.

    Again, why did you feel the need to say that you don’t care about internal US politics when I didn’t say shit about internal US politics?

    Whoever did it

    Yeah, could be Russia's biggest geopolitical rival that directly benefited both politically and economically by forcing Europe to buy their gas instead and which said that it would do that exact thing under those exact conditions and easily have the means to do it, or it could've been anyone, really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

    Don't remember the last time the Democrats had military storming our streets and black bagging US residents en masse and deporting them to war zones like South Sudan or Libya despite those people having zero ties to those countries.

    This reeks of fucking shitpost right-wing propaganda.

    Edit: here come all the "but the US/CIA did all this fucked up stuff to other countries under Dems, too!"

    JFC, the current "president" who is GOP literally yells about wanting to deport/arrest political opponents, censor TV personalities (e.g. Colbert, Fallon, etc), openly calls to suppress political opposition in voting, openly supports ignoring the courts when they interfere with his blatantly unconstitutional actions, etc etc .

    Yes, the Dems aren't fucking innocent, but to pretend they're the same as a party that's openly trying to "take back the Nazi word" is fucking insane.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    The problem is that both parties are right wings, only one somewhat more extreme. Both defends the rights of big corporations, billonairs and less or nothing those of the rest of the people. Public services, labor rights and even basic rights, like health and education are a bad joke in the US and only available if you have money. Now with Trump it goes even worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Off the top off my head the national guard during the george floyd protest that got called in by tim walz. Even trump was "impressed"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yes, because those circumstances were completely the same as what's going on now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    And that makes it acceptable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    People had literally burned down police stations and mass looting was occurring. Their police force was completely overrun. Don't act like it was remotely the same thing.

    I have several friends in Minneapolis that are very progressive. There were tons of people who were legit scared during periods of that for numerous reasons. It wasn't "acceptable," but what the fuck else do you do when law and order begins to completely breakdown?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It wasn't "acceptable," but what the fuck else do you do when law and order begins to completely breakdown?

    if it isn't acceptable it isn't acceptable period. "this was the only way" literally means that you think it was acceptable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I put it in quotes because I wasn't meaning it to be so exact.

    But whatever, I'm done arguing with enlightened centrists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    the Democrats had military storming our streets and black bagging US residents en masse

    The Posse Comitatus Act is what generally prevents military from "black bagging US residents" and leaves that job to police.

    Texas was the first state to allow for the national guard to assist in immigration efforts back in 2021. Democrats did nothing to stop, delay or prevent the expansion of those powers which were further pushed and nationalized in 2025.

    The other loophole is invoking the insurrection act. While Biden did not involve it it was repeatedly threatened during the Gaza war protests, however the protests never got too riotous for the Dems to risk damaging their image and the local police were perfectly capable of documenting and black bagging people for it.

    The cases of Kahlil and Mahdawi where Trump attended to deport individuals participating in those protests was made possible by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. That specific bill was introduced by the Democrats, passed the Democratic majority House and Senate, Vetoed by Democratic president Truman before being overridden by the house/Senate.

    You are correct that they are "not the same", but stating that the shield of your enemy is your friend, just because it isn't a sword is fucking insane.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    war zones like South Sudan or Libya despite those people having zero ties to those countries.

    Damn I wonder why Libya is like that!

    You absolute ghouls literally don't see foreigners as human

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    since the end of ww2 the two major coup d'états in brazil happened with direct support of the department of state and the cia under dem administration (johnson was in power in 64 and obama, with hillary clinton in charge of the department of state, in 2016). we've got a story or two to tell about them. if the regular lib doesn't care about that, then the most natural thing for us is to consider both parties equally harmful and don't give a damn over internal issues of the us and a.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -16 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    They're not the same. The Dems stand back and shake their fist/wring their hands when the Repubs have power and run roughshod over them. Then when the Dems have power they allow their efforts to be thwarted by the Repubs and gesture helplessly when in fact they could just push things through themselves.

    Also the DNC is a malfunctioning toilet that costs elections, implying that they think it's better to have a pro-establishment Repub in power than a Dem maverick.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I dunno, no Democrat ever threatened to make my country the 51st state since the 19th century...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    The US plans some of their invasion/regime change over the course of years if not decades.

    I honestly believe that Trump was briefed on some plans to annex Greenland, Canada and Panama, and the fucking buffoon let the cat out of the bag.

    I have something like 57% certainty that democrats would eventually start denouncing "fentanyl labs" in Canada and create excuses for invasion.

    edit: Worth noting, by the way, that's it's a consensus that Canada is more liberal than the US. Having Canada as a 51st state would essentially be handling the Dems a huge advantage for all elections going forward... Gee golly, I wonder whether they might actually root for Don a little bit, there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Having us as one state - jamming Quebec, BC, Ontario, etc all together would be a recipe for disaster above and beyond all the other disasters involved. It would be like, I don't know, merging New York and Georgia into one state.

    The FLQ alone would instantly revive and start up their bombing campaigns again.

    And be real, they would never give us status as states. We'd be Puerto Rico North at best until the violence died down in a century of terrorism and genocide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Having us as one state - jamming Quebec, BC, Ontario, etc all together would be a recipe for disaster above and beyond all the other disasters involved. It would be like, I don’t know, merging New York and Georgia into one state. The FLQ alone would instantly revive and start up their bombing campaigns again.

    The American elites are not above fostering a state of crisis and chaos. The BLM riots happened under Biden's administration. Biden had deportation camps. Look at current day USA.

    These "disasters" are not the deterrent you think it is.

    And be real, they would never give us status as states. We’d be Puerto Rico North at best until the violence died down in a century of terrorism and genocide.

    Being "real" would be admitting that the US empire is on the verge of collapses. I think decades of continuation is possible, but unlikely. Century? Impossible (at least, for the current statu quo).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›