ad-blockers are security tools
post
Israel
Ad blocking is network security.
Friendly reminder to BLOCK ALL ADVERTISEMENTS!
They are a legitimate cybersecurity threat (not to mention all the scams).
Install uBlock Origin in Firefox, ditch Chrome entirely, use adblocking DNS, and consider setting up a PiHole at home or using AdNauseum.
why is this terrorist nation still allowed to be a fucking nation? i mean i know it’s because a lot of people profit from them but sheesh…
Eventually we'll get a list of all the groups that bought spyware from NSO, with the approval of the Israeli government. That list will include basically every globally important group, from the US government to mega-corps
We already know it was used in the murder of Jamal Khashoggi
Because nations serve the interests of the elites. This terrorist nation, serves the interests of the elites more than other nations.
Thus, the elites get more nation per nation. Of course they are not gonna let such a deal go.
Does it really matter that it was an Israeli advertising company? Would you hold this against any other country?
I'm just saying, there are upwards of 700 "trusted" partners on some websites, chances are that some of them also try to maximise their profit margins in a similar way. I at least wouldn't hold it against Ireland, for example, as a nation, if one of their tech firms does the same.
Don't blame on colonialism what can adequately be explained by capitalism, or something.
israel only exists because of capitalism, and i’d be pissed if ireland installed malware too. except .. see.. ireland isn’t doing terrorism or genocide. so.. there’s that
Nations in their modern form all exist because of capitalism. Israel is actually "special" in that way, because it's the Wests last mostly settler-colonial project, which results in all kinds of strange and anachronistic contradictions.
In this hypothetical, not Ireland, an Irish company. Would you blame the Irish government for actions of an Irish company?
Is there some way for us to block ads at network-level on networks we don't control? Something that allowed us to connect to public wifis or work networks and prevent ads from loading, therefore messing with the digital economy if we did this on a large scale?
Edit: I didn't explain my thoughts very well. I mean blocking ads for other people around me. I know that's probably not even legal, but would be awesome, if possible
On Android this is possible: under "Network & Internet" settings there is a field called "Private DNS." Simply set your own preferred DNS server here.
Adguard has public DNS options that block all advertising, even inside apps, though for state-level exploits as described in this article I'd assume the only way to be 100% sure is to run your own PiHole.
The only caveat I'd add is using the Private DNS function can sometimes break WiFi login pages or cause other network issues - a couple times I've found I need to revert to "automatic" to get a WiFi or app to connect properly
The large scale part won’t be possible without some type of network control.
The super easy way is replacing the DNS at the router (in the DHCP config) with some public, ad-blocking DNS. But you need access to the router’s config.
You can find very cheap routers with default credentials in the wild.
I feel like there's at least one historical example of a worm being released that was designed to attack home routers and patch the vulnerability it exploited, but my search is failing.
Anyway, that's the sort of tactic you'd need to do what you're asking.
That's exactly what I'd love to be able to do. Just imagine, a "mere" 10% of routers affected would be enough to give a significant reduction in ad revenue to some big corps
I think you’re on to something.
This predatory ad shit works because most people don’t care enough to do something about it. That same cohort of people likely also won’t care enough to fix the “issue.” They’ll hear about it, see their email still works fine and move on with life.
Edit: could we design something like a community vpn project? Something like… I don’t know… like Tor, but for a completely different purpose? Something you can install and it routes your traffic through globally distributed nodes which automatically filter your traffic to remove ads and other security measures?
That would keep things opt-in. It would keep control of the system / filtering bound by community interest. We could set up separate filtering systems too — in case that would be required. Users can pick which filter package their traffic is treated with.
I don’t have a lot of bandwidth, but I definitely have some to spare. I am not using my Internet 24/7.
Edit 2: to be clear, I don’t really think opt-in is justified here’s though. The interesting question isn't whether we can block advertisements for strangers. It's whether we can justify protecting people from a demonstrably dangerous infrastructure, even when they haven't requested that protection.
Consider three premises:
- An infrastructure exposes people to harms they generally don't understand or meaningfully consent to.
- A third party possesses a mechanism that can reduce those harms without requiring individual participation.
- The intervention introduces substantially less risk than it prevents.
I don't think requiring explicit, individualized consent is automatically the most defensible ethical position. We already accept similar arrangements in cybersecurity.
Email providers filter malicious attachments without asking recipients about each one. Network administrators block connections to malicious destinations. Browsers prevent known dangerous downloads.
The important precedent is that protective defaults can be justified without affirmative consent for every individual intervention.
However, those examples involve services or systems with an established responsibility for protecting their users. Therefore I think our approach should be similarly designed. A stranger modifying somebody else's communications has no comparable authority.
Silently installing protective software through advertising exploits is theoretically conceivable, but it would reproduce the same unauthorized device-compromise problem we're trying to eliminate. I would be cautious about this — what if your infrastructure can itself because a centralized attack surface?
I also wonder about what methods can target ad infrastructure directly, though. That’s another approach.
A localized DNS server with PI hole, or just a firewall in between your device and the on-site network could do it. DHCP makes it difficult to get this to people without being malicious about it, and most tech would detect and block it if you tried.
NextDNS or similar custom DNS.
You can run a PiHole or similar at home to block ads, but that doesn’t work when you’re on the go.
Once in a while I need to turn it off because a link in an email doesn’t work (blacklisted tracking domain, but also how you unsubscribe) and for that brief moment, seeing the full, unblocked internet the way regular people see it is shocking.
They say that millions of users worldwide have been served ads by Discover-Tech since 2024, including in Yemen, Brazil, Mexico and Czechia.
You can bet Westerners are included.
Through cookie sharing agreements they touched hundreds of millions of computers it's thought.
From the comments:
schleck8 37 minutes ago | prev | next [–]
This is even crazier than the last time Citizen Lab found an Israeli zero-click spyware (Pegasus). You could call it a sequel reply
icantevenhold 8 minutes ago | parent | next [–]
Don't call it a comeback, I been here for years Rocking my peers and putting suckas in fear
https://citizenlab.ca/research/how-discover-tech-turned-targeted-ads-into-a-pipeline-for-spyware/
Here's the full blog post.
They didn't mention much about the attack chain itself, but they did mention it was capable of targeting both android/iOS and windows.
It would be more useful to know what vulnerabilities are being exploited here. The fact that the possibility to hack people is used if it exists is not surprising. Even if these people didn’t do it, others might, which is why this shouldn’t be possible in the first place.
The real research: https://citizenlab.ca/research/how-discover-tech-turned-targeted-ads-into-a-pipeline-for-spyware/
Here is the boiled down points from this
-
you open a page that has an ad served from Discovery-Tech ad inventory
-
the ad has a standard script in to that calls back to the home server and passes your advertising ID (cookie ID on desktop or mobile ID on mobile) plus your IP
-
there is a third party that has compiled a list of ad ID + IP that effectively de-anonymizes users. This is used to target specific people. The info passed by the ad is compared against the target list. If there is no match to the target nothing further happens.
-
if a match is found it returns javascript that runs on the page. It finger prints the device then it checks for an exploit.
-
if the exploit it is looking for is found the exploit corrupts memory in the rendering engine, achieves native code execution, escapes the sandbox, and installs the spyware.
And, yes, ad blocker software would stop this. If the ad cannot render it cannot call back to the mothership. The only exception to this would be if the ad was served first party, like the website you were visiting was also hosting the ad. Or if you are on a device using a browser that is part of a app that does not have ad blocking, like the built in browser for instagram.
Here is what they did not say
We don't know which browser, OS, or application vulnerability was used at Al Jazeera. It could be a unknown zero day one or a one that is known but only works on certain older versions of software.
Adding in a standard YSK how to delete your advertising ID from your mobile device.
Once again proving that my PiHole is an essential security component on my network instead of just something that blocks annoying ads.
You're saying that uBlockOrigin would not block these ads ?
It would only block these ads if they are displayed in a browser with ublock installed. Apps would still be a problem.

uBlock Origin and Pi-hole are both fantastic (but different) tools.
Maybe, but my PiHole blocks these ads before they even hit my network. I have no ads on any device in my home, including phones, tablets, smartwatches, etc.
Any guest that comes over and connects to my wifi suddenly sees a much cleaner internet.
These articles suck, in that they want me to disable my ad blocker to read an article about how ads can now do malicious stuff by just being viewed. Then there is no info as to what it’s doing or how it’s doing whatever malicious things it claims, let alone the OS this affects.
Remember when pop ads could open a new window on your browser?
According to the report, Controlium is able to harvest a user’s identity and IP address when the user is shown a seemingly benign custom-created ad – for example, for a digital game or a telecoms service. If the user has been selected as a target for hacking, a mercenary spyware firm can then send a malicious code containing spyware to their device, the researchers say.
They say that millions of users worldwide have been served ads by Discover-Tech since 2024, including in Yemen, Brazil, Mexico and Czechia.
Related work by the research group Confiant also suggests that Discover-Tech’s ads have been shown to users of the networks of government entities in Europe and the US, as well as the UN, Nato, the international criminal court and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
“It’s disastrous that major ad vendors and organisations apparently were neither able to detect nor prevent the company’s malicious advertising operations for years,” said Wolfie Christl, a researcher at Citizen Lab. “The way the online advertising ecosystem works today is a security threat for states, the private sector, civil society and everyone else alike.”
It doesn’t explicitly say how it works, though I imagine it’s just looking for vulnerable os & user-agents
From the comments:
schleck8 37 minutes ago | prev | next [–]
This is even crazier than the last time Citizen Lab found an Israeli zero-click spyware (Pegasus). You could call it a sequel reply
icantevenhold 8 minutes ago | parent | next [–]
Don't call it a comeback, I been here for years Rocking my peers and putting suckas in fear
all 2 comments