I already know it's not that easy and that the Internet is constantly expanding, but I really wonder if it's possible to very roughly estimate its size

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

IDC forecasts that the amount of data generated each year will grow to 175 zettabytes by 2025. It further estimates that a total of 22 zettabytes of digital storage will be shipped across all storage media types between 2018 and 2025, with nearly 59 percent of this capacity being provided by the hard drive industry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zettabyte_Era

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Define "Internet" to answer your question more meaningfully.

    Are you counting cached copies of data (Cloudflare etc), or only the original copy? Only the source data or the data copied on the receiving end (webbrowser etc) too? Data at rest on a computer hard drive or data being transmitted or both? Are you only including world wide web (websites) or any data (gaming, streaming, fileshare). Humans or bots or both? Public web or dark web? Any computer physically connected to a network or only those data accessible publicly?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Would it be easier to be simply defined as any data on any storage device that is connected to the internet and accessible that way? This would include things such as those CloudFlare cached copies and anything beyond simply WWW and make no distinction between humans and bots or dark or public. I guess that would make it pretty hard to make any even remotely educated guess though since so much it would not be accessible to anyon trying to count it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    My friend works at AWS and has single customers with hundreds to thousands of petabytes.

    In whole sum, I think it would be pretty unfathomable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Follow up question: what percentage of that do you think is porn?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This was asked less then a week ago
    https://lemmy.world/post/53033969

    but depending on where you draw the line on what is the internet then we are likely in the Exobyte territory.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Something I always find kind of puts the scale into perspective, is that all these AI companies have a huge interest in storing as much of the internet's data as possible, because they need access for training and it ensures they continue to have access to relatively high-quality (it's only going to get worse with more and more content on the internet being generated).

    And yet, even with their trillions of investor money, they evidently don't have it all stored. Because they still regularly hammer all kinds of webpages with an insane number of requests, when they do their trainings.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Yes, you can estimate anything.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Idk but I'm about to eclipse 200TB myself! 😅

    1. 6x 3TB in RAID10 = 18TB raw (9TB usable)
    2. 10x 8TB in RAID5E = 80TB raw (64TB usable)
    3. 8x 16TB in RAID5 = 128TB raw (112TB usable)

    AKA 226TB raw or 185TB usable

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    lmgtfy? estimates vary a lot of course but currently tend to range from tens to hundreds of zettabytes.

    A Zettabyte is 10^21^ bytes. That is trillions of gigabytes, or to put it another way: tens of terabytes per living person.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zettabyte_Era

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    We had the same question just a few days ago: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/69097816

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    this feels like a perfect llm question. It may have it wrong. It quite likely will be wrong or at least not exact. But it will give you a feel good answer that is going to be correct with enough proximity tolerance.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment